Open Access

Ameliorative effects of rutin against metabolic, biochemical and hormonal disturbances in polycystic ovary syndrome in rats

  • Sarwat Jahan1,
  • Faryal Munir1,
  • Suhail Razak1, 2Email author,
  • Anam Mehboob1,
  • Qurat Ul Ain1,
  • Hizb Ullah1,
  • Tayyaba Afsar3,
  • Ghazala Shaheen1 and
  • Ali Almajwal2
Journal of Ovarian Research20169:86

DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0295-y

Received: 10 November 2016

Accepted: 29 November 2016

Published: 7 December 2016



Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. The study was commenced to assess the favorable effects of Rutin against metabolic, biochemical, histological, and androgenic aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome in rats.


Female Sprague-Dawley rats were administered letrozole (1 mg/kg) per orally (p.o) for a period of 21 days for the induction of PCOS, followed by dose of rutin (100 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg, p.o) for 15 days using 0.5% w/v CMC as vehicle. Metformin was also given as a standard control to one of the rat groups.

Serum estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, serum lipid parameters, CRP and glucose levels were evaluated. Furthermore, antioxidant activity was tested using superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione per-oxidase and reactive-oxygen species level.


Rutin flavonoid had a dose-dependent effect on androgenic levels depicting more recovery in the rutin-I treated group, while rutin-II treated groups showed better antioxidant and lipid profiles as compared with PCOS groups. A decrease in the value of C reactive protein (CRP) and a restoration in the proportion of estrous phase smears were observed in the rutin treated groups. Histopathological examination of ovary revealed a significant decrease in the number of cystic follicles in post treated groups. The effects observed with rutin were moderately similar to that with standard metformin, a widely used treatment drug for PCOS.


The study provides evidence for the potential ameliorative effects of rutin against clinical and biochemical features of PCOS.


Rutin Letrozole Polycystic ovary syndrome Oxidative stress


Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent endocrinopathy in women of reproductive age. PCOS are distinguished by hyperandrogenism showing symptoms of hirsutism, acne, androgenic alopecia; irregularities of menstrual cycle such as polymenorrhea, oestrogen-replete amenorrhoea, metrorrhagia and oligomenorrhea, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, chronic anovulation, hormonal imbalances and reduced fertility [14].

Various metabolic and clinical complications are associated with PCOS such as impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes, extensive coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic oligo-ovulation, anovulation, infertility, endometrial, ovarian and breast cancers [511].

PCOS patients usually have a high oxidative profile which causes disturbance in antioxidants balance, leading to harmful effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including infertility, endometriosis, abortion, birth defects, preeclampsia, injury to ovarian epithelium’s DNA, excessive apoptosis and alteration in cell signalling process [12, 13].

Letrozole, known as Femara, inhibits the cytochrome P450 enzyme, aromatase, by the catalytic action of which estrogen is synthesized by the androgens. The absence of aromatase enzyme causes disturbance in the steroidogenesis, thus causing increase in the production of androgens developing PCOS [14].

Metformin is commonly known as Glucophage and it belongs to the biguanide class of drugs. It has the chemical formula of C4H11N5 and molecular weight of 129.1636 g/mol. Metformin suppresses the process of gluconeogenesis and results in the decrease in blood sugar levels, reduce body weight and may improve the fibrinolysis activity, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake and utilization in peripheral tissues of skeletal muscle and adipocytes [15]. Metformin is also a best drug for PCOS treatment [16].

Flavonoids were chosen as a drug of choice for the cure of antiandrogenic, hyperlipidemic, hyperglycemic and oxidative stress consequences of PCOS. Flavonoids show a variety of biological actions including antimicrobial, antiviral, antiulcerogenic, cytotoxic, antineoplastic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antihypertensive, hepatoprotective, hypolipidemic and antiplatelet activities [17].

The natural rutin (3′,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone-3-rutinoside) is one of the important phytochemicals. Rutin is a bioflavonoid which is necessary for the absorption of vitamin C and acts as an anti-oxidizer [18]. Rutin has a noteworthy range of scavenging characteristics on oxidizing species such as hydroxy radical, superoxide radical, and peroxyl radical by donating hydrogen atoms to peroxy radicals, superoxide anions, and singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals, it also functions as a terminator and chelator of metal ions that are able of oxidizing lipid peroxidation [1921].

In this study, PCOS was induced by the use of aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, in the rodent model. Rutin was selected to be used as a therapy against polycystic ovary syndrome in the present study. Its comparative effects with metformin were assessed and it is anticipated to recover the complications caused due to PCOS.

The present study was designed to scrutinize whether rutin is effective in treating the endocrine, oxidative and reproductive dysfunctions in letrozole induced PCOS and to assess the prognostic power of this flavonoid in improving the clinical and biochemical features of PCOS.


Experimental animals

Six weeks old female Sprague-Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus), having weight of about 155 ± 10 g and exhibiting normal estrous cycle of 6 days were taken from Animal house of Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. Animals were supplied with pellets of feed and drinking water ad libitum and maintained in controlled experimental conditions in stainless steel cages. They were subjected to a 12:12 h light/dark cycles (relative humidity 60–65%) with room temperature of about 20 ± 5 °C for a period of 36 days. Animal handling, treatments and scarification was approved by the ethical committee of Department of Animal Sciences Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.

