Open Access

Expression and activity of Rac1 is negatively affected in the dehydroepiandrosterone induced polycystic ovary of mouse

  • Vineet Kumar Maurya1,
  • Chadchan Sangappa1,
  • Vijay Kumar1,
  • Sahil Mahfooz1,
  • Archana Singh1,
  • Singh Rajender2 and
  • Rajesh Kumar Jha1Email author
Journal of Ovarian Research20147:32

DOI: 10.1186/1757-2215-7-32

Received: 3 September 2013

Accepted: 22 February 2014

Published: 14 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by the presence of multiple follicular cysts, giving rise to infertility due to anovulation. This syndrome affects about 10% of women, worldwide. The exact molecular mechanism leading to PCOS remains obscure. RhoGTPase has been associated with oogenesis, but its role in PCOS remains unexplored. Therefore, we attempted to elucidate the Vav-Rac1 signaling in PCOS mice model.

Methods

We generated a PCOS mice model by injecting dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) for a period of 20 days. The expression levels of Rac1, pRac1, Vav, pVav and Caveolin1 were analyzed by employing immuno-blotting and densitometry. The association between Vav and Rac1 proteins were studied by immuno-precipitation. Furthermore, we analyzed the activity of Rac1 and levels of inhibin B and 17β-estradiol in ovary using biochemical assays.

Results

The presence of multiple follicular cysts in ovary were confirmed by histology. The activity of Rac1 (GTP bound state) was significantly reduced in the PCOS ovary. Similarly, the expression levels of Rac1 and its phosphorylated form (pRac1) were decreased in PCOS in comparison to the sham ovary. The expression level and activity (phosphorylated form) of guanine nucleotide exchanger of Rac1, Vav, was moderately down-regulated. We observed comparatively increased expressions of Caveolin1, 17β-estradiol, and inhibin B in the polycystic ovary.

Conclusion

We conclude that hyperandrogenization (PCOS) by DHEA diminishes ovarian Rac1 and Vav expression and activity along with an increase in expression of Caveolin1. This is accompanied by an increase in the intra-ovarian level of '17 β-estradiol and inhibin B.

Keywords

Polycystic ovary Dehydroepiandrosterone Rac1 Estradiol Vav Caveolin1

Introduction

The pool of primordial follicles in the ovary supply eggs for the entire reproductive life in mammals. To maintain fertility for the whole reproductive period, the primordial follicles are reserved in a quiescent state for regulated successive ovulation [13]. Primordial follicles are recruited from the reserve of dormant follicles into the pool of growing follicles through their activation process during which they undergo a series of developments [3]. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by anovulation and in the presence of multiple small cysts typically arranged in the periphery of one or both ovaries. PCOS can affect 5–10% of women during their reproductive age and contributes to this etiology in about 10% of the infertile women [46]. This disorder is considered to be a manifestation of the disturbance in the endocrine system, which causes secondary disorders contributing to female infertility [7]. The most commonly seen endocrine disturbance is hyperandrogenism accompanied by chronic oligo or anovulation [8]. The hypothalamic-pituitary synchrony is disrupted that increases pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin, disturbs oocyte-granulosa cell interaction, enhances ovarian androgen production and causes excess insulin production and that leads to insulin resistance [9]. As a result, metabolic syndrome (MS) is seen in about 46% of the PCOS cases [10].

However, the intra-ovarian pathophysiology of PCOS is not yet explicit at cellular and molecular levels. The available data till date is insufficient to precisely delineate the intra-ovarian pathway that contributes to the development of this disorder. Therefore, we need further investigations to pinpoint the correct mechanism leading to the development of this disorder. The G-protein family member, Ras, has already been shown to participate in the pathophysiology of PCOS [11]. Another member of Rho family protein, Rac, is involved in gonad formation [12] and acts downstream to integrin signaling [13]. Its expression/activity is controlled by estrogen [14]. Rho guanine dissociation inhibitor (RhoGDI) antagonizes Rac1 and keeps it in the inactive state [15, 16]. The Rho assists in actin dynamics through cofilin regulation by Luteinizing hormone signaling [17] in the granulosa cells [18]. Furthermore, Rac modulates cell cycle [19], which is activated by guanine exchange factor Vav [20, 21]. Further, it is reported that Rac gets phosphorylated in the process of its activation [22]. Similarly, Vav also gets phosphorylated before it executes Rac activation [23, 24]. Looking at the role of Rac/Vav signaling in ovarian physiology, we designed the present study to analyze expression and activity of Rac1 and Vav proteins in the ovary of a mice model of PCOS.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Dehydroisoandrosterone 3′-sulphate (cat no. D5297), hematoxylin (cat no. H3136), anti-beta-actin (cat no. A2668) and goat anti-Mouse IgG (γ-chain specific)-HRP (cat no. A3673) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Inc., St Louis, MO, USA. Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (0.45 μm), ECL reagent kits (cat no. WBKLS0500), Protein-A-Agarose suspension (cat no. IP02) and goat anti-rabbit-HRP IgG (cat no.621140380011730) were procured from Merck-Millipore, Cedex, France. Other primary antibodies against phospho-Vav (Y174) (cat no. ab47282), phospho-Rac1/Cdc42 (S71) (cat no. ab5482) and Rac1 (cat no. ab33186) were purchased from Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA. Anti-Vav (cat no. sc132) and anti-Caveolin1 (cat no. sc894) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA. Non-fat milk (cat no.170-6404) and precision plus protein standard marker (cat no. 161-0374) were obtained from Bio-Rad Lab., Inc., Hercules, CA., USA. Protein assay kit (cat no. 23225) was procured from Thermo-Scientific, Rockford, USA. The G-LISA Rac1 activation assay Biochem Kit (cat no. BK128) was purchased from Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO, USA. Inhibin B Enzyme Immunoassay kit (cat no. EIA-INB-1) was purchased from RayBiotech, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA. 17 β-estradiol assay kit (cat no. ADI-900-008) was obtained from Enzo Life Science, Inc., Farmingdale New York, USA.

