Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between triglyceride glucose-body Mass Index and in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a cohort study

Journal of Ovarian Research volume 17, Article number: 90 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive disorder that frequently affects fertility. The TyG-BMI (Triglyceride glucose-body mass) index is a newly explored parameter that may be linked to reproductive results in individuals with PCOS. Nevertheless, its connection with outcomes in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) procedures remains uncertain.

Methods

This study included a total of 966 females who underwent IVF treatments for PCOS. At the baseline, the participants were categorized into four groups according to the quartiles of TyG-BMI measured prior to oocyte retrieval. Subsequently, the study compared the differences in clinical and laboratory outcomes among these four groups.

Results

Patients in higher TyG-BMI quartiles exhibited a decreased number of retrieved oocytes, 2PN embryos, and available/high-quality embryos (P < 0.05 for Q1-Q4). Additionally, the multivariable regression analysis revealed that individuals in the top quartile of TyG-BMI had a lower count of accessible embryos (β = -0.224, P = 0.257) and a decreased number of high-quality embryos (β = -0.352, P = 0.028) in comparison to those in the lowest quartile. Nevertheless, there were no notable variances detected in the rates of pregnancy or live births among these quartiles. Furthermore, a linear correlation was noted between the TyG-BMI index and the quantity of accessible embryos (P-non-linear = 0.6, P-overall < 0.001), along with high-quality embryos (P-nonlinear = 0.026, P-overall = 0.006). In contrast, there was no notable linear correlation found between the TyG-BMI index and the available embryo rate (P-nonlinear = 0.60, P-overall = 0.8).

Conclusions

The results of this research emphasize the notable correlation between TyG-BMI and IVF results in females diagnosed with PCOS. The interplay of insulin resistance and disorders of lipid metabolism may indeed play a pivotal role in influencing the assisted reproductive outcomes of patients with PCOS. Considering these findings, TyG-BMI proves to be a valuable indicator for exploring this potential association.

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a major cause of female infertility, posing significant challenges to reproduction. Affecting a significant portion of women during their childbearing years, its prevalence is estimated to range from 6 to 20% [1, 2]. To diagnose PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria, it is necessary to have at least two of the following symptoms: oligoanovulation, signs of hyperandrogenism (either clinical or biochemical), and the identification of polycystic ovaries using ultrasound [3], other endocrine disorders should be ruled out. Metabolic irregularities linked to PCOS can disrupt ovarian functionality and follicle growth, leading to diminished quality and quantity of oocytes, alongside lower rates of pregnancy and live births. The manifestation of PCOS symptoms varies considerably among individuals, and its precise cause remains unclear. According to recent research, the development of PCOS may have multiple causes, including oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4], inflammatory responses [5], genetic factors [6], excessive embryonic androgen exposure [7], unhealthy lifestyle choices [8], and hormonal imbalances [9]. Furthermore, mounting evidence suggests that insulin resistance (IR) is a key factor in the development of PCOS, which is associated with an increased susceptibility to metabolic disorders like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [10].

PCOS shares numerous pathophysiological traits with Metabolic syndrome (MetS), which is defined by a collection of metabolic dysfunctions such as central obesity, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, and elevated blood sugar levels. Research indicates a higher prevalence of MetS among PCOS patients compared to the general population, underscoring the role of IR as a central component of both conditions [11]. Although the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC) test is considered the most accurate method for evaluating insulin resistance, its extensive intricacy and high expenses restrict its widespread adoption. HIEC, in correlation with the homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR), presents a viable alternative for conducting extensive studies [12]. Nevertheless, routine health examinations and clinical practices seldom measure insulin levels, making HOMA-IR data acquisition challenging [13]. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, developed by South American researchers, has shown a strong correlation with both HIEC and HOMA-IR [14], presenting a more accessible and cost-effective method for evaluating IR.