PCOS was induced by oral administration of aromatase inhibitor, letrozole (1 mg/kg) dissolved in 0.5% CMC (2 mg/kg) for 21 days. This dose was selected using the previous studies of Kafali et al. [22] and Rezvanfar et al. [23]. During the experiment, the estrous cycle phases were monitored by the analyses of relative proportion of leukocytes, epithelial and cornified cells. All rats were randomly divided into following five groups consisting of five rats in each group: (i) control group (CMC; 2 mg/kg/day, p.o.), (ii) PCOS group (letrozole; 01 mg/kg/day, p.o.), (iii) Metformin group (metformin; 2 mg/100 g/day, p.o.), (iv) Rutin-I group (rutin; 100 mg/kg/day, p.o.), and (v) Rutin-II group (rutin; 150 mg/kg/day, p.o.). Letrozole and CMC were administered for 36 days while metformin and the two rutin doses were administered from day 21 to the day 36 of the experiment.

Rats were sacrificed on 37th day, 24 h later the termination of the experiment. Blood was collected from the aorta of the rats under anesthesia in heparinized syringes and kept at -20 °C. It was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. Blood plasma was separated for biochemical and hormonal analysis and ovaries were taken out for histopathological and antioxidant assessments.

Assessment of experimentally induced PCOS

Anthropometrical parameters

Changes in body weight were recorded every week in control, PCOS, metformin and rutin treated groups throughout the experiment.

Weight gain, body length, body mass index (BMI), the abdominal circumference to thoracic circumference (AC/TC) ratio, Lee index and specific rate of body mass gain were determined during the day of dissection using standard measurement methods.

Ovarian weight, diameter and ovarian organ index were also evaluated using usual measurement procedures. From the first day of study until termination, every morning colypocytological examination was performed to check estrous cyclicity in rats.

Biochemical analysis

The concentration of blood glucose was evaluated on day 1, 21 and 36 of experiment using Accu Chek glucometer.

Antioxidant enzymes and protein levels were estimated in ovarian tissue of control and treated animals.

ROS value was determined using the protocol used by Hayashi et al. [24]. Catalase (CAT), Guaiacol peroxidase (POD) levels were analyzed as described in Chance and Maehly [25] with some modifications. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) was assessed by the protocol adopted by Kakkar et al. [26] and Thiobarbituric reactive acid substances (TBARS) levels were measured using Wright et al. [27] method. Gluthathione reductase (GSR); Carlberg & Mannervik [28], Glutathione-S-transferase (GST); Habig et al. [29], reduced Glutathione (GSH); Tietze et al. [30], Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-px); Mohandas et al. [31] and lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH) levels were measured using standard protocols used by (Jiang et al. [32]) on Smart Spec TM plus spectrophotometer.

Total cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), High-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), total protein and CRP were analyzed using commercially available kits of AMP diagnostics AMEDA Labordiagnostik GmbH, Austria. All the procedures were carried out using the manufacturer’s instructions.

Very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were calculated using Friedewald’s formula. Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) was calculated as the difference between TC and HDL-C while TC/HDL, TG/HDL and LDL/HDL were also assessed.

Hormonal analysis

Serum total testosterone, progesterone and estradiol were evaluated using commercially available ELISA kits of Microlisa AMGENIX Int, Inc. USA. All the procedures were carried out using manual instructions.

Histopathological analysis

The ovaries were processed for paraffin embedding, sectioned at 7 μm, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and observed under microscope at 100 × s magnification. All the ovarian follicles were examined depending upon their granulosa and morphology. The presence or absence of corpus luteum and thickness of peripheral theca and granulosa layer were also observed.

Statistical analysis

Data were represented as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM). Graph Pad PRISM 5 (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to describe the results statistically. Comparison of mean was done by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey test.


Effect of metformin and rutin on anthropometrical parameters

Administartion of letrozole to female rats for 36 days resulted in a significant increase in final body weights of PCOS group as compared to control (P < 0.05), however all the other anthropometrical parameters including weight gain, AC, TC, AC/TC ratio, BMI, Lee index and specific rate of body mass gain remained non-significant among rats in the various groups. Body length showed a significant increase in the PCOS group as compared to control group (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on anthropometrical parameters in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment







Weight gain (g)

25.20 ± 3.32

62.00 ± 10.61

46.20 ± 8.73

52.40 ± 5.16

36.01 ± 15.72


14.78 ± 0.42

15.82 ± 0.27

15.74 ± 0.29

15.2 ± 0.34

15.02 ± 0.29


13.86 ± 0.27

14.94 ± 0.18

14.78 ± 0.29

14.92 ± 0.18

14.36 ± 0.15

AC/TC ratio

1.06 ± 0.02

1.05 ± 0.01

1.06 ± 0.01

1.01 ± 0.01

1.04 ± 0.02

Body Length (cm)

