Bone morphogenetic proteins and the polycystic ovary syndrome

  • E Leonie AF van Houten1,

    Affiliated with

    • Joop SE Laven2,

      Affiliated with

      • Yvonne V Louwers2,

        Affiliated with

        • Anke McLuskey1,

          Affiliated with

          • Axel PN Themmen1 and

            Affiliated with

            • Jenny A Visser1Email author

              Affiliated with

              Journal of Ovarian Research20136:32

              DOI: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-32

              Received: 8 January 2013

              Accepted: 21 April 2013

              Published: 30 April 2013

              Abstract

              Background

              Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is defined by two out of the following three criteria being met: oligo- or anovulation, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries. Affected women are often obese and insulin resistant. Although the etiology is still unknown, members of the Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) family, including Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), have been implicated to play a role. In this pilot study we aimed to measure serum BMP levels in PCOS patients.

              Methods

              Twenty patients, fulfilling the definition of PCOS according to the Rotterdam Criteria, were randomly selected. Serum BMP2, -4, -6 and −7 levels were measured using commercially available BMP2, BMP4, BMP6 and BMP7 immunoassays.

              Results

              Serum BMP2, serum BMP4 and serum BMP6 levels were undetectable. Three patients had detectable serum BMP7 levels, albeit at the lower limit of the standard curve.

              Conclusions

              BMP levels were undetectable in almost all patients. This suggests that with the current sensitivity of the BMP assays, measurement of serum BMP levels is not suitable as a diagnostic tool for PCOS.

              Keywords

              BMPs PCOS Marker Assay

              Introduction

              Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders in premenopausal women [1]. The diagnosis is based on two of the following three criteria being met: hyperandrogenism, oligo- or anovulation, and polycystic ovaries [2]. PCOS is the most frequent cause of infertility in women in their reproductive years, affecting 6-8% of women in the general population worldwide. Besides the reproductive phenotype, women with PCOS often display a metabolic phenotype: 38-88% of women with PCOS are obese with a characteristic abdominal distribution of fat and up to 70% are insulin resistant and some are found to have type II Diabetes Mellitus [3, 4]. Although the etiology is unknown, it is generally agreed that elevated androgens are the main culprit of the syndrome [5]. The increased ovarian androgen production may result from the increased GnRH pulsatility, which leads to increased LH secretion in favor of FSH [6]. Combined with the advanced LH responsiveness of small growing follicles, this causes increased androgen production, which is further enhanced by the elevated insulin levels. This abnormal endocrine environment has been suggested to suppress FSH action and causing follicular arrest [7]. In addition, intrinsic alterations in folliculogenesis have been proposed to contribute to the failure in dominant follicle selection in PCOS [7]. Ovarian growth factors, such as members of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family, play important roles in follicle recruitment, follicle selection, and FSH responsiveness. Studies performed predominantly in rodents showed that the various Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are expressed in a cell-specific manner in the ovary, and display spatial and temporal changes in expression depending on the stage of follicular development [810]. BMP15 is specifically expressed by oocytes [11], also in ovine, bovine and human, whereas BMP6 has an oocyte/granulosa cell expression pattern in various species. BMP2 is expressed by granulosa cells in rodents and bovine, while BMP4 and BMP7 are theca cells derived growth factors with mRNA expression detectable from the small preantral stage onwards in rats [8, 12]. However, in mouse, human and bovine ovaries also granulosa cell expression of BMP4 mRNA has been reported [1315]. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is specifically expressed by the granulosa cells of small growing follicles in various species including human [16]. BMPs and AMH differently regulate FSH responsiveness and FSH-induced steroidogenesis, hence it has been suggested that these factors may contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS.

              Several studies have shown that serum AMH levels are elevated in women with PCOS. These elevated levels reflect the increased antral follicle count (AFC) in PCOS. In addition, AMH production per granulosa cell appears to be increased [1719]. Whether serum BMP levels are altered in women with PCOS is unknown.