Obesity, measured through body mass index (BMI), is another significant element linked with insulin resistance (IR) [15]. The TyG-BMI index, combining the TyG index and BMI, has demonstrated a close correlation with HOMA-IR in assessing IR in Korean and Chinese populations [16, 17]. This index has proven more effective than the TyG index alone in predicting metabolic diseases and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [18,19,20]. Nevertheless, the correlation between the TyG-BMI index and the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in women with PCOS has not been thoroughly investigated. Women with PCOS often rely on assisted reproductive technology (ART) for conception due to challenges in oocyte maturation and other fertility factors. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol has become increasingly popular, among individuals with PCOS due to its shorter duration of stimulation, decreased need for gonadotropins, and reduced risk of OHSS (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome) [21]. Success rates of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in women with PCOS exhibit significant variability, which is affected by multiple factors such as the woman’s age, ovarian reserve health, stimulation protocol approach, embryo quality, and endometrial receptivity Several studies have investigated the role of IR, dyslipidemia, and obesity as potential predictors of IVF outcomes in women with PCOS, but the results are inconsistent and inconclusive [22, 23]. Moreover, most of these studies have used single or isolated measures of metabolic parameters, which may not reflect the complex interaction between IR and other metabolic factors. To address these concerns, our study aimed to investigate the relationship between the TyG-BMI index, measured prior to oocyte retrieval, and the effectiveness of assisted conception in PCOS patients undergoing treatment with the GnRH-ant protocol.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

Conducted at Nanjing Medical University’s Women’s Hospital between January 2018 and September 2020, our study involved a cohort of participants and followed a hospital-based design. This study primarily examined PCOS patients experiencing their first IVF or ICSI (Intracytoplasmic sperm injection) embryo transfer (ET).To be eligible to participate, women between the ages of 20 and 40 with a diagnosis of PCOS based on the Rotterdam criteria [3], needed to meet at least two of the following conditions: experiencing irregular or absent ovulation, showing signs of hyperandrogenism either clinically or biochemically, and having polycystic ovaries. Other potential causes such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting neoplasms, or Cushing’s syndrome had to be ruled out. The utilization of either in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the process of fertilization [3]. Following the GnRH-ant protocol for PCOS management. We excluded subjects for reasons such as: [1] Infertility causes unrelated to PCOS [2]. Previous ovarian surgeries or concurrent issues like endometriosis [3]. Disorders in liver, kidney, or thyroid function.Conditions that prevent ART or pregnancy include recurrent miscarriages (three or more losses), abnormalities in the uterus, chromosomal anomalies in parents, or any other condition that hinders the ability to conceive [5]. Male factor infertility (We defined male factor infertility as having one or more of the following abnormalities: sperm concentration < 15 million/ml, total sperm count < 39 million, progressive motility < 32%, normal morphology < 4%, or total motile sperm count < 9 million) [24].

Ovarian stimulation protocol

A flexible GnRH-ant regimen was employed.From the second or third day of their menstrual cycle, the participants were given daily doses of 150–225 IU of recombinant FSH (rFSH, Gonal-F, Merck Serono, Italy). Once the dominant follicle exceeded 12–14 mm, the protocol was modified to incorporate a daily dose of 0.25 mg of GnRH-ant (Cetrorelix, Merck Serono, Darmstadt, Germany). Regular monitoring of follicular growth through ultrasound and hormone levels (FSH, LH, E2, P) enabled tailored adjustments to the Gn dosage. Once there were at least two follicles that measured more than 18 mm, a dose of hCG (Lizhu, China) of 10,000 IU was administered to facilitate oocyte maturation.Oocyte collection was scheduled 36 h post-hCG administration.A reduced hCG dose (5,000 IU) was utilized for ovulation induction in cases with a high OHSS risk.On ovulation trigger day, we assessed serum sex hormones and endometrial thickness.

Oocyte Retrieval and embryo transfer

As detailed in our previous publication [25], we utilized specific methods for culturing oocytes and embryos. The decision between traditional IVF and ICSI was based on sperm quality. Post-fertilization, embryos were cultured until day 3 (D3) or day 5 (D5). The embryo transfer, limited to two embryos at a time, was performed under ultrasound guidance, either on D3 or D5 following oocyte collection. From the day after retrieval, participants received bi-daily 20 mg progesterone injections throughout the luteal phase. Guided by the policy of our center, only embryos at the D3 stage were transferred.

Freeze-all strategy

In cases like high OHSS risk, thin endometrium, elevated progesterone levels, or personal preference, we employed the “freeze-all” approach. Criteria for this included age under 35, the use of hCG in ovarian stimulation, more than 20 follicles > 14 mm, or E2 levels above 5000 pg/ml on the trigger day, and insufficient endometrial thickness (< 7 mm).

Exposure definitions

All participants had their blood samples collected before commencing IVF treatment. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), and triglyceride (TG) levels were measured using an autoanalyzer (AU 5800, Beckman Coulter). An exposure variable [17] was utilized as the TyG-BMI index, which was computed as the natural logarithm of [TG (mg/dL) × FBG (mg/dL)/2] × BMI [17].

