Open Access

Icb-1 gene polymorphism rs1467465 is associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer

  • Susanne Schüler1,
  • Claus Lattrich1,
  • Maciej Skrzypczak2,
  • Tanja Fehm3,
  • Olaf Ortmann1 and
  • Oliver Treeck1Email author
Journal of Ovarian Research20147:42

DOI: 10.1186/1757-2215-7-42

Received: 8 October 2013

Accepted: 6 April 2014

Published: 23 April 2014

Abstract

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of differentiation-associated human gene icb-1 (C1orf38) may be associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility. For this purpose, we compared the genotype and allele frequencies of the SNPs rs1467465 and rs12048235 in a group of 184 ovarian cancer patients with a control group of 184 age- and gender-matched women without any malignancy. Genotype-phenotype association revealed that A allele of SNP rs1467465 was more frequent in ovarian cancer patients than in the control group (0.40 vs. 0.33, OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.013-1.853, p = 0.04). After analysis of allele positivity we observed that A-positive genotypes were more frequent in the ovarian cancer group (0.65 vs. 0.53, OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.072-2.483, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the heterozygous genotype of rs1467465 was found to be more frequent in the patients group (0.50 vs. 0.41, OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.045-2.045, p = 0.03). No significant results were obtained with regard to SNP rs1204823. Our data suggest, that SNP rs1467465 of human gene icb-1 might affect susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer icb-1 gene Single nucleotide polymorphism Case control study

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy and the sixth most common cancer among women in industrialized countries [1]. Because of its potential for aggressive local invasion and the lack of sensitive early screening methods, around 75% of all ovarian cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Despite extensive research during the last decades, the etiology and pathogenesis of this tumor entity is only partly understood. Binding of steroid hormones like estrogens to their receptors like estrogen receptor α (ERα) is known to stimulate growth of ovarian cancer cells [2, 3]. Recently we reported interaction between ERα and differentiation-associated gene icb-1 (Themis2, C1orf38) in ovarian cells [4, 5]. Icb-1 is a vertebrate gene located on human chromosome 1 (1p35.3), which was identified and cloned by our group in an attempt to analyze gene expression changes during in vitro differentiation of endometrial tumor cells [6]. Recent studies suggested icb-1 to act as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer - its knockdown accelerated growth of various ovarian cancer cell lines and led to upregulation of ovarian cancer markers like CLDN16 and KLK10 [7]. Icb-1 seems to suppress progression of ovarian cancer by inhibition of oncogenic pathways activated by ERα. Thus, the individual level of icb-1 expression, which can be assumed to result from different epigenetical, but also genetical factors like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), might affect ovarian cancer risk.

Today, only 5–10% of ovarian cancer cases have been shown to be hereditary [8]. However, further polymorphisms in crucial genes are expected to affect susceptibility to ovarian cancer [9]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most frequent sequence variations in the human genome. SNPs located in exon regions may alter protein function, whereas SNPs in the gene promoter can modify gene expression levels [915]. In the last years, a multitude of genotype-phenotype association studies have been published examining the significance of randomly chosen SNPs in different hormone-dependent diseases [12, 1620].

To test the relevance of two SNPs of icb-1 gene for susceptibility to ovarian cancer, we genotyped 184 women with ovarian cancer and just as many women without any malignancy.

Patients and methods

Patients

In this study we used blood samples from 184 Caucasian women with sporadic ovarian cancer and a median age at diagnosis of 60.7. The gender-matched control group contained the same number of Caucasian women without any malignancy at the beginning of the study and a median age at inclusion of 60.8. We included ovarian cancer blood samples collected in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University of Regensburg, serum samples from the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University of Tübingen, Germany and further blood samples from the Second Department of Gynecology of the University School of Medicine of Lublin, Poland. Generally, Caucasian women with sporadic ovarian cancer and available information on grading, stage, and histological subtype from 2002 to 2012 were included. The histopathological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board “Ethikkommission der Universität Regensburg and by the Institutional Review Boards of the Universities Tübingen and Lublin”.
Table 1

Staging and histopathological characteristics of ovarian cancer cases (n = 184)

Characteristics

Patient numbers

FIGO staging

 

 Stage I

38

 Stage II

13

 Stage III

89

 Stage IV

37

 unknown

7

Histological subtype

 

 serous

126

 endometrioid

36

 mucinous

17

 clear cell

7

 transitional cell

2

 undifferentiated

8

Histological grade

 

 G1

24

 G2

49

 G3

111

SNP analysis

SNPs in the icb-1 gene were selected using the internet web sites http://www.genecards.org. and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP. Intronic polymorphism rs1467465 is located at position 28083990 of chromosome 1, between icb-1 exons 4 and 5 and rs12048235 is located at position 28078471 of the same chromosome, in the intron between exons 2 and 3.

