Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic efficiency of the clinical, radiomic, and combined models in the training and test cohorts

From: Development and validation of an ultrasound‑based radiomics nomogram to predict lymph node status in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis

 

Training cohort

Test cohort

AUC (95% CI)

SEN

SPE

ACC

AUC (95% CI)

SEN

SPE

ACC

Clinical model

0.770 (0.719–0.822)

0.732

0.696

0.711

0.735 (0.622–0.848)

0.571

0.841

0.722

Radiomics model

0.899 (0.864–0.933)

0.877

0.804

0.835

0.855 (0.774–0.935)

0.943

0.636

0.772

Combined model

0.930 (0.902–0.958)

0.833

0.902

0.873

0.881 (0.801–0.954)

0.714

0.886

0.810

  1. Abbreviations AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; ACC, accuracy
Back to article page

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us