Outcome definitions

Clinical outcomes

We have defined the term ‘live birth’ as the act of giving birth to one or more infants who are alive and have reached a gestation period of at least 24 weeks. An elevated level of serum hCG (> 5 mIU/mL) was observed 14 days after embryo transfer, indicating a ‘biochemical pregnancy’ without the presence of a gestational sac confirmed by ultrasound. It was determined that a “clinical pregnancy” had been established 35 days after embryo transfer when an ultrasound detected a gestational sac with an observable fetal heartbeat. Early pregnancy losses [25] encompassed spontaneous miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy occurring prior to 12 weeks of gestation [26].

Laboratory outcomes

Our study measured several parameters related to oocytes and embryos. The parameters measured encompassed the overall count of oocytes collected, the number of two-pronucleus (2PN) oocytes, the quantity and rate of 2PN cleavage embryos, the count of viable embryos, the proportion of high-quality embryos, and the percentage of blastocyst formation. Using the Gardner Embryo/Blastocyst Grading System, which has three parts: a letter and two numbers, a morphologically “perfect” day 5 embryo transfer would be a 4AA; good expansion and excellent inner cell mass and trophectoderm. A grade 3 embryo may also be of good quality if its appearance can be explained by asynchronous cell division rather than by poor development. For day 3 embryos, the number of cells and the degree of fragmentation are the main criteria. An embryo that has 8 or more cells and less than 20% fragmentation is considered to have a high quality [27, 28].

Statistical analysis

At the beginning of the study, the participants were categorized into four groups according to their TyG-BMI index quartiles. Mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) were used to express continuous data, depending on distribution, whereas frequencies or percentages were used to represent categorical data. We employed One-Way ANOVA for data following a normal distribution, the Kruskal Wallis H test for skewed data, and the chi-square test for categorical variables to analyze differences in means and proportions. Univariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between the TyG-BMI index and different outcomes. The results were presented in three models: unadjusted, minimally adjusted, and fully adjusted. In order to investigate the connections between the TyG-BMI index and the results of IVF/ICSI, we employed Generalized Additive Models (GAM) and Restricted cubic splines (RCS). Continuous confounders were incorporated into the RCS model with fixed points at the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles to analyze non-linear associations and dose-response relationships [29, 30]. For detailed analysis in univariate and multivariate models, the TyG-BMI index was normalized (Z-score) to evaluate the effect of each standard deviation increase on reproductive results. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) and levels of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) on the relationship. Separately, the analysis was conducted on the interactions between the TyG-BMI index and these factors.A P-value of less than 0.05 was chosen as the threshold for statistical significance.R software (http //www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (http//:www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solution, Inc., Boston, MA) were utilized for conducting all statistical analyses.

Results

Baseline characteristics of study participants

Figure 1 shows a flow chart of the study population. The TyG-BMI index of the study participants was categorized into four quartiles based on their baseline values (Quartile 1 (Q1): < 176.93, Quartile 2 (Q2): 176.93-203.19, Quartile 3 (Q3): 203.19-233.05, Quartile 4 (Q4): ≥ 233.05). The baseline characteristics of these groups are presented in Table 1, categorized based on their TyG-BMI index levels. Significantly lower BMI, shorter infertility duration, reduced Gn dosage, and lower progesterone levels on hCG administration day were observed in the Q1-Q3 groups, in contrast to the Q4 group with the highest TyG-BMI index.Significant variations were observed across the groups, showing an inverse relationship between the TyG-BMI index values and the levels of AMH and Antral Follicle Count (AFC).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow-chart of the study cohort characteristics

PCOS, Polycystic Ovary Syndorme; TyG-BMI, Triglyceride glucose-body mass

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants by quartiles of TyG‑BMI index (N = 966)
Full size table
Table 2 ART outcome between the four groups
Full size table

When comparing the laboratory results, it was evident that there was a noticeable decline in the quantity of oocytes obtained as we transitioned from Q1 to Q4, as showed in Table 2. Patients in higher quantiles had a tendency to retrieve fewer oocytes, with the median count decreasing from 16.00 in Q1 to 13.00 in Q4. Likewise, there was an observable decline in the quantity of 2PN cleavage and the quantity of 2PN throughout the quantiles. Patients in the higher quantiles exhibited fewer 2PN cleavage and 2PN counts, signifying a potential decrease in fertility parameters as quantiles increased. Interestingly, while the cleavage rate showed a slight decrease across the quantiles, this variation was minimal. Patients from Q1 to Q4 had cleavage rates of 99.82–99.39% respectively, suggesting relatively consistent cleavage rates irrespective of quantile classification.