Genomic DNA was isolated from 100 μl EDTA-blood after addition of 300 μl of lysis buffer (1% v/v TritonX, 0.32 M Sucrose, 0.01 M Tris (pH 7.5) and 5 mM MgCl2) and two-fold centrifugation (13000 g) for 30 seconds. Pellet was resuspended in 50 μl PCR buffer (GoTaq buffer, Promega, Madison, USA) containing 0.5% Tween 20 and 10 mAnson units proteinase K (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) followed by incubation at 50°C over night and finally heat inactivation of the enzyme for 10 min at 95°C. The genomic DNA-containing lysate was subjected to a tetra-primer ARMS PCR approach [10] allowing allele-specific amplification using the PCR primers listed in Table 2 (synthesized at Metabion, Martinsried, Germany). For this purpose, to 100 ng of genomic DNA, 2 μl of 5 x GoTaq buffer, 0.2 μl of dNTP Mix (10 mM) (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany), 0.2 μl of each PCR primer (10 μM) and 0.5 units GoTaq polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA) was added and PCR reaction was carried out using a Biometra T1 thermocycler (Goettingen, Germany). PCR program was 10 min 94°C followed by 38 PCR cycles of 94°C (30 sec), 56°C (30 sec) and 72°C (60 sec), followed by a final extension for 5 min step at 72°C. PCR products were analysed by means of 1.5% agarose gelelectrophoresis.
Table 2

PCR primers used for SNP analysis

Polymorphism

Primer

Sequence

rs1467465

IP1

GCAGACGTCATGTAGCATCTGGCCCA

IP2

GAAAGAGGACTTCCATTGCGTTCCCCAAC

OP1

AGGGAGCTGTGCCGCACACTCTGTAAAG

OP2

GGAGACAGGGTGTTCCTGGGATTTTCCA

rs12048235

IP1

GAAGTCTAGTGTGTCTGTCAGGGAATTTG

IP2

ACCAGAGACACAGAGAATGGAAGAGGTAT

OP1

GGAGGAAAGGCTAAGATGGCAGTTAG

OP2

ATGACAGATTTGCATCTGGACATCTG

Statistical analysis

Deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was estimated by the Fisher’s exact test and the χ2 test, and all values were subjected to one-way ANOVA to achieve homogeneity of variance. Statistical tests for association (C.I.: 95% confidence interval) and for significance were carried out using SPSS for Windows 8.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. After tests for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were conducted, allele frequency, allele positiviy and genotype frequencies were determined. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the more frequent homozygous genotypes as reference group.

Results

Genotype analysis

After genotyping of 184 ovarian cancer patients and such as many women without any malignancy, we observed a higher frequency of heterozygous AG genotype of the icb-1 gene SNP rs1467465 in the patients group. Genotype-phenotype association suggested that the heterozygous genotype of rs1467465 could be a risk factor for the development of ovarian cancer (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.045-2.045, p = 0.03) (Table 3). The frequency of the homozygous genotypes did not differ significantly between both groups in this study. Moreover, no significant differences between healthy women and women with ovarian cancer were found for the heterozygous/homozygous frequencies of the icb- 1 gene SNP rs12048235 in this study (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of SNP genotypes between ovarian cancer patients and women without any malignancy

rs1467465

Genotype frequency

Allele frequency

Allele positivity

 

GG

AA

AG

G

A

G

A

Cases

0.35

0.15

0.50

0.60

0.40

0.85

0.65

Controls

0.47

0.13

0.41

0.67

0.33

0.88

0.53

P

 

0.13

0.03

 

0.04

 

0.02

OR

 

n.s.

1.63

 

1.37

 

1.632

C.I. 95 %

 

n.s.

1.045-2.045

 

1.013-1.853

 

1.072-2.483

rs12048235

Genotype frequency

Allele frequency

Allele positivity

 

GG

AA

AG

G

A

G

A

Cases

0.42

0.12

0.46

0.65

0.35

0.88

0.58

Controls

0.42

0.15

0.45

0.63

0.37

0.85

0.59

P

 

0.48

0.87

 

0.61

 

0.90

OR

 

n.s.

n.s.

 

n.s.

 

n.s.

C.I. 95 %

 

n.s.

n.s.

 

n.s.

 

n.s.

After tests for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were conducted, allele frequency, allele positivity and genotype frequencies were determined. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the more frequent homozygous genotypes as reference group. Bold p-values were considered to be statistically significant. n.s.=not significant.