19.24 ± 0.35

20.62 ± 0.36a*

20.42 ± 0.29

20.50 ± 0.27

20.12 ± 0.28

Body mass Index (g/cm2)

0.491 ± 0.016

0.545 ± 0.023

0.477 ± 0.018

0.522 ± 0.025

0.493 ± 0.029

Lee Index

0.294 ± 0.004

0.292 ± 0.006

0.288 ± 0.003

0.293 ± 0.005

0.287 ± 0.004

Specific Rate of Body mass gain (g/kg)

4.343 ± 0.945

27.760 ± 8.616

16.211 ± 5.041

26.660 ± 5.475

16.170 ± 9.213

AC/TC, abdominal circumference to thoracic circumference; PCOS, polycystic ovary sundrome

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

* p< 0.05

aValue vs control

Effect of metformin and rutin on colpocytological examination

Administration of letrozole to rats for 36 days caused disturbance of normal estrous cycle starting from day 17th till the end, in the PCOS group, resulting into a profuse vaginal secretion. Mainly diestrus stage remained dominant in it, exhibiting irregularity of the estrous cycle as compared to control group. In rats treated with metformin, rutin (100 mg/kg) and rutin (150 mg/kg), the normal estrous cycle depicted a restoration of regular phases when compared with control and PCOS groups.

Effect of metformin and rutin on weights of ovaries

There was no significant difference noted in weights, diameter and ovarian organ index among the different groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on weights, diameter and ovarian organ index of ovaries in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment

Groups (n=5)






Weight of left ovary (mg)

57.03 ± 3.23

66.67 ± 4.53

57.67 ± 5.08

66.33 ± 2.54

61.44 ± 4.23

Weight of right ovary (mg)

56.01 ± 2.44

65.25 ± 5.09

59.20 ± 4.01

64.03 ± 6.78

60.41 ± 3.72

Diameter of right ovary (mm)

4.80 ± 0.37

5.10 ± 0.24

4.60 ± 0.24

5.00 ± 0.31

4.80 ± 0.20

Diameter of left ovary (mm)

5.00 ± 0.44

5.60 ± 0.24

5.20 ± 0.20

5.50 ± 0.22

5.30 ± 0.20

Ovary organ index

0.31 ± 0.01

0.29 ± 0.02

0.28 ± 0.01

0.29 ± 0.01

0.31 ± 0.02

Values are expressed as Mean±SEM

Effect of metformin and rutin on glucose concentration

On the initial day of experiment blood glucose levels were measured. Mean ± SEM is given in Table 3. There was no major change in the mean values among the groups on the initiation of PCOS induction. On day 21, before the start of post treatment, glucose levels were again measured. PCOS and metformin group depicted significant increase (P < 0.001) when compared with control group, whereas, rutin–I and rutin–II groups illustrated significant increase (P < 0.05) as compared to control group. On the termination of experiment i.e., on day 36, highly significant increase (P < 0.001) in glucose concentration was noticed in PCOS group as compared to control group. On contrary to this, the metformin, rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and rutin-II (150 mg/kg) post treated groups showed highly significant decrease (P < 0.001) when compared with PCOS group.
Table 3

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on glucose levels measured on day 1, 21 and 36 of experiment in Letrozole induced PCOS rats

Glucose levels (mg/dL)






Day 1

74.21 ± 1.93

73.23 ± 2.81

73.40 ± 3.29

73.01 ± 2.98

72.61 ± 2.42

Day 21

79.22 ± 3.21

95.61 ± 3.18a**

95.83 ± 1.93a**

93.21 ± 3.30a*

92.80 ± 2.72a*

Day 36

79.20 ± 3.11

96.44 ± 2.00a***

77.21 ± 1.90b***

79.80 ± 1.01b***

76.40 ± 1.60b***

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

*=p< 0.05, **=p< 0.01, ***=p< 0.001

aValue vs control, bValue vs PCOS

Effect of metformin and rutin on total protein and C reactive protein

In PCOS group, the total protein values increased significantly as compared with the control group (P < 0.05) while they were significantly reduced in the rutin-II group (P < 0.05) when compared with PCOS group.

The values of C-reactive protein (CRP) increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the PCOS group when compared with the control group. None of the other groups i.e., metformin, rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and rutin-II (150 mg/kg) exhibited any significant change in the CRP values when compared with control, PCOS and among themselves (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on total protein and CRP concentration in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment

Protein values






Total Protein (mg/g of tissue)

25.371 ± 1.852

40.242 ± 1.771a*

25.491 ± 2.423b*

26.701 ± 6.264

25.342 ± 2.944b*

CRP (mg/dL)

0.051 ± 0.004

0.069 ± 0.001a*

0.060 ± 0.006

0.062 ± 0.002

0.059 ± 0.004

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

*p< 0.05

aValue vs control

bValue vs PCOs

Effect of metformin and rutin on ROS

The value of ROS in PCOS group increased significantly as compared to that of control group (P < 0.05) but the change was not significant when taken into comparison with metformin and rutin groups. The values of metformin, rutin-I and rutin-II groups varied significantly as compared with that of the PCOS group (P < 0.05). But there was non-significant change in metformin, rutin-I and rutin-II groups as compared with that of the control group and also among each other (Table 5).
Table 5