Univariate analysis

The outcomes of the univariate analysis are detailed in Table 3 and Supplementary Table 1. The number of available embryos is positively correlated with AMH, basal LH, and AFC, as shown in Table 3. On the other hand, the TyG-BMI index, basal FSH, BMI, initial Gn dose, total Gn dose, and duration of Gn administration exhibited a negative correlation with the quantity of embryos that were available. The univariate analysis pertaining to high-quality embryos is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Table 3 The results of uivariate analysis
Full size table

The relationship between TyG-BMI index and laboratory outcomes

Table 4 presents the correlation between the quartiles of the TyG-BMI index and laboratory results.In our analysis, we utilized a univariate linear regression model to evaluate the connections between the quartiles of the TyG-BMI index and these outcomes. This assessment included both non-adjusted and adjusted models.

Table 4 Association between quartiles of TyG-BMI index and laboratory data among the whole participants (N = 966)
Full size table

In the crude model, the TyG-BMI index demonstrated no significant link with the proportion of usable embryos. Nonetheless, an inverse relationship was noted with both the quantity of usable embryos and the number of embryos of superior quality. In the model with minimal adjustments, which took into account age, AMH, BMI, and AFC, the higher quartiles of the TyG-BMI index exhibited inverse associations with the quantity of usable embryos (β = -0.224, 95%, trend P-value = 0.257) and the count of high-quality embryos (β = -0.352, 95%, trend P-value = 0.028), when compared to the lowest quartile.

No significant correlations were observed between the quartiles of the TyG-BMI index and the proportion of usable embryos. This trend persisted in the fully adjusted model, which also included variables such as baseline FSH, E2, LH levels, AMH, AFC, total Gn dosage, duration of Gn administration, E2 levels on the day of hCG administration, and Progesterone levels on the day of hCG administration.

The analyses of non-linear relationship

We examined the correlation between the TyG-BMI index and different outcomes in our research, considering that the TyG-BMI index is a continuous variable, as shown in Fig. 2.To define this non-linear relationship, we established RCS models for the TyG-BMI index (per 1 unit increase).

According to the RCS models, there was a direct correlation observed between the TyG-BMI index and the quantity of embryos accessible (P-non-linear = 0.6, P-overall < 0.001), as well as with the number of superior embryos (P-nonlinear = 0.026, P-overall = 0.006). Nevertheless, based on the RCS model, there was no substantial correlation observed between the TyG-BMI index and the rate of accessible embryos (P-nonlinear = 0.60, P-overall = 0.8).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between TyG-BMI index and reproductive outcomes. (A) High quality embryos. (B) No. of available embryos. (C) Available embryo rate. The models were adjusted for age, duration of infertility, BMI, basal FSH, AMH, starting and total dose of Gn, duration and total dose of GnRH-ant, endometrial thickness on trigger day, E2 and P on HCG start day

Full size image

Univariable and Multivariate regression analysis of pregnancy outcomes

The findings in Table 5 indicate that neither univariate nor multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed any significant associations between different quartiles of the TyG-BMI index and various reproductive outcomes.The results encompass the rate of biochemical pregnancy (BPR), rate of clinical pregnancy (CPR), rate of live birth (LBR), and rate of early pregnancy loss (EPLR).

Table 5 Univariable and Multivariate regression analysis of pregnancy outcomes among the whole participants
Full size table

Subgroup analysis

To evaluate the impact of potential confounding factors, such as AMH and BMI, subgroup analyses were performed as outlined in Table 6.Significant interactions were observed between the subgroups categorized by AMH levels and the influence of the TyG-BMI index on the quantity of accessible embryos (P-value for interaction = 0.012). Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 also demonstrated comparable results concerning the impact of the TyG-BMI index on the rates of available embryos and high-quality embryos.

Table 6 Subgroup analysis for association between TyG-BMI index (per 1 SD) and No. of available embryos
Full size table

Discussion

Our research examined the correlation between the TyG-BMI indicator and females diagnosed with PCOS who are receiving treatment through the GnRH-ant protocol. The key outcomes revealed that higher TyG-BMI index values were associated with less favorable ovarian responses. This was evidenced by a lower yield of retrieved oocytes, a decreased number of 2PN embryos, and compromised embryo quality. However, there was no notable association found between the TyG-BMI index and pregnancy or live birth results, possibly due to the limited availability of fresh embryo transfer data. While prior studies have linked various metabolic parameters to reproductive outcomes [31,32,33], this research represents the first analysis specifically examining the predictive utility of TyG-BMI for IVF success in a PCOS population. Our study indicates that TyG-BMI, similar to its role in cardiovascular research, could potentially be used as a predictive indicator for reproductive outcomes in addition to its significance in predicting cardiovascular events in CAD patients.

