Table 4 Association between quartiles of SII and laboratory data among the whole participants (N = 966)
Variable | Crude model (β, 95%CI, P) | Minimally adjusted model(β, 95%CI, P) | Fully adjusted model(β, 95%CI, P) |
|---|---|---|---|
No. of available embryos | |||
 SII quartile | |||
   Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
   Q2 | 0.86 (0.08, 1.64), 0.032 | 0.64 (-0.08, 1.36), 0.082 | 0.74 (0.02, 1.46), 0.046 |
   Q3 | 0.76 (-0.02, 1.54), 0.058 | 0.07 (-0.64, 0.79), 0.838 | 0.12 (-0.60, 0.84), 0.748 |
   Q4 | 0.11 (-0.68, 0.89), 0.788 | -0.72 (-1.45, 0.01), 0.052 | -0.71 (-1.44, 0.02), 0.056 |
   Log SII | 0.27 (-0.42, 0.95), 0.445 | -0.56 (-1.19, 0.08), 0.089 | -0.57 (-1.21, 0.07), 0.079 |
  P for trenda | 0.8601 | 0.0195 | 0.0187 |
Available embryo rate | |||
 SII quartile | |||
   Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
   Q2 | 0.03 (-0.01, 0.07) 0.163 | 0.02 (-0.02, 0.07) 0.247 | 0.03 (-0.02, 0.07) 0.239 |
   Q3 | 0.01 (-0.03, 0.06) 0.507 | 0.01 (-0.03, 0.06) 0.525 | 0.01 (-0.03, 0.06) 0.541 |
   Q4 | -0.10 (-0.14, -0.06) < 0.0001 | -0.10 (-0.15, -0.06) < 0.0001 | -0.11 (-0.15, -0.06) < 0.0001 |
   SII Log | -0.08 (-0.11, -0.04) < 0.0001 | -0.08 (-0.12, -0.04) < 0.0001 | -0.08 (-0.12, -0.04) < 0.0001 |
  P for trenda |  < 0.0001 |  < 0.0001 |  < 0.0001 |
High-quality embryos | |||
 SII quartile | |||
  Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref |
  Q2 | 0.46 (-0.15, 1.08) 0.136 | 0.31 (-0.28, 0.89) 0.303 | 0.33 (-0.25, 0.92) 0.266 |
  Q3 | 0.54 (-0.07, 1.15) 0.084 | 0.04 (-0.55, 0.62) 0.903 | 0.05 (-0.53, 0.64) 0.856 |
  Q4 | 0.41 (-0.20, 1.02) 0.185 | -0.17 (-0.76, 0.42) 0.569 | -0.17 (-0.76, 0.43) 0.583 |
   Log SII | 0.48 (-0.05, 1.01) 0.0789 | -0.09 (-0.60, 0.42) 0.733 | -0.09 (-0.60, 0.43) 0.745 |
  P for trenda | 0.182 | 0.411 | 0.417 |