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on ROS, TBARS, LOOH, CAT, POD, SOD, GSR, GST, GSH, GSH-px concentrations in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment







ROS (U/min)

0.20 ± 0.04

0.39 ± 0.09a*

0.17 ± 0.02b*

0.19 ± 0.02b*

0.16 ± 0.01b*

TBARS (nmol/min/mg)

5.69 ± 1.07

16.06 ± 1.25a**

10.78 ± 1.07

8.93 ± 2.45b*

8.15 ± 0.82b*

LOOH (nmol/min/mg)

3.29 ± 0.48

5.39 ± 0.29a*

3.44 ± 0.47

3.59 ± 0.63

3.23 ± 0.42b*


4.93 ± 0.08

3.49 ± 0.33a*

4.15 ± 0.47

4.22 ± 0.28

4.49 ± 0.38


12.09 ± 0.72

9.29 ± 0.01a*

10.44 ± 0.62

10.11 ± 0.58

11.87 ± 0.59b*

SOD (U/min)

5.81 ± 0.24

2.74 ± 0.29a*

5.51 ± 0.51b*

5.41 ± 1.08b*

5.72 ± 0.51b*

GSR (U/mol/mg)

3.96 ± 0.38

1.79 ± 0.09a*

3.89 ± 0.29b*

3.46 ± 0.71

4.67 ± 0.52b*

GST (U/mol/mg)

10.85 ± 0.21

8.02 ± 0.83a**

9.47 ± 0.28

9.37 ± 0.48

10.91 ± 0.22b*

GSH (U/mol/mg)

6.91 ± 0.50

4.97 ± 0.14a**

6.55 ± 0.48b*

6.39 ± 0.02b*

6.77 ± 0.88b**

GSH-px (U/mol/mg)

29.87 ± 2.14

20.35 ± 0.64a**

25.34 ± 2.11

24.24 ± 1.76

30.10 ± 1.29b**

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

*=p< 0.05, **=p< 0.01

aValue vs control, bValue vs PCOS

Effect of metformin and rutin on antioxidant profile

The results regarding the protective effects of rutin against PCOS in rat ovaries and activities of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD, SOD, TBARS, LOOH, GSH-Px, GSR, GSH and GST are shown in Table 5. Activities of antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD, SOD, GSR, GST, GSH and GSH-Px were significantly reduced in PCOS group as compared to control group. This reduction in enzymes activity was reversed non significantly by the treatment of metformin while significant increase was seen in the values of SOD, GSR and GSH (P < 0.05). Rutin (100 mg/kg) did not show any significant difference (P < 0.05) among various groups except the significant increase in the SOD and GSH value as compared to the PCOS group. Alteration in the ovarian enzyme activities with the treatment of Rutin (150 mg/kg) showed statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) as compared to PCOS group.

Letrozole increased the TBARS (P < 0.01) and LOOH (P < 0.05) levels significantly in PCOS as compared to control. Metformin did not show any significance while rutin (100 mg/kg), rutin (150 mg/kg) treatment exhibited significant decrease (P < 0.05) in both antioxidants.

Effect of metformin and rutin on serum testosterone, progesterone and estradiol values

Administration of letrozole to female rats for 36 days resulted in a highly significant increase in the serum testosterone as compared with the control (P < 0.001) while the metformin, rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and rutin-II (150 mg/kg) exhibited a moderately significant decrease (P < 0.01) in comparison with the PCOS group but remained non-significant when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the values of estradiol among rats of all the groups. Letrozole administration resulted in a very significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the progesterone value in the PCOS group when compared with the control group (Table 6).
Table 6

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on serum testosterone, estradioland progesterone concentrations in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment

Hormonal concentrations






Testosterone (ng/ml)

1.88 ± 0.71

10.19 ± 0.76a***

4.51 ± 0.30 b**

5.77 ± 0.68b*

8.21 ± 1.85a**

Estradiol (ng/ml)

19.41 ± 2.21

14.26 ± 2.70

28.57 ± 4.32

34.83 ± 8.26

27.25 ± 0.48

Progesterone (pg/ml)

43.43 ± 8.81

12.76 ± 3.75a**

22.98 ± 4.85

19.66 ± 5.34a*

24.63 ± 3.46

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

*=p< 0.05, **=p< 0.01, ***=p< 0.001

aValue vs control, bValue vs PCOS

Effect of metformin and rutin on lipid profile

Administration of letrozole (1 mg/kg) to female rats for 36 days resulted in a significant increase in serum TG, VLDL-C, LDL-C and non-HDL-C, whereas HDL-C was significantly decreased when compared with vehicle control (P < 0.05). Metformin significantly reduced TC (P < 0.05), LDL-C and non-HDL-C (P < 0.01). Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) treatment caused significant reduction in TC and non-HDL (P < 0.05). While rutin-II (150 mg/kg) significantly lowered TC, TG, VLDL-C, LDL-C and non-HDL-C but did not affect the level of HDL-C (Table 7).
Table 7