              Given the role of BMPs in FSH-responsiveness and FSH-induced steroidogenesis, we investigated whether serum BMP levels could be used as a diagnostic tool for PCOS.

              Materials and methods

              Patients

              Twenty normogonadotrophic normoestrogenic dysovulatory patients, fulfilling the definition of PCOS according to the Rotterdam Criteria [2], were selected from the Rotterdam PCOS cohort, which comprises of PCOS patients attending our fertility clinic between 1997 and 2011. Standardized initial screening (clinical investigation, transvaginal ultrasound, and fasting blood withdrawal) was performed on a random cycle day between 0900 and 1100 h, irrespective of the interval between blood sampling and the preceding bleeding, as previously described [20]. Biochemically hyperandrogenemia was defined as an elevated (>4.5) free androgen index (testosterone × 100/ SHBG) and clinical hyperandrogenemia was defined as a Ferriman Gallway score > 8. Polycystic ovaries were defined as 12 or more follicles (measuring 2–9 mm) per ovary, and/or an ovarian volume above 10 ml [21]. Endocrine screening included assessment of serum AMH, testosterone and SHBG levels and were determined previously [22, 23]. Briefly, blood samples were stored at −20 C until further assessments were made. Serum hormone levels were assessed at the time patients were originally seen. Serum SHBG was measured by luminescence-based immunometric assays (Immulite 2000, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Serum testosterone was measured using a RIA (Diagnostic Products Corp.). AMH levels were measured collectively in samples stored, using an in-house AMH ELISA assay (commercially available through Beckman Coulter, Woerden, The Netherlands). Approval by the local medical ethics committee was obtained and all participants have given informed consent.

              BMP measurements

              Serum BMP2, -4 and −7 levels were measured using a Quantikine BMP2, BMP4 and BMP7 Immunoassay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Serum BMP6 levels were measured using a human BMP6 DuoSet ELISA Development kit (also R&D Systems). All samples were measured in single measurements according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For BMP2 the detection limit of the assay was between 62.5 pg/mL and 4000 pg/mL. For BMP4 and −7 the detection limits of the assay were between 31.2 pg/mL and 2000 pg/mL. For BMP6 the detection limit of the assay was between 78.13 pg/mL and 1000 pg/mL. Controls with low, medium and high concentrations for BMP2 (207–558 pg/mL, 759–1509 pg/mL, 1670–3061 pg/mL), BMP4 (89–140 pg/mL, 512–780 pg/mL, 958–1468 pg/mL) and BMP7 (180–248 pg/mL, 502–698 pg/mL, 1010–1442 pg/mL) were provided by R&D Systems. For BMP6 controls were not available. All samples where measured in one plate per assay.

              Results

              PCOS patient characteristics are given in Table 1. Serum BMP7 was detectable in only three of the 20 PCOS patients (Table 1), albeit at very low levels. Serum BMP2, -4 and −6 were undetectable in all PCOS patients (Table 1). Extending the standard curve with an extra dilution step, allowed the detection of serum BMP4 in only one patient, whereas BMP2 and −6 remained undetectable. In contrast, serum AMH levels were easily detectable at an average concentration of 20.9 ng/mL. For four patients AMH levels were unknown, because data and serum of these patients were collected before AMH measurements were routinely determined in the clinic.
              Table 1

              Clinical characteristics and BMP levels in PCOS women

              Patient

              Age (years)

              FAI

              BMI (kg/m 2)

              AFC

              AMH (ng/ml)

              BMP2 (pg/mL)

              BMP4 (pg/mL)

              BMP6 (pg/mL)

              BMP7 (pg/mL)

              1

              28

              1.63

              21.6

              42

              13.2

              -

              -

              -

              -

              2

              28

              0.92

              22

              55

              28.7

              -

              -

              -

              -

              3

              30

              1.68

              20

              47

              15.8

              -

              -

              -

              -

              4

              20

              0.62

              22.2

              50

              20

              -

              -

              -

              -

              5

              30

              1.03

              19.6

              59

              31.9

              -

              -

              -

              57.60

              6

              30

              7.93

              24.6

              40

              30.9

              -

              -

              -

              -

              7

              23

              5.53

              19.4

              73

              28.5

              -

              -

              -

              -

              8

              22

              5.70

              21.1

              54

              n.d.