PCOS experimental animal model

The murine model of PCOS was developed by administering Mus musculus (strain C57/BL6) with dehydroisoandrosterone (DHEA). PCOS was induced in 22 days old mice (12 gm) by injecting DHEA (6 mg/100gm body weight; dissolved in 0.01 ml 95% ethanol, which was further diluted with corn oil) subcutaneously for 20 consecutive days as described previously [2528]. The model is characterized by higher levels of serum testosterone, androstenedione and 5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone similar to that seen in PCOS patients. Previous studies have established that the DHEA-PCOS murine model represents some of the salient features of human PCOS, such as hyperandrogenism, abnormal maturation of ovarian follicles and anovulation [26, 27, 2931]. We administered corn oil along with 95% ethanol in the control (sham) group. Animal usage and the protocols were duly approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of the CDRI, Lucknow, India. The animals were housed in a temperature-controlled facility (25 ± 1°C) with required illumination (12 h light and 12 h dark). Free access to food and water were provided to the animals. At the end of the experiments, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation followed by excision of ovaries, which were snap frozen at −80°C until further use. Each treatment/control group consisted of six animals.

Ovarian tissue histology and staining

To evaluate the histological alteration in the ovary, DHEA treated and sham/control ovaries were dissected and allowed to fix overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)-phosphate buffered saline (PBS). On subsequent day, tissue samples were kept in the tissue cassette and dehydrated using acetone (two times for 30 min each), acetone + benzene (1:1, 30 min) and cleared in benzene (two times for 30 min each). Subsequently, the tissues were removed and embedded in paraffin wax (Fisher Scientific, Rockford, USA) for 4 h at 65°C. This was followed by preparation of tissue paraffin moulds.

Embedded ovarian tissues were sectioned (5 μm) using microtome (Leica Biosystem, Germany) and mounted on poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) coated glass slides. Sections were deparaffinized with two changes of xylene (10 min each) and rehydrated with subsequent changes of absolute alcohol (two times, five min each), 95% (two min) and 70% alcohol (two min). Sections were briefly washed (three times) and stained with hematoxylin solution for eight min. After staining, sections were again washed and kept for blue color development in 1.5% ammonium hydroxide (30% stock) for 30 sec. The tissue section mounted slides were washed in distilled water for five min, rinsed in 95% alcohol (10 repeats) and counterstained with 0.5% eosin for 30 sec. This was followed by dehydration through 95% and absolute alcohol two times for five min each. Finally, the slides were cleared in xylene two times for five min each and mounted with DPX mountant. The tissue sections were imaged through Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope (TS100-F, Nikon, Japan) using 5.2 megapixels digital camera (DS-Fi2-U3, Nikon, Japan).

Ovarian protein extract preparation

After excision, the ovaries were processed for total (cytosol + plasma membrane) protein extract preparation. The ovarian tissue was minced and homogenized in a buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 3 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM PIPES, 1.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 50 g/ml, phosphatase, and protease inhibitors (pH-7.4) [32]. The tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min at 4°C to pellet-out unbroken cells and tissue debris. Later, the mitochondrial fraction was removed by centrifuging the preparation at 12,000 × g. The concentration of protein was estimated using Pierce BCA protein assay kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Suitable concentration (20μg) of protein extract was prepared for down-stream purposes.

Rac1 activity assay

The activity of Rac1 (GTP bound form) was assayed in the ovarian protein extract using G-LISA Rac1 activation assay Biochem Kit, as per the manufacturer’s instructions and that is already validated [33]. Briefly, a total of 50 μg protein extract was added to each corresponding well pre-coated with Rac-GTP-binding protein. This was incubated at 4°C for 30 min followed by successive incubation with 50 μl of anti-Rac1 for 45 min. Later, secondary antibody conjugated with HRP (50 μl) was incubated for 45 minutes. Subsequently, 50 μl of HRP detection reagent was added to each well, followed by incubation for another 20 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μl of HRP stop solution and the absorbance was recorded at 490 nm.

