Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The prognostic significance of anti-angiogenesis therapy in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

First author

Agents

Journal

Phase

Year

Treatment setting

No. of patients

Median follow-up time (months)

FIGO stage

Hazard ratio (95 % CI)

Control group

Anti-angiogenic group

Control group

Anti-angiogenic group

PFS

OS

Pujade-Lauraine E [8]

Bevacizumab

JCO

III

2014

Recurrent

182

179

13.9

13

0.48 (0.38–0.60)

0.85 (0.66–1.08)

Aghajanian C [9]

Bevacizumab

JCO

III

2012

Recurrent

242

242

24

24

0.48 (0.39–0.61)

1.03 (0.79–1.33)

Perren TJ [10]

Bevacizumab

NEJM

III

2011

Primary

764

764

19.4

19.4

I-IV

0.87 (0.77–0.99)

0.85 (0.69–1.04)

Burger RA [11]

Bevacizumab

NEJM

III

2011

Primary

625

623

17.4

17.4

III-IV

0.64 (0.55–0.76)

0.92 (0.73–1.15)

Monk BJ [12]

Trebananib

Lancet Oncology

III

2014

Recurrent

458

461

10.1

10.1

0.66 (0.57–0.77)

0.86 (0.69–1.08)

Karlan BY [13]a

Trebananib

JCO

II

2012

Recurrent

55

53

14.9

15.4

I-IV

0.81 (0.51–1.30)

0.60 (0.34–1.06)

Karlan BY [13]b

Trebananib

JCO

II

2012

Recurrent

55

53

14.9

15.2

I-IV

0.75 (0.49–1.21)

0.77 (0.45–1.31)

du Bois A [14]

Pazopanib

JCO

III

2014

Primary

468

472

24

24

II-IV

0.77 (0.64–0.91)

1.08 (0.87–1.33)

Liu JF [15]

Cediranib

Lancet Oncology

II

2014

Recurrent

46

44

16.6

16.6

0.42 (0.23–0.76)

Ledermann JA [16]

Cediranib

2013 ESMO meeting

III

2013

Recurrent

0.57 (0.45–0.74)

0.70 (0.51–0.99)

Ledermann JA [17]

Nintedanib

JCO

II

2011

Recurrent

40

43

I-IV

0.65 (0.41–1.02)

0.84 (0.51–1.39)

du Bois A [18]

Nintedanib

2013 ESGO meeting

III

2013

Primary

455

911

IIB-IV

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

Gotlieb WH [19]

Aflibercept

Lancet Oncology

II

2012

Recurrent

26

29

1.01 (0.56–1.86)

  1. aTrebananib:10mg/kg; b Trebananib:3mg/kg