Skip to main content

Table 3 Secretory phenotype of peritoneal mesothelial cells subjected to a conditioned medium generated by young and senescent ovarian cancer cells

From: Pro-cancerogenic effects of spontaneous and drug-induced senescence of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo: a comparative analysis

 

No drugs (spontaneous)

CPT + PCT in vitro

Process

Protein

young

senescent

senescent

Angiogenesis

ANG1 (pg/105 cells)

87 ± 8

245 ± 12a

192 ± 10a*

CXCL8/IL-8 (pg/105 cells)

53 ± 4

104 ± 6a

79 ± 2a*

FGF5 (pg/105 cells)

18 ± 3

41 ± 3a

43 ± 3a

VEGF (pg/105 cells)

66 ± 1

579 ± 50a

351 ± 29a*

ECM remodeling and invasion

ADAM12 (pg/105 cells)

12 ± 1

46 ± 7a

39 ± 4a

PDGF-D (fg/105 cells)

46 ± 5

173 ± 17a

122 ± 4a*

tPA (pg/105 cells)

7 ± 1

38 ± 4a

20 ± 2 a*

TGF-β1 (pg/105 cells)

61 ± 5

366 ± 32a

261 ± 17a*

TIMP-1 (pg/105 cells)

69 ± 3

193 ± 12a

185 ± 10a

uPA (pg/105 cells)

18 ± 1

50 ± 2a

48 ± 4a

Inflammation

CCL2/MCP-1 (pg/105 cells)

16 ± 1

60 ± 13a

75 ± 7a

ICAM-1 (pg/105 cells)

7 ± 1

38 ± 5a

35 ± 2a

IL-6 (pg/105 cells)

65 ± 4

463 ± 44a

274 ± 5a*

VCAM-1 (pg/105 cells)

46 ± 2

104 ± 10a

76 ± 7a*

Proliferation and migration

CCL11 (pg/105 cells)

4 ± 1

13 ± 1a

12 ± 1a

CXCL1/GRO-1 (pg/105 cells)

16 ± 1

75 ± 7a

64 ± 9a

CXCL12/SDF-1 (pg/105 cells)

83 ± 5

101 ± 5a

178 ± 8a*

IGF-1 (pg/105 cells)

10 ± 1

45 ± 5a

47 ± 7a

NRP-1 (pg/105 cells)

72 ± 5

112 ± 16a

184 ± 2a*

  1. Note that “young” cells in the “no drugs” group are common for “no drugs” senescent cells and “CPT + PCT in vitro senescent” cells (they originate from the same donor). Experiments were performed using mesothelial cells (pooled) and ovarian cancer cells from 6 different patients. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. aP < 0.05 vs. young no drugs cells; *—P < 0.05 vs. senescent no drugs cells