Allele frequency

When we analysed the allele frequencies of the icb-1 gene SNPs we found that in women with ovarian cancer the A allele of SNP rs1467465 was carried significantly more often than in women without an ovarian malignancy (0.40 vs. 0.33, OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.013-1-853, p = 0.04) (Table 3). Ovarian cancer patients exhibited significantly less G-positive alleles of this SNP. We were not able to show any significant differences between healthy women and women with ovarian cancer in the allele positivity analysis of the icb-1 gene SNP rs12048235 (Table 3).

Allele positivity

Phenotype-genotype association analyses of allele positivity of the icb-1 gene SNPs revealed that A allele positivity of SNP rs1467465 was more frequent in patients with ovarian cancer than in the control group of healthy women (0.65 vs. 0.53, OR 1.632, 95% CI 1.072-2.483, p = 0.02) (Table 3). G positive alleles were less exhibited in patients with ovarian cancer. We did not find any significant difference between healthy women and women with ovarian cancer in allele positivity analyses of the icb-1 gene SNP rs12048235 (Table 3).

Discussion

Our data suggest SNP rs467465 in icb-1 gene to affect susceptibility to ovarian cancer. The vertebrate gene icb-1 previously has been shown to inhibit growth of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and to suppress expression of ovarian cancer biomarkers like kallikrein-related peptidase 10 and claudin 16 or other cancer-related genes activated by estrogens or TNFα [7]. Furthermore, knockdown of icb-1 was shown to inhibit induction of differentiation-associated genes like E-cadherin triggered by vitamin D3 or all-trans retinoic acid. Loss of icb-1 expression previously was sufficient to transform the estrogen-unresponsive ovarian cancer cell line SK-OV-3 into a line exhibiting a strong proliferative response to estrogen stimuli [5]. Icb-1 gene contains an imperfect estrogen response element (ERE) and transcript levels of icb-1 were shown to be estrogen-responsive in ovarian cancer cells in an estrogen receptor α (ERα)-dependent manner [4]. Estrogens are able to promote ovarian tumor progression [21], which is associated with loss of cellular differentiation. Thus, women carrying the minor frequent allele or genotype of SNP rs1467465, which might lead to decreased icb-1 function, are suggested to be less sensitive to the antitumoral effects of vitamin D3 and all-trans retinoic acid, but more sensitive to the oncogenic effects triggered by estrogens or TNFα.

In this study, we examined intronic polymorphisms without clear functional relevance, because icb-1 gene does not exhibit SNPs in exons or in transcription factor binding sites. Numerous studies reported an association between intronic SNPs and disease risk [2224]. Intronic SNPs could affect intronic splicing enhancer or silencer signals and thereby modulate the expression of different splice variants [25]. This report is the first one analysing the association of icb-1 gene SNPs rs1467465 and rs12048235 with ovarian cancer risk. Recently, we were able to show that the SNP rs1467465 might affect breast cancer susceptibility, which might corroborate the data presented here [26]. The results of the genotype-phenotype association study we performed clearly demonstrated that the heterozygous genotype of SNP rs1467465, the A-allele and A-positive genotypes were more frequent in ovarian cancer patients and thus might be risk factors for this disease. The general low odds ratios reveal that the effects of the gene polymorphism are low, as expected from a complex etiology.

Taken together, the results of this study suggest that a SNP in human icb-1 gene might be able to affect susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Our data encourage further studies examining the relevance of icb-1 gene in ovarian cancer and combining analysis of rs467465 with other polymorphisms affecting ovarian cancer risk.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Helena Lowack for excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg
(2)
Second Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin
(3)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tübingen