Inhibin B assay

The level of inhibin B was determined in the ovarian protein extract using RayBio Inhibin B Enzyme Immunoassay kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. We added 100 μl of inhibin B antibody in each well of micro-plate, which was pre-coated with anti-rabbit antibody. The plate was incubated overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. This was followed by the addition of 100 μl of protein sample to each well and incubation overnight at 4°C. HRP-Streptavidin was added followed by incubation at room temperature for 45 min. Subsequently, 100 μl of 5’-tetramethylbenzimide (TMB) was added as HRP detection reagent and incubated at room temperature in dark for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 50 μl stop solution and absorbance was recorded at 450 nm.

17 β-estradiol hormone estimation

The assay was performed as per instructions provided by the manufacturer. A total of 40 μg (100 μl) ovarian protein (n = 4; sample pooled from 10 animals to form 4 replicate in each group) was used for this assay. The standard of 17 β-estradiol was prepared by the addition of 100 μl standards (30,000 pg/ml, 7,500 pg/ml, 1,875 pg/ml, 468.8 pg/ml, 117.2 pg/ml and 29.3 pg/ml) and assay buffer3 (50 μl) into respective standard wells, whereas the standard diluent (100 μl) was added to well B0 (maximum binding well). The NSB (negative control) received standard diluents (100 μl), assay buffer3 (50 μl) and conjugate (phosphatase conjugated with 17β-estradiol) (50 μl). Blank was prepared by adding only substrate (200 μl) and stop solution (50 μl). Next, we added 50 μl of conjugate in all the wells except blank. Antibody against 17β-estradiol (50 μl) was added in wells B0, standard, and samples only followed by incubation of plate at room-temperature (RT) for 2 h. The unbound/excess content was decanted and micro-plate was washed thrice with 400 μl of wash buffer by gentle tapping on paper towel. Thereafter, a substrate (p-nitrophenyl phosphate; 200 μl) was added in each well followed by incubation at RT for 45 min. Finally, a stop solution (trisodium phosphate; 50 μl) was added to each well and micro-plate was read at 405 nm using micro-plate reader (SPECTRO star Nano, BMG LABTECH, GmbH, Germany). The graph was plotted with absorbance versus standards (17β-estradiol; pg/ml) after subtraction of NSB values. The concentration of 17β-estradiol was calculated based on the standard curve.

Co-immuno-precipitation assay

The ovarian protein lysate (100 μg, sham group) from each replicate was immuno-precipitated by incubation with anti-Vav overnight at 4°C. To collect the immune complexes, Protein-A-Agarose (20 μl) was added and the lysate-bead mixture was incubated at 4°C under rotary agitation for 4 h. It was followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and washing three times with PBS. Protein was eluted with Laemmli buffer and boiled for 5 min. The supernatant was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and immuno-blotted with anti-Rac1 according to a previously described method [32].

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

Protein sample (20 μg) was denatured by boiling in Laemmli buffer [34] for 5 min at 95°C and applied on a 10-12% SDS-PAGE. The proteins resolved on the gel were transferred to PVDF membrane (0.45 μm) in transfer buffer (20% methanol, vol/vol; 0.19 M glycine; 0.025 M Tris-Base, pH = 8.3) [35]. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk/goat serum and incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies against Rac1 (1:1000 dilution), pRac1 (1:1000 dilution), Vav (1:250 dilution), pVav (1:1000 dilution), Caveolin1 (1:1000 dilution) and beta-actin (1:6000 dilution). Thereafter, the membranes were incubated for one h with goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with Horseradish Peroxidase in a paraffin boat. Phosphate buffered saline (10 mM, pH 7.4 containing 0.1% Tween-20, PBS-T) was used throughout the procedure. Later, the membranes were exposed to ECL reagents to visualize the protein bands and imaged through Chemi-Imager (ImageQuant LAS4000, Buckinghamshire, UK). Immuno-positive bands were analyzed by densitometry using Total Lab Quant 1D software (Nonlinear Dynamics Ltd., UK). The beta-actin blot values were used to normalize the blots value of Rac1, pRac1, Caveolin1, Vav and pVav.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were performed in three replicates using six animals in each group. Ovarian tissue samples were pooled from two animals to form one replicates to increase the yield of protein extract. Protein band intensities were averaged and the standard error of the mean (SE) was calculated. The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA using Microsoft Excel 2007. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant for statistical inference.