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL- C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, Non-HDL-C, TC/HDL, TG/HDL and LDL/HDL concentrations in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment







Total Cholesterol(mg/dL)

215.60 ± 3.43

231.10 ± 4.27

211.30 ± 6.81b*

212.21 ± 1.53b*

207.10 ± 2.24b**

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

185.11 ± 4.23

213.10 ± 5.16a*

197.40 ± 5.82

199.20 ± 6.93

186.12 ± 4.62b*

HDL-C (mg/dL)

160.70 ± 4.17

144.41 ± 3.63a*

153.21 ± 1.80

146.43 ± 4.52

159.80 ± 3.14b*

LDL-C (mg/dL)

17.83 ± 3.98

42.99 ± 1.99a**

18.58 ± 7.22b**

25.81 ± 5.11

10.05 ± 2.29b***

VLDL-C (mg/dL)

37.03 ± 0.85

42.61 ± 1.03a*

39.49 ± 1.16

39.83 ± 1.39

37.20 ± 0.92b*


54.86 ± 4.48

85.61 ± 1.50a**

58.07 ± 7.32b**

65.65 ± 4.75b*

47.24 ± 2.64b***


1.34 ± 0.03

1.59 ± 0.02a***

1.38 ± 0.05b**

1.45 ± 0.04

1.29 ± 0.02b***c*


1.16 ± 0.04

1.48 ± 0.06a**

1.29 ± 0.03

1.37 ± 0.06

1.17 ± 0.04b**


0.11 ± 0.03

0.29 ± 0.01a**

0.12 ± 0.05b**

0.18 ± 0.04

0.06 ± 0.02b***

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001

a Value vs control, b Value vs PCOS, c Value vs Metformin

Effect of metformin and rutin on histopathology of ovary

The histological changes studied were as follows: (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Histopathological features of ovary in Letrozole induced PCOS in rats. Representative photographs of section of ovary showing various developing follicles, cystic follicle (c.f), atretic follicle (a.f) and corpus luteum (c.l): (a) Control group (b) PCOS group (c) Metformin group (d) Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and (e) Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) (40× magnification)

The diameter of developing follicles

The diameter of developing follicles (D20 μm –D > 600 μm) did not depict any significant difference among the various groups.

Number of cystic and atretic follicles

The number of cystic and atretic follicles were increased significantly (P < 0.001) in the PCOS group as compared with the control group. Metformin, rutin (100 mg/kg) and rutin (150 mg/kg) significantly reduced the number of cystic follicles (P < 0.001) and atretic follicles (P < 0.05) as compared to PCOS group (Table 8).
Table 8

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on number of cystic follicles, atretic follicles and corpus luteum in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment

Number of follicles






Cystic follicles

0.0 ± 0.0

10.17 ± 0.70a***

5.16 ± 0.30a***b***

6.16 ± 0.47 a***b***

7.33 ± 0.42a***b**c*


2.00 ± 0.25

4.50 ± 0.34a***

2.83 ± 0.47b*

2.66 ± 0.33b*

2.83 ± 0.40b*


6.80 ± 0.37

2.40 ± 0.24a***

4.20 ± 0.58a**b*

2.40 ± 0.50a*** c*

4.40 ± 0.24a**b*d*

Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

*p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001

aValue vs control, bValue vs PCOS, cValue vs Metformin, dValue vsRutin-I

Number of corpus luteum

The number of corpus luteum was significantly decreased in the PCOS group as compared to control (P < 0.001) whereas significant recovery was shown in the metformin, rutin-I and rutin-II groups (P < 0.05) (Table 8).

Thickness of peripheral thecal and granulosa layer in normal and cystic follicles

The thickness of peripheral thecal layer (D200 μm -D > 600 μm) remained non-significant in the normal follicles among the various groups but its thickness increased significantly (P < 0.001) in the PCOS group when compared with control group. The thickness was restored significantly (P < 0.001) in metformin and rutin post treated groups when compared with PCOS group.

PCOS group showed highly significant (P < 0.001) reduction in peripheral granulosa thickness in follicles when compared with control group whereas in cystic follicles width of granulose layer increased non-significantly in metformin, rutin-I and rutin-II group as compare to PCOS group (Table 9).
Table 9

Effect of Rutin-I (100 mg/kg) and Rutin-II (150 mg/kg) on thickness of thecal layer and peripheral granulosa layer in Letrozole induced PCOS rats after 36 days of experiment

Thickness (μm) Rutin I

Control Rutin II



Thecal Layer






Granulosa Layer






Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM

***=p< 0.001

aValue vs PCOS


Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, was used to induce PCOS in the rats. Subsequently the increased weights of rats and irregular estrous cycle in the positive control substantiated the induction of PCOS and also signified that the rat model is anoestrous, as it imitated anovulatory characteristic [33]. Treatment of PCOS induced rats with flavonoid rutin possibly restored the estrous cyclicity in rats. The rutin treated groups, however, did not depict any significant increase in body weight which suggested that rutin might have reduced the expression levels of adipogenic genes thus reducing the weight of adipose tissues [34].

