Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of sensitivity analysis findings

From: Evaluating influence of the genotypes in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn (rs6166) polymorphism on poor and hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis

Original summary effects

  

Resulting pooled OR

 

OR

95% CI

Nature of association

Omitted study [ref]

OR

95% CI

Effect of study omission

NN genotype poor response overall

0.95

0.66-1.37

no associations

Livshyts C [39]

1.05

0.75-1.48

slight likelihood of N carriers being poor responders

0.95

0.66-1.37

no associations

Yan [41]

1.03

0.70-1.50

slight likelihood of N carriers being poor responders

SS genotype poor response NHC

1.24

0.76-2.05

S carriers likely to be poor responders

Livshyts C [39]

0.98

0.71-1.36

no associations

NN genotype poor response NHC

0.99

0.60-1.62

no associations

Livshyts C [39]

1.23

0.93-1.64

likelihood of N carriers being poor responders

0.99

0.60-1.62

no associations

Livshyts G [39]

1.12

0.69-1.82

likelihood of N carriers being poor responders

NS genotype hyper-response NHC

1.03

0.76-1.40

no associations

Daelemans [36]

0.90

0.60-1.34

slight likelihood of NS carriers being non-hyper-responders

  1. OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; Note: In Livshyts 2009, the suffixes C and G indicate control women less than 35 years old and over 35 years old, respectively.