              -

              -

              -

              -

              9

              20

              5.50

              24.7

              62

              n.d.

              -

              -

              -

              43.88

              10

              25

              13.27

              24.2

              48

              26.6

              -

              -

              -

              -

              11

              25

              1.50

              30.4

              32

              6.5

              -

              -

              -

              -

              12

              31

              1.75

              44.1

              77

              23.5

              -

              -

              -

              -

              13

              31

              1.42

              30.1

              41

              8.8

              -

              -

              -

              -

              14

              24

              1.21

              31.8

              44

              13.6

              -

              -

              -

              -

              15

              26

              13.50

              30.1

              160

              n.d.

              -

              -

              -

              -

              16

              25

              15.13

              32.3

              153

              37

              -

              -

              -

              42.38

              17

              27

              19.20

              32.7

              110

              n.d.

              -

              -

              -

              -

              18

              27

              9.20

              32.0

              103

              17.8

              -

              -

              -

              -

              19

              28

              9.50

              34.3

              101

              n.d.

              -

              -

              -

              -

              20

              23

              26.57

              43.2

              91

              26.6

              -

              -

              -

              -

              FAI: Free Androgen Index; BMI: Body Mass Index; AFC: Antral Follicle count.

              n.d.: not determined.

              - : below detection limit of the assay.

              Discussion

              In this pilot study, BMP2, -4 and −6 were undetectable in all PCOS patients. BMP7 was detectable in only three patients, but with levels close to the lower limit of the standard curve. The addition of an extra lowest point to the standard curve did not improve the measurement of BMPs. The patients with discernible serum BMP7 values did not show a consistent pattern with respect to FAI, BMI or AFC. Since the BMPs studied were undetectable in nearly all of the twenty PCOS patients, and therefore could not be used to further distinguish the heterogeneous PCOS population, we did not attempt to analyze a larger number of PCOS patients nor a cohort of normo-ovulatory women as controls.

              In a recent study by Son et al. [24], serum BMP4 levels were measured in male and female subjects and shown to be associated with adiposity, insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. BMP4 levels ranged between 0.63 ± 0.41 pg/mL and 9.91 ± 4.48 pg/mL and were determined with the same assay as in our study. Since the lowest point of the standard curve of the BMP4 assay is 31.2 pg/mL, these values are well below the standard curve, and therefore it is unclear whether the results of Son et al. have any practical implications. Associations of BMP4 values that far below the detection range are weak at best.

              Conflicting results have also been reported for BMP2 and BMP7. Using the same assay, one study showed that serum BMP2 levels were undetectable in patients with femoral fractures [25], whereas in another study, serum BMP2 and −7 levels [10, 26, 27] could be detected in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, arthritis and healthy subjects [28]. Also, in the latter study BMP levels were near or below the detection range of the assay. In agreement, other studies have also shown that serum BMP7 levels are often below or close to the standard curve of the assay [29, 30].

              All women used in this study had polycystic ovaries and in accordance with these results increased AMH levels. An explanation for the undetectable serum BMP levels in this study could be that BMPs are not secreted by the human ovary, although it has been reported that BMP2, -4, -6 and 7 are expressed by the human ovary [9]. This explanation may not be likely since this would be in contrast to other ovarian expressed TGFβ family members that are secreted, such as AMH, Inhibin B and Activin A [18, 31]. Alternatively, BMP immunoreactivity may not have been preserved. Prolonged storage and repeated freeze/thawing of the samples did not affect the immunoreactivity of AMH, a family member of BMPs, but an effect on BMP immunoreactivity cannot be ruled out. However, based on the studies mentioned above and our own study, we prefer to suggest an alternative reason, namely that the current available BMP assays are not sensitive enough to detect BMP ligands in the circulation of human subjects. Therefore, more sensitive assays are necessary to determine whether serum BMP levels could be used as an additional diagnostic tool in PCOS and other metabolic diseases.

