Skip to main content

Table 1 The main characteristics of included studies in this meta-analysis

From: The association between CDH1 promoter methylation and patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic meta-analysis

First author

Region

Country

Race

Method

Sample

Control

Case

Control

Stage 1-2

Stage 3-4

Serous

Non-serous

M/N

M/N

M/N

M/N

M/N

M/N

Rathi 2002 [35]

Promoter

USA

Caucasians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

14/49

2/39

-

-

-

-

Makarla 2005 [21]

Promoter

USA

Caucasians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

6/23

4/39

-

-

2/9

3/13

Makarla 2005 [21]

Promoter

USA

Caucasians

MSP

Tissue

LMP

6/23

4/23

-

-

-

-

Yuecheng 2006 [26]

Promoter

China

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

34/80

0/34

-

-

-

-

Shen 2007 [23]

Promoter

China

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

18/63

1/30

2/22

16/41

9/34

9/29

Montavon 2012 [34]

Promoter

Australia

Caucasians

MSHSP

Tissue

NMT

17/78

1/5

-

-

-

-

Bhagat 2013 [20]

Promoter

India

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NM

31/86

2/34

8/23

23/63

17/44

7/25

Bhagat 2013 [20]

Promoter

India

Asians

MSP

Tissue

LMP

31/86

2/14

-

-

-

-

Wu 2014 [25]

Promoter

China

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

32/50

-

7/12

25/38

25/35

7/15

Moselhy 2015 [22]

Promoter

Saudi Arabia

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

12/18

8/32

-

-

-

-

Sun and Zhang 2015 [24]

Promoter

China

Asians

MSP

Tissue

NMT

15/38

1/42

-

-

-

-

  1. MSP Methylation Specific PCR, MSHSP Methylation specific headloop suppression PCR, NMT nonmalignant tissues, LMP low malignant potential tumor, “-” indicates data not available, M stands for the number of methylation positive, N stands for the number of the total samples