Table 2 The performance of two candidate circRNAs and circCOMBO for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
Groups | Best cut-off | AUC(95%CI) | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | P-value | Comparison of AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | P-value | ||||||
circ-0003972 | 0.26 | 0.724(0.632–0.815) | 48 | 92 | p < 0.0001 | circ-0003972 vs. circ-0007288 | 0.2261 |
circ-0007288 | 0.011 | 0.790(0.705–0.875) | 77 | 75 | p < 0.0001 | circ-0003972 vs. circCOMBO | 0.0322 |
circCOMBO | 0.45 | 0.781(0.696–0.867) | 66.7 | 86.7 | NA | circ-0007288 vs. circCOMBO | 0.8210 |