Table 4 R0 resection prediction comparison between the kNN model and logistic regression on a random sub cohort of 20 patients from the training set. All these patients underwent primary or interval debulking surgery and complete cytoreduction was achieved
From: Predicting complete cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer patients using nearest-neighbor models
Patient | Age | BMI | Charlson Comorbidity Index | Type of surgery | Surgical Compexity Score categories | Pre Tx Ca125 | Disease score | kNN model | Logistic regression |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 52 | 26.4 | 5 | Interval | Standard | 10,156 | 1 | R0 | R0 |
2 | 66 | 28.1 | 5 | Interval | Standard | 466 | 1 | R0 | R0 |
3 | 77 | 18.8 | 4 | Interval | Standard | 1876 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
4 | 58 | 28.7 | 4 | Interval | Radical | 1900 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
5 | 64 | 32.6 | 5 | Interval | Ultraradical | 1211 | 3 | R0 | R0 |
6 | 51 | 23.8 | 4 | Interval | Radical | 1121 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
7 | 52 | 39 | 4 | Interval | Standard | 586 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
8 | 68 | 24.8 | 5 | Interval | Standard | 488 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
9 | 48 | 31.9 | 5 | Interval | Standard | 3300 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
10 | 88 | 23 | 5 | Interval | Standard | 286 | 1 | Non-R0 | R0 |
11 | 57 | 26.9 | 4 | Primary | Standard | 875 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
12 | 57 | 38.8 | 5 | Interval | Radical | 1765 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
13 | 69 | 28 | 4 | Interval | Standard | 1417 | 1 | R0 | R0 |
14 | 68 | 28.7 | 6 | Interval | Standard | 52 | 2 | Non-R0 | Non-R0 |
15 | 50 | 33.9 | 4 | Interval | Standard | 2454 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
16 | 55 | 33.2 | 4 | Interval | Standard | 1612 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
17 | 68 | 21.6 | 4 | Interval | Ultraradical | 1800 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
18 | 75 | 33.3 | 6 | Interval | Standard | 87 | 2 | Non-R0 | Non-R0 |
19 | 73 | 24.7 | 4 | Primary | Radical | 181 | 2 | R0 | R0 |
20 | 57 | 19.5 | 4 | Primary | Ultraradical | 1176 | 2 | R0 | R0 |