              Declarations

              Authors’ Affiliations

              (1)
              Department of Internal Medicine
              (2)
              Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics

              References

              1. Franks S: Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 1995, 333: 853–861. 10.1056/NEJM199509283331307PubMedView Article
              2. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group: Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004, 19: 41–47.View Article
              3. Escobar-Morreale HF, San Millan JL: Abdominal adiposity and the polycystic ovary syndrome. TEM 2007, 18: 266–272.PubMed
              4. Franks S, Gharani N, Gilling-Smith C: Polycystic ovary syndrome: evidence for a primary disorder of ovarian steroidogenesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999, 69: 269–272. 10.1016/S0960-0760(99)00044-8PubMedView Article
              5. Homburg R: Androgen circle of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 2009, 24: 1548–1555. 10.1093/humrep/dep049PubMedView Article
              6. Blank SK, McCartney CR, Marshall JC: The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 2006, 12: 351–361. 10.1093/humupd/dml017PubMedView Article
              7. Franks S, Mason H, Willis D: Follicular dynamics in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000, 163: 49–52. 10.1016/S0303-7207(99)00239-7PubMedView Article
              8. Erickson GF, Shimasaki S: The spatiotemporal expression pattern of the bone morphogenetic protein family in rat ovary cell types during the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003, 1: 9. 10.1186/1477-7827-1-9PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
              9. Knight PG, Glister C: TGF-beta superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 2006, 132: 191–206. 10.1530/rep.1.01074View Article
              10. Shimasaki S, Moore RK, Otsuka F, Erickson GF: The bone morphogenetic protein system in mammalian reproduction. Endocr Rev 2004, 25: 72–101. 10.1210/er.2003-0007PubMedView Article
              11. Elvin JA, Yan C, Matzuk MM: Oocyte-expressed TGF-beta superfamily members in female fertility. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000, 159: 1–5. 10.1016/S0303-7207(99)00185-9PubMedView Article
              12. Baarends WM, Uilenbroek JT, Kramer P, Hoogerbrugge JW, van Leeuwen EC, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA: Anti-mullerian hormone and anti-mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat ovaries during postnatal development, the estrous cycle, and gonadotropin-induced follicle growth. Endocrinology 1995, 136: 4951–4962. 10.1210/en.136.11.4951PubMed
              13. Fatehi AN, van den Hurk R, Colenbrander B, Daemen AJ, van Tol HT, Monteiro RM, Roelen BA, Bevers MM: Expression of bone morphogenetic protein2 (BMP2), BMP4 and BMP receptors in the bovine ovary but absence of effects of BMP2 and BMP4 during IVM on bovine oocyte nuclear maturation and subsequent embryo development. Theriogenology 2005, 63: 872–889. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.05.013PubMedView Article
              14. Khalaf M, Morera J, Bourret A, Reznik Y, Denoual C, Herlicoviez M, Mittre H, Benhaim A: BMP system expression in GCs from polycystic ovary syndrome women and the in vitro effects of BMP4, BMP6, and BMP7 on GC steroidogenesis. Eur J Endocrinol 2013, 168: 437–444. 10.1530/EJE-12-0891PubMedView Article
              15. von Schalburg KR, McCarthy SP, Rise ML, Hutson JC, Davidson WS, Koop BF: Expression of morphogenic genes in mature ovarian and testicular tissues: potential stem-cell niche markers and patterning factors. Mol Reprod Dev 2006, 73: 142–152. 10.1002/mrd.20359PubMedView Article
              16. Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Themmen AP: Anti-Mullerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 2006, 131: 1–9. 10.1530/rep.1.00529View Article
              17. Cook CL, Siow Y, Brenner AG, Fallat ME: Relationship between serum mullerian-inhibiting substance and other reproductive hormones in untreated women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal women. Fertil Steril 2002, 77: 141–146. 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02944-2PubMedView Article
