Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the selected researches

From: Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study cohort

Study design

Year (study duration)

Study region

No. (LPS/LPT)

Age (years)

Outcome

Follow up (months)

BMI (kg/m2)

Tumor size (cm)(LPS/LPT)

Method of tumor extraction

No. of tumor spillage (LPS/LPT)

No. of lymph nodes removed (LPS/LPT)

No. of upstaging (LPS/LPT)

No. of adjuvant therapy (LPS/LPT)

No. of recurrence (LPS/LPT)

No. of port-site metastasis (LPS/LPT)

Lu, Q.

retrospective study

2016

China

42/50

LPS:54 (14–69)

OS

82 (16–152)

LPS:23.5 ± 4.0

NR

capsule bag

NR

20/22

9/10

12/15

5/6

0

(2002–2014)

LPT:58 (25–76)

LPT:24.8 ± 3.2

Minig, L.

retrospective comparative observational study

2016

Spain

50/58

LPS:52 (44.8–62.3)

OS/PFS

LPS:25.9 (11.2–38.5)

LPS:23.7 (21.8–27.2)

6.75 / 10.0

endo-bag

NR

15/13.5

12/8

32/34

1/7

0

(2006–2014)

LPT:52 (44.8–65)

LPT:34.3 (28.4–47.8)

LPT:24.6 (21.8–28.5)

Gallotta, V.

retrospective case-control study

2016

Italy

60/120

LPS:48 (24–73)

OS/PFS

38 (24–48)

NR

NR

NR

NR

16/ 18

NR

70%, similar between LPS/LPT

5/16

0

(LPS:2007–2013;LPT:2000–2011)

LPT:55 (22–81)

Ditto, A.

retrospective study

2017

Italy

50/50

LPS:46.0 ± 13.4

OS/PFS

LPS:49.5 ± 64

LPS:25.1 ± 3.4

NR

NR

NR

31/36

10/13

31/28

NR

0

(2005–2015)

LPT:42.8 ± 11.2

LPT:52.6 ± 31.7

LPT:25.8 ± 5.1

Xiong, W.

retrospective study

2017

China

71/31

LPS:47 ± 10

OS

50.5

LPS:23 ± 4

8/14

capsule bag

NR

18.1/15.5

7/2

67/59

11/4

0

(2007–2014)

LPT:49 ± 10

LPT:22 ± 3

Merlier, M.

retrospective study

2000–2018

France

37/107

LPS:56.3 ± 16.8

OS/PFS

LPS:24 (11–50)

LPS:23.8 ± 5.0

NR

NR

NR

28/67

NR

34/96

2/31

0

LPT:56.2 ± 14.7

LPT:42 (22–66)

LPT: 25.4 ± 5.0

  1. LPT Laparotomy, LPS Laparoscopy, BMI Body Mass Index, OS Overall Survival, PFS Progression Free Survival, NR Not Report