Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity analysis

From: Can polymorphisms of AMH/AMHR2 affect ovarian stimulation outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Polymorphism

Comparison

All studies

MD (95%CI)

I2

Sensitivity analysis

Results

No. Studies/

participant

No. Studies/

participant

MD 95%CI

I2

No. of oocytes retrieved

AMH (rs10407022)

TT versus GG/GT

6/1739

−0.19 (−1.29, 0.91)

81%

a 5/1580

−0.82 (− 1.55, − 0.08)

52%

Became significant

TT versus GG

3/792

0.25 (−2.70, 3.21)

93%

a 2/687

−1.44 (−2.05, −0.83)

0%

Became significant

TT versus GT

3/1199

−0.27 (−1.66, 1.12)

88%

a 2/1052

−1.03 (− 1.87, − 0.19)

70%

Became significant

GG versus TT/GT

3/1335

−0.42 (− 0.2.69, 1.85)

90%

a 2/1176

0.71 (0.06, 1.53)

0%

Became significant

AMHR (rs2002555)

AA versus GG/AG

5/1614

0.01 (−0.81,0.83)

66%

b 4/979

0.44 (−0.15, 1.02)

0%

Not affected

AA versus GG

3/969

0.32 (−1.34, 1.99)

73%

b 2/509

−0.53 (− 1.85, 0.79)

0%

Not affected

AA versus AG

4/1587

−0.41 (−1.31, 0.48)

67%

c 3/1056

−0.92 (−1.42, − 0.42)

0%

Became significant

GG versus AA/AG

3/1342

−0.36 (−2.24, 1.53)

80%

b 2/707

0.58 (−0.70, 1.87)

0%

Not affected

Gn dosage

AMHR (rs2002555)

AA versus GG/AG

4/1230

−13.25 (−58.41, 32.47)

63%

c 3/682

−53.36 (−146.58, 39.86)

44%

Not affected

Stimulation duration

AMHR (rs2002555)

AA versus GG/AG

3/907

2.81 (−4.51, 10.13)

75%

b 2/270

−0.27 (−0.86, 0.31)

66%

Not affected

  1. a Sensitivity analysis excluding Peluso study
  2. b Sensitivity analysis excluding Wu study
  3. cSensitivity analysis excluding Cerra study
  4. AMH anti-Müllerian hormone, AMHR AMH receptor, Gn dosage gonadotropin consumption, MD weighted mean difference, No. number