              18. Laven JS, Mulders AG, Visser JA, Themmen AP, De Jong FH, Fauser BC: Anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations in normoovulatory and anovulatory women of reproductive age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89: 318–323. 10.1210/jc.2003-030932PubMedView Article
              19. Pellatt L, Hanna L, Brincat M, Galea R, Brain H, Whitehead S, Mason H: Granulosa cell production of anti-Mullerian hormone is increased in polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 92: 240–245.PubMedView Article
              20. Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Fauser BC: Predictors of patients remaining anovulatory during clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998, 83: 2361–2365. 10.1210/jc.83.7.2361PubMed
              21. van Santbrink EJ, Hop WC, Fauser BC: Classification of normogonadotropic infertility: polycystic ovaries diagnosed by ultrasound versus endocrine characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 1997, 67: 452–458. 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80068-4PubMedView Article
              22. Kevenaar ME, Laven JS, Fong SL, Uitterlinden AG, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Visser JA: A functional anti-mullerian hormone gene polymorphism is associated with follicle number and androgen levels in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008, 93: 1310–1316. 10.1210/jc.2007-2205PubMedView Article
              23. Lie Fong S, Schipper I, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Visser JA, Laven JS: Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B concentrations are not useful predictors of ovarian response during ovulation induction treatment with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2011, 96: 459–463. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.084PubMedView Article
              24. Son JW, Kim MK, Park YM, Baek KH, Yoo SJ, Song KH, Son HS, Yoon KH, Lee WC, Cha BY: Association of serum bone morphogenetic protein 4 levels with obesity and metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic individuals. Endocr J 2011, 58: 39–46. 10.1507/endocrj.K10E-248PubMedView Article
              25. Giannoudis PV, Pountos I, Morley J, Perry S, Tarkin HI, Pape HC: Growth factor release following femoral nailing. Bone 2008, 42: 751–757. 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.219PubMedView Article
              26. Gilchrist RB, Ritter LJ, Armstrong DT: Oocyte-somatic cell interactions during follicle development in mammals. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 82–83: 431–446.PubMedView Article
              27. McNatty KP, Smith P, Moore LG, Reader K, Lun S, Hanrahan JP, Groome NP, Laitinen M, Ritvos O, Juengel JL: Oocyte-expressed genes affecting ovulation rate. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2005, 234: 57–66. 10.1016/j.mce.2004.08.013PubMedView Article
              28. Park MC, Park YB, Lee SK: Relationship of bone morphogenetic proteins to disease activity and radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 2008, 37: 200–204. 10.1080/03009740701774941PubMedView Article
              29. Bozkaya YT, Aydin HH, Celik HA, Kayikcioglu M, Payzin S, Kultursay H, Aydin M, Yesil M, Can LH, Hasdemir C: Increased myocardial collagen turnover in patients with progressive cardiac conduction disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008, 31: 1284–1290. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01179.xPubMedView Article
              30. Wendling D, Cedoz JP, Racadot E: Serum levels of MMP-3 and cathepsin K in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: effect of TNFalpha antagonist therapy. Joint Bone Spine 2008, 75: 559–562. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.01.026PubMedView Article
              31. Eldar-Geva T, Spitz IM, Groome NP, Margalioth EJ, Homburg R: Follistatin and activin A serum concentrations in obese and non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 2001, 16: 2552–2556. 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2552PubMedView Article

              Copyright

              © van Houten et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              Advertisement