Surprisingly, the ovarian weights, ovarian diameter and ovarian organ index displayed no significant increase. The non-significant anthropometrical results might be due to the fast metabolic response of the animals, suggesting that other genetic or environmental factors or longer time of exposure to aromatase inhibitor was necessary to achieve the full spectrum of ovarian pathology.

The glucose levels increased significantly when measured in the PCOS group during the day 21 and 36 of the experiment. Letrozole seems to create a disturbance in the hormonal profile of the animals mainly because of increased androgen levels. This increased androgen levels in turn induced insulin resistance hence creating a decreased glucose tolerance [35]. Meanwhile, metformin reduced the glucose levels significantly as compared to PCOS group. This may be due to the fact that metformin treatment decreased the glucose resistance by maintaining the glucose homeostasis and also by improving the insulin-mediated uptake of glucose [35, 36]. Rutin flavonoid significantly reduces the glucose values in the treated groups as compared with PCOS group because of its antihyperglycemic effect and caused a decrease in the glycaemic levels by conceivably playing its role as potentiating the insulin secretion by the β-cells of Islets of Langerhans thus promoting a balanced uptake of glucose by the cells [37]. It also suggested that rutin might be a potential agent for glycaemic control through enhancement of insulin-dependent receptor kinase activity, thus inducing the insulin signalling pathway, and consequently causing increased glucose transporter 4 translocation and increased glucose uptake [38].

The total protein index increased significantly in the PCOS group. This abnormal level of total protein might suggest infectious and chronic inflammation in the PCOS group which might be due to the abnormal androgen secretions. However, metformin significantly lowered the amount of total protein as compared with the positive vehicle group. The improved sensitivity of proteins and protein hormones after the metformin therapy down regulate the increased circulating levels of protein in the blood [39]. Rutin flavonoid significantly decreased the total protein level by inhibiting the eicosanoids and cytokines due to its pharmacologic actions [40]. The C- reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase protein and a very expedient indicator of inflammation in a tissue. In present study, the CRP levels increased significantly in the PCOS group thus exhibiting severe infection [41].

Elevated testosterone levels in PCOS most probably reflect build-up of androgens because conversion of androgen substrates into estrogens was blocked by aromatase inhibitor. The decrease in testosterone concentration in metformin group reflect diminished androgen biosynthesis by the ovary [42]. The diminution of estrogen production by aromatase inhibition can cause enhanced secretion of LH in hypothalamus and pituitary most likely by negative feedback of estrogens.

Oxidative stress is generally regarded as the phenomena where the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) cause disruption in the normal functionality of biological system. The aerobic cells have a counter mechanism to deal with oxidative stress by trapping the reactive oxygen intermediates but the inequity in terms of the rate of the production of ROS and their protective systems can cause oxidative stress over time. In present study, the ROS level increased significantly in the PCOS group which depicted an increase in the oxidative stress [43]. The increase in ROS level indicates the molecular damage in the cellular structure and the tissue was mainly due to the over production of free oxidative radicals. ROS value was also decreased significantly in the rutin groups, which is due to the antioxidant activity of rutin. The exact mechanism through which rutin induces antioxidative action is not clear but it reduces the causative agents of oxidative stress [44].

Lipid peroxidation is a free-radical mediated promulgation of oxidative offence inserted to polyunsaturated fatty acids involving numerous types of free radicals. The cessation of lipid peroxidation occurs by antioxidants through their enzymatic action or by free radical scavenging activity [45]. The increase in the lipid per hydroxide levels might be due to the termination of antioxidant effect which caused pathogenesis of the disease.

Histopathological observation of ovaries taken from Letrozole treated animals displayed remarkable resemblance to human PCOS, revealing sub capsular cysts lined with a thin layer of granulosa cells and hyperplasia of theca cells [12]. It has been observed that the increased levels of intra-ovarian androgens lead to abnormal follicular growth and an increase in follicular artesia [46, 47]. Number of corpus luteum and different developing follicles measuring in diameter from 20 μm to more than 600 μm also decreased non-significantly in PCOS group. Cystic follicles were much larger in size as compared to other follicles of ovary with a clear antrum but lacked oocyte. Thickness of peripheral granulosa layer was decreased while that of theca layer was increased significantly in different follicles of PCOS group, as compared to control group. Contrary to this, post treated groups exhibited non-significant increase when compared with PCOS group. These histological findings were pinpointing towards the existence of biologically active levels of FSH, increased LH, and lack of interplay between granulosa and theca cells, which would otherwise lead to ovulation, in the PCOS group.


Concluding our work, present study demonstrates antiandrogenic properties of rutin. It showed estrogenic, antiandrogenic and anti hyperglycemic effects and recovered ovarian cysts and its protective properties was seen to be comparable to that of metformin. The restoration of ovarian function and hormonal profile by rutin treatment could be supportive in managing PCOS. Outcomes of the study also revealed that letrozole induced PCOS had an enhanced level of oxidative stress along with hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia. Oxidative stress in turn damaged the tissue by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the rutin flavonoid was able to antidote the oxidative stress. Meanwhile, rutin also played an imperative role in reducing the oxidative stress, boosting the antioxidant status, and possibly reducing the ROS and lipid peroxidation. It displayed a significant role in subsiding the hyperlipidemic state and hyperglycemic state and it can be used as a possible ameliorative medication for curing clinical and biochemical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome, its properties were analogous to that of standard metformin. Further research is prerequisite to investigate the pharmacologic and therapeutic potentials of rutin so that it can be used as an adjunct therapy sideways to currently used drugs in PCOS management.