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011, 61: 69–90. 10.3322/caac.20107View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Langdon SP, Hirst GL, Miller EP, Hawkins RA, Tesdale AL, Smyth JF, Miller WR: The regulation of growth and protein expression by estrogen in vitro: a study of 8 human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1994, 50: 131–135. 10.1016/0960-0760(94)90019-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Galtier-Dereure F, Capony F, Maudelonde T, Rochefort H: Estradiol stimulates cell growth and secretion of procathepsin D and a 120-kilodalton protein in the human ovarian cancer cell line BG-1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992, 75: 1497–1502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollmann J, Ortmann O, Treeck O: Expression of differentiation-associated gene icb-1 is estrogen-responsive in ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2008, 109: 16–21. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.12.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Konwisorz A, Springwald A, Haselberger M, Goerse R, Ortmann O, Treeck O: Knockdown of ICB-1 gene enhanced estrogen responsiveness of ovarian and breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010, 17: 147–157. 10.1677/ERC-09-0095View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Treeck O, Strunck E, Vollmer G: A novel basement membrane-induced gene identified in the human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line HEC1B. FEBS Lett 1998, 425: 426–430. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00278-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Treeck O, Schuler S, Haring J, Skrzypczak M, Lattrich C, Ortmann O: Icb1Gene counteracts growth of ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett 2013, 335: 441–446. 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lazennec G: Estrogen receptor beta, a possible tumor suppressor involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 2006, 231: 151–157. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.021PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman-Jungestrom M, Gentile M, Lundin AC, Wingren S: Association between CYP17 gene polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in young women. Int J Cancer 1999, 84: 350–353. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990820)84:4<350::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Erfani N, Razmkhah M, Talei AR, Pezeshki AM, Doroudchi M, Monabati A, Ghaderi A: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 promoter variants in breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2006, 165: 114–120. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.07.020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harendza S, Lovett DH, Panzer U, Lukacs Z, Kuhnl P, Stahl RA: Linked common polymorphisms in the gelatinase a promoter are associated with diminished transcriptional response to estrogen and genetic fitness. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 20490–20499. 10.1074/jbc.M211536200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stevens A, Soden J, Brenchley PE, Ralph S, Ray DW: Haplotype analysis of the polymorphic human vascular endothelial growth factor gene promoter. Cancer Res 2003, 63: 812–816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang Q, Nakamura M, Nakamura Y, Yoshimura G, Suzuma T, Umemura T, Tamaki T, Mori I, Sakurai T, Kakudo K: Correlation of prostate-specific antigen promoter polymorphisms with clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2002, 22: 1825–1828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Alvarez-Millan JJ, Bocos C, Ferrin V, Lucas AR, Ruibal A, Schneider J: PAI-1 promoter polymorphism modulates uPA-PAI complex accumulation by breast cancer cells. Oncology 2002, 62: 286–290. 10.1159/000059577View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillemette C, Millikan RC, Newman B, Housman DE: Genetic polymorphisms in uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and association with breast cancer among African Americans. Cancer Res 2000, 60: 950–956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuit SC, de Jong FH, Stolk L, Koek WN, van Meurs JB, Schoofs MW, Zillikens MC, Hofman A, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA, Uitterlinden AG: Estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms are associated with estradiol levels in postmenopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol 2005, 153: 327–334. 10.1530/eje.1.01973View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tempfer CB, Schneeberger C, Huber JC: Applications of polymorphisms and pharmacogenomics in obstetrics and gynecology. Pharmacogenomics 2004, 5: 57–65. 10.1517/phgs.5.1.57.25687View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gold B, Kalush F, Bergeron J, Scott K, Mitra N, Wilson K, Ellis N, Huang H, Chen M, Lippert R, Halldorsson BV, Woodworth B, White T, Clark AG, Parl FF, Broder S, Dean M, Offit K: Estrogen receptor genotypes and haplotypes associated with breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 2004, 64: 8891–8900. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1256View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitawaki J, Kado N, Ishihara H, Koshiba H, Kitaoka Y, Honjo H: Endometriosis: the pathophysiology as an estrogen-dependent disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2002, 83: 149–155. 10.1016/S0960-0760(02)00260-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cribb AE, Knight MJ, Dryer D, Guernsey J, Hender K, Tesch M, Saleh TM: Role of polymorphic human cytochrome P450 enzymes in estrone oxidation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15: 551–558. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0801View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cunat S, Hoffmann P, Pujol P: Estrogens and epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004, 94: 25–32. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar A, Ghosh B: A single nucleotide polymorphism (A – > G) in intron 3 of IFNgamma gene is associated with asthma. Genes Immun 2008, 9: 294–301. 10.1038/gene.2008.17View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jardin F, Ruminy P, Parmentier F, Picquenot JM, Courel MN, Bertrand P, Buchonnet G, Tilly H, Bastard C: Clinical and biological relevance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and acquired somatic mutations of the BCL6 first intron in follicular lymphoma. Leukemia 2005, 19: 1824–1830. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403915View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Crosbie PA, McGown G, Thorncroft MR, O’Donnell PN, Barber PV, Lewis SJ, Harrison KL, Agius RM, Santibanez-Koref MF, Margison GP, Povey AC: Association between lung cancer risk and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the first intron and codon 178 of the DNA repair gene, O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Int J Cancer 2008, 122: 791–795. 10.1002/ijc.23059View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Paca-Uccaralertkun S, Damgaard CK, Auewarakul P, Thitithanyanont A, Suphaphiphat P, Essex M, Kjems J, Lee TH: The Effect of a Single Nucleotide Substitution in the Splicing Silencer in the tat/rev Intron on HIV Type 1 Envelope Expression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2006, 22: 76–82. 10.1089/aid.2006.22.76View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Springwald A, Lattrich C, Seitz S, Ortmann O, Treeck O: Single nucleotide polymorphisms in human gene icb-1 and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Invest 2009, 27: 669–672. 10.1080/07357900802620877View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Schüler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement