Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of embryo transfer cycles outcome between two groups

From: Adding L-carnitine to antagonist ovarian stimulation doesn’t improve the outcomes of IVF/ ICSI cycle in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

Variable

L-carnitine group

n = 47

Placebo group

n = 50

p-value*

The number of cases that have not referred for frozen embryo transfer until the time of data analysis

5 (10.6%)

3 (6%)

0.65

No. of transferred embryos in fresh cycles

2.1 (0.37)

2.2 (0.44)

0.71

No. of transferred embryos in FET cycles

2.0 (0.27)

2.0 (0.37)

0.38

Implantation rate in fresh ET cycle (mean ± SE)

0.25 (0.25)

0.26 (0.11)

0.95

Clinical pregnancy rate/ fresh ET

1/7 (14.3%)

3/9 (33.3%)

0.58

Ongoing pregnancy rate/fresh ET

1/7 (14.3%)

2/9 (22.2%)

0.68

Implantation rate in FET cycle

0.54 (0.35)

0.52 (0.27)

0.89

The clinical pregnancy rate /FET cycle

17 /35 (48.5%)

20 /38 (52.6%)

0.71

The ongoing pregnancy rate/ FET cycle

15 / 35 (42.8%)

19 / 38 (50.0%)

0.70

Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate/total ET cycles

16 /42 (43.2%)

21/ 47 (56.8%)

0.67

  1. Values are presented as the mean ± Standard deviation (SD) and number (percent).*Obtained by independent t test and chi square test. Statistically significant level was 0.05. No. number; FET frozen embryo transfer