Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical base information of patients with different pathological types of tumors

From: Can the ultrasound microcystic pattern accurately predict borderline ovarian tumors?

 

Pathology results

Benign (n = 237)

Borderline (n = 68)

Malignant (n = 88)

With/without ascites (cases)

16/221

12/56a

28/60a,b

Maximum diameter of lesion (mm)

70.0(50.6 ~ 98.8)

121.9(77.3 ~ 180.6)a

119.0(81.4 ~ 152.0)a

Absence/presence > 10 cyst locules (cases)

231/6

52/16a

80/8a,b

With/without solid components (cases)

115/122

60/8a

85/3a,b

Diameter of largest solid component (mm)

29.6(18.1 ~ 46.9)

33.5(14.0 ~ 67.0)

558.0(38.4 ~ 85.5)a,b

With/without papillary projection (cases)

64/173

52/16a

59/29a

Yes/No ≥ 3 papillary projections (cases)

33/204

15/53

30/58a

Yes/No thick septum exists(cases)

58/179

17/51

39/49a,b

With/without blood flow (cases)

29/208

31/37a

66/22a,b

Sparse/abundant blood flow (cases)

232/5

62/6a

72/16a

Tumor regular/irregular (cases)

151/86

12/56a

9/79a

With/without acoustic shadows (cases)

41/196

7/61

14/74

With/without MCP (cases)

5/232

34/34a

16/72a,b

  1. aP<0.05 compared with benign tumors
  2. bP<0.05 compared with BOTs