Results

Characterization of PCOS by histological analysis

To demonstrate the effect of DHEA, ovaries were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin/eosin. Ovarian sections of control (sham) group showed the presence of follicles at different stages of maturation (Figure 1). Atretic, graffian and healthy follicles were clearly visible along with corpora lutea (Figure 1A). The presence of healthy oocytes in the follicles was seen (Figure 1C). In contrast, DHEA treated ovary exhibited a bit distorted morphology (Figure 1B). The numbers of antral and pre-natal follicles were increased with arrangement typically that of the polycystic ovary; however, the granulosa cells appeared to be degenerated (Figure 1D). The size of the polycystic ovary was increased, perhaps due to an increase in the number of follicles. Oocytes and corpora-lutea were not seen in the polycystic ovary.
Figure 1

Morphological comparison of DHEA treated mouse ovary with its control. Sham/vehicle ovary showing (4x magnification) corpus luteum and secondary follicle (A and C), DHEA treated PCOS ovary showing (10× magnification) follicular cyst (FC) along with degenerate granulosa cells (B and D). Corpus-luteum was completely absent in polycystic ovary.

Increased expression level of inhibin B in polycystic ovary

The level of inhibin B correlates with the number of follicles recruited to undergo maturation [36]. Earlier studies have reported high concentrations of serum inhibin B in polycystic ovaries [3739]. Herein, we performed assay of inhibin B in ovarian tissue protein extract to validate the pathophysiology of PCOS in our animal model. We observed a significant increase (p < 0.015) in level of inhibin B in the polycystic ovaries in comparison to sham (control) ovaries. Our result showed ~61% elevation in the level of inhibin B (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

Level of inhibin B and 17β-estradiol in sham and DHEA treated mouse ovary. The intra-ovarian level of inhibin B (A) and 17-β-estradiol (B) were assessed post treatment of DHEA/sham in mouse.

Elevated level of 17 β-estradiol in the PCOS ovary

Serum level of 17β-estradiol (E2) indicates the development of dominant follicles [36]. Therefore, we analyzed intra-ovarian level of 17β-estradiol in the PCOS and control groups. We observed about three folds elevation in the level of estradiol in PCOS ovary in comparison to the control ovary (p < 0.03) (Figure 2B).

Down regulation of activity and expression of Rac1 in PCOS ovary

In order to decipher the possible involvement of Rac1 signaling in PCOS, we detected the expression level of Rac1 and phosphorylated-Rac1 (S71) (pRac1) in the ovarian tissue protein extract prepared from the experimental model of PCOS. As shown in Figure 3A, compared with the sham/vehicle treated ovaries, the activity level of Rac1 was significantly decreased in the PCOS ovary. Similarly, the expression level of Rac1 protein was significantly down-regulated in DHEA treated/PCOS ovary (Figure 3B and C).
Figure 3

Determination of expression and activity of Rac1 in DHEA induced PCOS ovary. Relative activity of Rac1 was analyzed in the DHEA (PCOS) and sham treated ovary (A). Expression level analysis of Rac1 was determined by immuno-blotting and densitometry in the ovary of PCOS and sham (B and C). The activity Rac1was assayed by analysis of its phosphorylated form (D and E).

Further, to determine whether the activity of Rac1 in terms of its phosphorylation was affected in the DHEA treated (polycystic) ovary, the phosphorylation level of Rac1 was analyzed employing immuno-blotting. Treatment of ovary with DHEA resulted in down-regulation of pRac1 (Figure 3D and E). Thus, this domain of information suggests that DHEA/polycystic ovary may adversely affect the activity of Rac1.

Association of Vav activity in PCOS ovary

Rac1 is activated by Vav, which gets phosphorylated at tyrosine (Y) 174 [40]. To evaluate whether DHEA can also modulate of intra-ovarian activity of Rac1, we further evaluated the activity and expression level of Vav in the ovary after DHEA treatment (polycystic ovary). The activity of Vav in terms of its phosphorylation was analyzed through phosphorylation assay/Western blots (Figure 4). We found reduced expression level of total Vav in the hyper-androgenized ovary, but the difference in comparison to control was not statistically significant (Figure 4A and B). Similarly, the intensity of anti-pVav (Y174) positive band was found to be lower in PCOS in comparison to the control (sham) group (p > 0.05) (Figure 4C and D).
Figure 4

Vav and pVav expression analysis in the PCOS and sham ovary. Phosphorylated-Vav (pVav) was studied in the PCOS (DHEA treated) ovary (A and B) using Western blotting. Expression level of total Vav and pVav were analyzed using densitometry (C and D).

Vav can interact with Rac1 in ovary

It is well known that Vav displays guanidine exchange factor activity for Rho GTPases. We performed co-immuno-precipitation analysis to confirm the Rac1 association with Vav in the sham ovary. The Vav presence in the Vav antibody IP was confirmed by its immuno-blotting (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5B, the immuno-precipitated protein samples by Vav antibody from the ovary of sham administered displayed immuno-positive band of Rac1, which is an indication that Rac1 interacts with Vav in the ovary.
Figure 5

Analysis of Rac1 and Vav interaction in the ovary. Lysate from PCOS ovary was processed for Vav immuno-precipitation followed by immuno-blotting with Rac1 antibody (A); presence of Rac1 in the Vav IP was confirmed by its immuno-blotting (B).

Caveolin1 is up-regulated in PCOS ovary

Caveolin1 is known to be an important scaffolding domain containing caveolae protein, which is involved in the regulation of several signaling cascades [41]. Since, Caveolin1 is linked to Rac1 degradation pathway, we investigated the expression level of Caveolin1 in the ovarian samples. We observed a significantly increased level of Caveolin1 in PCOS ovary in comparison to the control (sham) group (Figure 6A and B).
Figure 6

Evaluation of expression of Caveolin1 in the DHEA and sham treated ovary. Immuno-blotting of Caveolin1 was performed in PCOS and sham ovary group in comparison to the control group (A); Densitometric analysis of Cav1 in PCOS and control group (B).

Discussion

Intra-ovarian signaling stimulates some of the primordial follicles to grow out of a cohort. The quiescent follicles remain in the inactive stage due to inhibitory mechanism operational either within the follicles or by the signals from the ovary [3]. During the post-natal development in mice, a large number of oocytes/follicles are depleted in comparison to the growing population of follicles [42, 43]. This phenomenon is similar in the humans as well [3] and depletion of the pool of primodial follicles compromises female fertility. The condition of follicle insufficiency to ovulate is not understood precisely. Previous studies have demonstrated the association of Ras and Rho signaling in the process of ovarian follicle development [4348]. Rac1 is a member of the Ras family, making it a good candidate for investigation of its role in the regulation of follicular maturation.

The presence of multiple cysts in the ovaries are considered as a key diagnostic trait of PCOS [4951], which was precisely mimicked in our PCOS mice model. This provided us with a platform for further biochemical and expression analysis. Our histological findings in PCOS ovary correlated well with the earlier reports showing increased ovarian size, absence of ovum and corpus-luteum in the ovaries of DHEA treated mice [52]. A relation between decrease in ovarian volume and the number of follicles with age of women with PCOS has been shown [53]. Increased level of inhibin B and 17β-estradiol in the PCOS group demonstrated elevation in the number of recruited dormant follicles in comparison to the control ovary [36]. Collectively, this confirmed a phenotype of polycystic ovary in our model system.

The estradiol negatively affects Rac1 activation [14], and in turn Rac1 regulates inhibin B [54]; however, this is not known in the ovarian tissue. Rac is a member of small G-protein family (RhoGTPase) and other member of this G-protein family, Ras, has already been implicated in the pathophysiology of ovary [11]. A previous study has suggested involvement of Rac1in gonad formation [12], but its association with follicular maturation and function has not been shown. Our results suggested that expression of Rac1, pRac1 and its activity were significantly reduced in the hyperandrogenized ovary with DHEA (polycystic ovary). Activity of Rac1 was also lowered as compared to sham. It has been reported that higher production of estrogen in vascular smooth muscle cells causes down-regulation of Rac1 [14]. We observed a similar combination of elevated level of intra-ovarian 17β-estradiol and down-regulation of Rac1 on polycystic ovary. Further to confirm the involvement of Rac1, we studied the expression level of total Vav along with its phosphorylated form, which is a known activator of Rac1 [24]. As expected, we observed a reduction in total Vav and its phosphorylated form. The association between Rac1-Vav was further confirmed by immuno-precipitation (IP), which showed Rac1 presence in the immuno-precipitates prepared using anti-Vav from sham treated group. Collectively, all the above results suggest that elevated 17β-estradiol levels might have down-regulated the activity/expression of Rac1 and Vav favoring the development of PCOS phenotype.

Several studies have also shown the interaction of Rac1 with caveolae protein, Caveolin1. Caveolin1 is known to control Rac1 protein levels by regulating ubiquitylation and degradation of activated Rac1 in an adhesion-dependent fashion [55]. The absence of Caveolin1 has been reported to increase the proliferation and anchorage-independent growth by a Rac-dependent, Erk-independent mechanism [56]. Since, there is no evidence that Caveolin1 regulates Rac1 in the ovarian tissue, particularly in PCOS, we analyzed the expression of Caveolin1. A higher level of caveolin1 in PCOS ovary might have signaled a decrease in Rac1 and Vav levels that favors the development of PCOS phenotype. However, this is purely a speculation and further evidence is required to conclude the exact role of Caveolin1 in pathophysiology of PCOS. Rac1 and Caveolin1 are known to associate during cell proliferation signaling [56]; however, Caveolin1 antagonizing function for Rac1 activity in PCOS pathophysiology needs further validation. Herein, our study can infer that Caveolin1 is dysregulated in the PCOS ovary.