We acknowledge Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for funding.

Furthermore we are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding of this research through Research Group Project number 193.


The project was partially funded by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan. We are grateful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding of this research through Research Group Project number 193.

Availability of data and materials

All the data is contained in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

SJ, FM and HZ made significant contributions to conception, design, experimentation, acquisition and interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. SR, TA, AA has made substantial contributions to analyzing, and revising the manuscript for intellectual content. SR, GA, AM and QA made a contribution into revising and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study makes use of rats and the experimental protocol for the use of animal was approved (BAS#0256) by the ethical board of Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad Pakistan.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Reproductive Physiology Laboratory, Department Of Animal Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University
Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University
Department of Biochemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University


  1. Lobo RA, Carmina E. The importance of diagnosing the polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(12):989–93.Google Scholar
  2. Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(4):219–31.Google Scholar
  3. Pasquali R, Stener‐Victorin E, Yildiz BO, Duleba AJ, Hoeger K, Mason H, Homburg R, Hickey T, Franks S, Tapanainen JS. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;74(4):424–33.Google Scholar
  4. Zawadzki J, Dunaif A. PCOS Forum: research in polycystic ovary syndrome today and tomorrow. PCOS. 1992;4:377–84.Google Scholar
  5. Sharma A, Atiomo W. Recent developments in polycystic ovary syndrome. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;13(5):281–6.Google Scholar
  6. Rossing MA, Daling JR, Weiss NS, Moore DE, Self SG. Ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women. New Engl J Med. 1994;331(12):771–6.Google Scholar
  7. Cheung AP. Ultrasound and menstrual history in predicting endometrial hyperplasia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):325–31.Google Scholar
  8. Cho LW, Jayagopal V, Kilpatrick ES, Atkin SL. The biological variation of C-reactive protein in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Clin Chem. 2005;51(10):1905a–7.Google Scholar
  9. Broekmans F, Knauff E, Valkenburg O, Laven J, Eijkemans M, Fauser B. PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO‐II anovulation and association with metabolic factors. BJOG. 2006;113(10):1210–7.Google Scholar
  10. Barry JA, Azizia MM, Hardiman PJ. Risk of endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):748–58.Google Scholar
  11. Ladrón DGA, Fux-Otta C, Crisosto N, Szafryk DMP, Echiburu B, Iraci G, Perez-Bravo F, Petermann T. Metabolic profile of the different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome in two Latin American populations. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1732–9. e1731-1732.Google Scholar
  12. Riley JC, Behrman HR. Oxygen radicals and reactive oxygen species in reproduction. Exp Biol Med. 1991;198(3):781–91.Google Scholar
  13. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK. Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3(1):1.Google Scholar
  14. Corbin C, Trant J, Walters K, Conley AJ. Changes in Testosterone Metabolism Associated with the Evolution of Placental and Gonadal Isozymes of Porcine Aromatase Cytochrome P450 1. Endocrinology. 1999;140(11):5202–10.Google Scholar
  15. Del Barco S, Vazquez-Martin A, Cufí S, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Bosch-Barrera J, Joven J, Martin-Castillo B, Menendez JA. Metformin: multi-faceted protection against cancer. Oncotarget. 2011;2(12):896–917.Google Scholar
  16. Nawrocka J, Starczewski A. Effects of metformin treatment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome depends on insulin resistance. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23(4):231–7.Google Scholar
  17. Formica J, Regelson W. Review of the biology of quercetin and related bioflavonoids. Food Chem Toxicol. 1995;33(12):1061–80.Google Scholar
  18. Buszewski B, Kawka S, Suprynowicz Z, Wolski T, Pharm J. Simultaneous isolation of rutin and esculin from plant material and drugs using solid-phase extraction. Biomed Anal. 1993;11(3):211–5.Google Scholar
  19. Henry F, Danoux L, Pauly G, Charrouf Z. A plant extract and its pharmaceutical and cosmetic use. Patent Applied WO. 2005; 39610.Google Scholar
  20. Middleton E, Kandaswami C, Theoharides TC. The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease, and cancer. Pharmacol Rev. 2000;52(4):673–751.Google Scholar
  21. Wang Q, Ogura T, Wang L. Research and development of new products from bitter-buckwheat. Curr AdvBuckwheat Res. 1995;1:873–9.Google Scholar
  22. Kafali H, Iriadam M, Ozardalı I, Demir N. Letrozole-induced polycystic ovaries in the rat: a new model for cystic ovarian disease. Arch Med Res. 2004;35(2):103-108.Google Scholar