On the basis of our observations, we propose that increased androgens levels result in enhanced conversion of estradiol that initiates a series of events leading to the condition of PCOS. It is perhaps increased 17β-estradiol level that results in down regulation of Rac1 and Vav, ultimately, resulting in suspension of follicular development. This leads to arrest of follicular development, and promotes the to accumulation of immature follicles typical to PCOS ovaries. Elevated level of inhibin B is an indicator of repeated recruitment of follicles in the developmental process that is suspended before follicular maturation. How increased 17β-estradiol levels act on Rac/Vav needs to be studied further.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate for the first time diminished activity of Rac1 and Vav in hyperandrogenized mouse ovaries. Our findings might provide some explanation through small G-protein in the pathogenesis of follicular hyperplasia in PCOS. Altogether, these observations suggest a contribution of elevated estradiol and inhibin B levels due to the DHEA in pathophysiology of PCOS.

Authors’ information

Abbreviations

PCOS: 

Polycystic ovarian syndrome

DHEA: 

Dehydroepiandrosterone

CL: 

Corpus luteum

FC: 

Follicle cyst

MS: 

Metabolic syndrome

PVDF: 

Polyvinylidene fluoride

ECL: 

Enhanced chemiluminescence

HRP: 

Horseradish peroxidase

Cat: 

Catalogue

h: 

Hour

PFA: 

Paraformaldehyde

PBS: 

Phosphate buffer saline

RhoA: 

Ras homolog gene family member A

Cdc42: 

Cell division control protein 42 homolog

Rac: 

Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate

LH: 

Luteinizing hormone

IP: 

Immuno-precipitation.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge help of Mr. Geet Kumar Nagar in the histopathology and laboratory facilities of Dr. Anila Dwivedi. CSIR-CDRI manuscript number is 203/2012/RKJ.

Grant support

This research work received support from BSC0101Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi India.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Endocrinology, Life Science North 111B/101, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute
(2)
Division of Endocrinology, Life Science South, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute

References

  1. Adhikari D, Liu K: Molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of mammalian primordial follicles. Endocr Rev 2009, 30: 438–464. 10.1210/er.2008-0048View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hirshfield AN: Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol 1991, 124: 43–101. 43–101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. McGee EA, Hsueh AJ: Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev 2000, 21: 200–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R: Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011, 7: 219–231. 10.1038/nrendo.2010.217View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Petrikova J, Lazurova I: Ovarian failure and polycystic ovary syndrome. Autoimmun Rev 2012, 11: A471-A478. 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang S, Alvero R: Racial and ethnic differences in physiology and clinical symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome. Semin Reprod Med 2013, 31: 365–369. 10.1055/s-0033-1348895View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shayya R, Chang RJ: Reproductive endocrinology of adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome. BJOG 2010, 117: 150–155. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02421.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks S, Gharani N, Waterworth D, Batty S, White D, Williamson R, McCarthy M: The genetic basis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 1997, 12: 2641–2648. 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2641View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahsar-Miller M, Azziz R: The development of the polycystic ovary syndrome: family history as a risk factor. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1998, 9: 55–58. 10.1016/S1043-2760(98)00021-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharya SM: Metabolic syndrome in females with polycystic ovary syndrome and International Diabetes Federation criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008, 34: 62–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan HY, Richards JS: Minireview: physiological and pathological actions of RAS in the ovary. Mol Endocrinol 2010, 24: 286–298. 10.1210/me.2009-0251PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee M, Shen B, Schwarzbauer JE, Ahn J, Kwon J: Connections between integrins and Rac GTPase pathways control gonad formation and function in C. elegans. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005, 1723: 248–255. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.01.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cailleteau L, Estrach S, Thyss R, Boyer L, Doye A, Domange B, Johnsson N, Rubinstein E, Boucheix C, Ebrahimian T, Silvestre JS, Lemichez E, Meneguzzi G, Mettouchi A: alpha2beta1 integrin controls association of Rac with the membrane and triggers quiescence of endothelial cells. J Cell Sci 2010, 123: 2491–2501. 10.1242/jcs.058875View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Laufs U, Adam O, Strehlow K, Wassmann S, Konkol C, Laufs K, Schmidt W, Bohm M, Nickenig G: Down-regulation of Rac-1 GTPase by Estrogen. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 5956–5962. 10.1074/jbc.M209813200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Abramovici H, Mojtabaie P, Parks RJ, Zhong XP, Koretzky GA, Topham MK, Gee SH: Diacylglycerol kinase zeta regulates actin cytoskeleton reorganization through dissociation of Rac1 from RhoGDI. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20: 2049–2059. 10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1248PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sauzeau V, Sevilla MA, Montero MJ, Bustelo XR: The Rho/Rac exchange factor Vav2 controls nitric oxide-dependent responses in mouse vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest 2010, 120: 315–330. 10.1172/JCI38356PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karlsson AB, Maizels ET, Flynn MP, Jones JC, Shelden EA, Bamburg JR, Hunzicker-Dunn M: Luteinizing hormone receptor-stimulated progesterone production by preovulatory granulosa cells requires protein kinase A-dependent activation/dephosphorylation of the actin dynamizing protein cofilin. Mol Endocrinol 2010, 24: 1765–1781. 10.1210/me.2009-0487PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bristow JM, Sellers MH, Majumdar D, Anderson B, Hu L, Webb DJ: The Rho-family GEF Asef2 activates Rac to modulate adhesion and actin dynamics and thereby regulate cell migration. J Cell Sci 2009, 122: 4535–4546. 10.1242/jcs.053728PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mettouchi A, Klein S, Guo W, Lopez-Lago M, Lemichez E, Westwick JK, Giancotti FG: Integrin-specific activation of Rac controls progression through the G(1) phase of the cell cycle. Mol Cell 2001, 8: 115–127. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00285-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrett TA, Van Buul JD, Burridge K: VEGF-induced Rac1 activation in endothelial cells is regulated by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav2. Exp Cell Res 2007, 313: 3285–3297. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.05.027PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vedham V, Phee H, Coggeshall KM: Vav activation and function as a rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor in macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced macrophage chemotaxis. Mol Cell Biol 2005, 25: 4211–4220. 10.1128/MCB.25.10.4211-4220.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shyu KG, Chua SK, Wang BW, Kuan P: Mechanism of inhibitory effect of atorvastatin on resistin expression induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha in macrophages. J Biomed Sci 2009, 16: 50. 50 10.1186/1423-0127-16-50PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Aoukaty A, Tan R: Role for glycogen synthase kinase-3 in NK cell cytotoxicity and X-linked lymphoproliferative disease. J Immunol 2005, 174: 4551–4558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Crespo P, Schuebel KE, Ostrom AA, Gutkind JS, Bustelo XR: Phosphotyrosine-dependent activation of Rac-1 GDP/GTP exchange by the vav proto-oncogene product. Nature 1997, 385: 169–172. 10.1038/385169a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elia E, Sander V, Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Di GG, Gonzalez C, Motta AB: The mechanisms involved in the action of metformin in regulating ovarian function in hyperandrogenized mice. Mol Hum Reprod 2006, 12: 475–481. 10.1093/molehr/gal057View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Sander V, Arcos ML, Gonzalez C, Di GG, Chiocchio S, Cremaschi G, Motta AB: Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone on ovarian cystogenesis and immune function. J Reprod Immunol 2004, 64: 59–74. 10.1016/j.jri.2004.04.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sander V, Luchetti CG, Solano ME, Elia E, Di GG, Gonzalez C, Motta AB: Role of the N, N'-dimethylbiguanide metformin in the treatment of female prepuberal BALB/c mice hyperandrogenized with dehydroepiandrosterone. Reproduction 2006, 131: 591–602. 10.1530/rep.1.00941View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu JQ, Zhu L, Liang XW, Xing FQ, Schatten H, Sun QY: Demethylation of LHR in dehydroepiandrosterone-induced mouse model of polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod 2010, 16: 260–266. 10.1093/molehr/gap089View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Anderson E, Lee MT, Lee GY: Cystogenesis of the ovarian antral follicle of the rat: ultrastructural changes and hormonal profile following the administration of dehydroepiandrosterone. Anat Rec 1992, 234: 359–382. 10.1002/ar.1092340307View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Henmi H, Endo T, Nagasawa K, Hayashi T, Chida M, Akutagawa N, Iwasaki M, Kitajima Y, Kiya T, Nishikawa A, Manase K, Kudo R: Lysyl oxidase and MMP-2 expression in dehydroepiandrosterone-induced polycystic ovary in rats. Biol Reprod 2001, 64: 157–162. 10.1095/biolreprod64.1.157View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee GY, Croop JM, Anderson E: Multidrug resistance gene expression correlates with progesterone production in dehydroepiandrosterone-induced polycystic and equine chorionic gonadotropin-stimulated ovaries of prepubertal rats. Biol Reprod 1998, 58: 330–337. 10.1095/biolreprod58.2.330View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurya VK, Jha RK, Kumar V, Joshi A, Chadchan S, Mohan JJ, Laloraya M: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-B1) liberation from its latent complex during embryo implantation and its regulation by estradiol in mouse. Biol Reprod 2013, 89: 84. 10.1095/biolreprod.112.106542View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayashida T, Jones JC, Lee CK, Schnaper HW: Loss of beta1-integrin enhances TGF-beta1-induced collagen expression in epithelial cells via increased alphavbeta3-integrin and Rac1 activity. J Biol Chem 2010, 285: 30741–30751. 10.1074/jbc.M110.105700PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227: 680–685. 10.1038/227680a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. 1979. Biotechnology 1992, 24: 145–149. 145–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Eldar-Geva T, Robertson DM, Cahir N, Groome N, Gabbe MP, Maclachlan V, Healy DL: Relationship between serum inhibin A and B and ovarian follicle development after a daily fixed dose administration of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85: 607–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Anderson RA, Groome NP, Baird DT: Inhibin A and inhibin B in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome during treatment with FSH to induce mono-ovulation. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998, 48: 577–584. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00442.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Dafopoulos K, Venetis C, Messini CI, Pournaras S, Anifandis G, Garas A, Messinis IE: Inhibin secretion in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome before and after treatment with progesterone. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011, 9: 59. doi: 10.1186/1477–7827–9-59.: 59 10.1186/1477-7827-9-59PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockwood GM, Muttukrishna S, Groome NP, Matthews DR, Ledger WL: Mid-follicular phase pulses of inhibin B are absent in polycystic ovarian syndrome and are initiated by successful laparoscopic ovarian diathermy: a possible mechanism regulating emergence of the dominant follicle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998, 83: 1730–1735. 10.1210/jcem.83.5.4756View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong H, Zhao B, Shi H, Ba X, Wang X, Jiang Y, Zeng X: c-Abl tyrosine kinase plays a critical role in beta2 integrin-dependent neutrophil migration by regulating Vav1 activity. J Leukoc Biol 2013, 93: 611–622. 10.1189/jlb.1012487View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Minshall RD, Sessa WC, Stan RV, Anderson RG, Malik AB: Caveolin regulation of endothelial function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2003, 285: L1179-L1183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bristol-Gould SK, Kreeger PK, Selkirk CG, Kilen SM, Mayo KE, Shea LD, Woodruff TK: Fate of the initial follicle pool: empirical and mathematical evidence supporting its sufficiency for adult fertility. Dev Biol 2006, 298: 149–154. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Faddy MJ, Telfer E, Gosden RG: The kinetics of pre-antral follicle development in ovaries of CBA/Ca mice during the first 14 weeks of life. Cell Tissue Kinet 1987, 20: 551–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fan HY, Liu Z, Mullany LK, Richards JS: Consequences of RAS and MAPK activation in the ovary: the good, the bad and the ugly. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012, 356: 74–79. 10.1016/j.mce.2011.12.005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hackney JF, Pucci C, Naes E, Dobens L: Ras signaling modulates activity of the ecdysone receptor EcR during cell migration in the Drosophila ovary. Dev Dyn 2007, 236: 1213–1226. 10.1002/dvdy.21140View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee T, Montell DJ: Multiple Ras signals pattern the Drosophila ovarian follicle cells. Dev Biol 1997, 185: 25–33. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8537View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yodoi R, Tamba S, Morimoto K, Segi-Nishida E, Nishihara M, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y: RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in the cumulus mediates extracellular matrix assembly. Endocrinology 2009, 150: 3345–3352. 10.1210/en.2008-1449PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vlachos S, Harden N: Genetic evidence for antagonism between Pak protein kinase and Rho1 small GTPase signaling in regulation of the actin cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis. Genetics 2011, 187: 501–512. 10.1534/genetics.110.120998PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Dunaif A, Thomas A: Current concepts in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Annu Rev Med 2001, 52: 401–419. 401–19 10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ehrmann DA: Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005, 352: 1223–1236. 10.1056/NEJMra041536View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS, Hickey TE: Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 2007, 370: 685–697. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61345-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Aragno M, Brignardello E, Tamagno E, Gatto V, Danni O, Boccuzzi G: Dehydroepiandrosterone administration prevents the oxidative damage induced by acute hyperglycemia in rats. J Endocrinol 1997, 155: 233–240. 10.1677/joe.0.1550233View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Alsamarai S, Adams JM, Murphy MK, Post MD, Hayden DL, Hall JE, Welt CK: Criteria for polycystic ovarian morphology in polycystic ovary syndrome as a function of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94: 4961–4970. 10.1210/jc.2009-0839PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Citterio C, Menacho-Marquez M, Garcia-Escudero R, Larive RM, Barreiro O, Sanchez-Madrid F, Paramio JM, Bustelo XR: The rho exchange factors vav2 and vav3 control a lung metastasis-specific transcriptional program in breast cancer cells. Sci Signal 2012, 5: ra71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Nethe M, Hordijk PL: The role of ubiquitylation and degradation in RhoGTPase signalling. J Cell Sci 2010, 123: 4011–4018. 10.1242/jcs.078360View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cerezo A, Guadamillas MC, Goetz JG, Sanchez-Perales S, Klein E, Assoian RK, del Pozo MA: The absence of caveolin-1 increases proliferation and anchorage- independent growth by a Rac-dependent, Erk-independent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 2009, 29: 5046–5059. 10.1128/MCB.00315-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Maurya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.