  23. Rezvanfar MA, Ahmadi A, Shojaei-Saadi HA, Baeeri M, Abdollahi M. Molecular mechanisms of a novel selenium-based complementary medicine which confers protection against hyperandrogenism-induced polycystic ovary. Theriogenology. 2012;78(3):620-631.Google Scholar
  24. Hayashi I, Morishita Y, Imai K, Nakamura M, Nakachi K, Hayashi T. High-throughput spectrophotometric assay of reactive oxygen species in serum. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2007;631(1):55–61.Google Scholar
  25. Chance B, Maehly AC. [136] Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymol. 1955;2:764–775.Google Scholar
  26. Kakkar P, Das B, Viswanathan PN. A modified spectrophotometric assay of superoxide. dismutase. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1984;21(2):130–2.Google Scholar
  27. Wright D, Sutherland L. Antioxidant supplemention in the treatment of skeletal muscle insulin resistance: potential mechanisms and clinical relevance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33(1):21–31.Google Scholar
  28. Carlberg I.N.C.E.R. Mannervik B.E.N.G.T. Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(14):5475–5480.Google Scholar
  29. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974;249(22):7130–7139.Google Scholar
  30. Tietze F. Enzymic method for quantitative determination of nanogram amounts of total and oxidized glutathione: applications to mammalian blood and other tissues. Anal Biochem. 1969;27(3):502–522.Google Scholar
  31. Mohandas J, Marshall JJ, Duggin GG, Horvath JS, Tiller DJ. Differential distribution of glutathione and glutathione-related enzymes in rabbit kidney: possible implications in analgesic nephropathy. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;33(11):1801–1807.Google Scholar
  32. Jiang Z-Y, Woollard AC, Wolff SP. Lipid hydroperoxide measurement by oxidation of Fe2+ in the presence of xylenol orange. Comparison with the TBA assay and an iodometric method. Lipids. 1991;26(10):853-856.Google Scholar
  33. Manneras L, Cajander S, Holmang A, Seleskovic Z, Lystig T, Lönn M, Stener-Victorin E. A new rat model exhibiting both ovarian and metabolic characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology. 2007;148(8):3781–91.Google Scholar
  34. Kim S, Seo S, Lee M-S, Jang E, Shin Y, Oh S, Kim Y. Rutin Reduces Body Weight with an Increase of Muscle Mitochondria Biogenesis and Activation of AMPK in Diet-induced Obese Rats. FASEB J. 2015;29((1 Supplement):595. 594.Google Scholar
  35. Desai NR, Shrank WH, Fischer MA, Avorn J, Liberman JN, Schneeweiss S, Pakes J, Brennan TA, Choudhry NK. Patterns of medication initiation in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus: quality and cost implications. Am J Med. 2012;125(3):302. e301–7.Google Scholar
  36. Pai SA, Majumdar AS. J Pharm Pharmacol. Protective effects of melatonin against metabolic and reproductive disturbances in polycystic ovary syndrome in rats. 2014;66(12):1710–21.Google Scholar
  37. Kamalakkannan N, Stanely Mainzen Prince P. Antihyperlipidaemic effect of Aegle marmelos fruit extract in streptozotocin‐induced diabetes in rats. J Sci Food Agric. 2005;85(4):569–73.Google Scholar
  38. Hsu CY, Shih HY, Chia YC, Lee CH, Ashida H, Lai YK, Weng CF. Rutin potentiates insulin receptor kinase to enhance insulin‐dependent glucose transporter 4 translocation. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58(6):1168–76.Google Scholar
  39. Oktenli C, Ozgurtas T, Dede M, Sanisoglu YS, Yenen MC, Yesilova Z, Kenar L, Kurt YG, Baser I, Smith J. Metformin decreases circulating acylation-stimulating protein levels in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23(12):710–5.Google Scholar
  40. Umar S, Mishra NK, Pal K, Sajad M, Ansari MM, Ahmad S, Katiyar CK, Khan HA. Protective effect of rutin in attenuation of collagen-induced arthritis in Wistar rat by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress. Indian J Rheumatol. 2012;7(4):191–8.Google Scholar
  41. Boulman N, Levy Y, Leiba R, Shachar S, Linn R, Zinder O, Blumenfeld Z. Increased C-reactive protein levels in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a marker of cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2004;89(5):2160–5.Google Scholar
  42. Attia GR, Rainey WE, Carr BR. Metformin directly inhibits androgen production in human thecal cells. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):517–24.Google Scholar
  43. Fenkci V, Fenkci S, Yilmazer M, Serteser M. Decreased total antioxidant status and increased oxidative stress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome may contribute to the risk of cardiovascular disease. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):123–7.Google Scholar
  44. Yang J, Guo J, Yuan J. In vitro antioxidant properties of rutin. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2008;41(6):1060–6.Google Scholar
  45. Korkina LG, Afanas’ Ev IB. Advances in pharmacology. 1996;38:151–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. V Mahesh, T Mills, C Bagnell, B Conway. Animal models for study of polycystic ovaries and ovarian atresia. In: Regulation of Ovarian and Testicular Function. edn.: Springer; 1987: 237-257.Google Scholar
  47. Homburg R. Androgen circle of polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Reproduction. 2009. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep049.


© The Author(s). 2016