Many PCOS patients exhibit metabolic abnormalities, including IR, impaired glucose tolerance, a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and factors that make them more susceptible to cardiovascular diseases [34]. There is a notable overlap in the pathophysiological and clinical features of PCOS and MetS, with MetS and its individual elements often present in those with PCOS [35]. The prevalence of MetS in individuals with PCOS is said to be approximately 43%, which is almost twice as high as the rate observed in females of similar age in the overall population.In particular, there were 50 individuals diagnosed with MetS, 23 displayed a single metabolic abnormality, and 12 presented with two metabolic irregularities. Consequently, 85 patients, or 63.4% of the PCOS group, showed varying degrees of metabolic issues [36]. Dyslipidemia, a critical aspect of MetS, is prevalent in approximately 70% of PCOS patients [37]. A substantial amount of evidence indicates that insulin resistance is a notable contributing factor to various conditions including type 2 diabetes mellitus, lipid disorders, excessive weight, and heart diseases [38]. The lipoprotein profile is significantly modified by IR, resulting in changes to the amount and characteristics of TG, TC transport, and lipoprotein oxidation. These alterations influence the development of atherosclerosis [39]. In relation to metabolic irregularities, numerous women with PCOS display traits that are consistent with metabolic syndrome, including elevated levels of TG, total TC, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as well as decreased levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [40]. Prior studies have demonstrated that IR is linked to the advancement of cardiovascular diseases and can predict cardiovascular outcomes [41]. Consequently, the TyG index was developed as a tool to assess IR. Additionally, BMI is widely recognized as a measure of obesity and an indicator of IR. Professor Er and colleagues introduced the TyG-BMI index in 2016, which is a combination of the TyG index and BMI [17]. It was discovered in a study that TyG-BMI was a more accurate indicator of insulin resistance compared to TyG [16]. Studies have indicated that the TyG-BMI indicator is superior to the TyG indicator alone when it comes to identifying NAFLD in non-obese patients [42]. According to recent studies, the TyG-BMI indicator outperforms the TyG indicator in accurately detecting metabolic syndrome among individuals with PCOS [19]. The discovery implies that the TyG-BMI index can serve as a holistic indicator for overall health problems.

Our study found that higher TyG-BMI quartiles were linked to a reduced quantity and quality of embryos, supporting the idea that metabolic disruptions can have negative impacts on reproductive processes.This parallel between cardiovascular and reproductive outcomes underscores the systemic impact of metabolic dysregulation. Further investigation is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms that determine the association between the TyG-BMI index and reproductive outcomes in women diagnosed with PCOS. This association can be explained in various ways.Firstly, IR is regarded as the core mechanism of PCOS pathogenesis, IR and hyperinsulinemia are common features of PCOS and MetS, and they can impair the ovarian function and the oocyte quality in several ways.First, hyperinsulinemia can stimulate the ovarian theca cells to produce more androgens, which can inhibit the follicular development and the aromatization of androgens to estrogens [43]. Furthermore, excessive insulin levels can decrease the synthesis of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), leading to elevated levels of unbound androgens and estrogens [44]. Also, hyperinsulinemia has the potential to disrupt the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis, resulting in elevated LH secretion and reduced FSH secretion. This disturbance can negatively impact follicular maturation and ovulation [40]. Fourth, hyperinsulinemia may induce oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis in the ovarian granulosa cells and the oocytes, which can affect the oocyte quality and the embryo development [45]. As TyG-BMI elevations reflect worsening insulin resistance, this provides a plausible Biological link between heightened TyG-BMI and suboptimal embryo yields. The ovotoxic effects of inflammation provide another pathway explaining the TyG-BMI and IVF outcome relationship. Systemic inflammation promotes ovarian oxidative damage which may diminish oocyte quality and embryo competence [46, 47]. Since TyG-BMI tracks with inflammatory burden, greater inflammation among high TyG-BMI females may jeopardize IVF success.

Furthermore, a heightened TyG index indicates more than just insulin resistance; it also indicates a variety of negative health conditions such as cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and disorders in lipid metabolism. Furthermore, the significance of inflammation and oxidative stress plays a vital part in connecting the TyG-BMI index with PCOS.A high TyG index is associated with endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress. Inflammation can impair vascular endothelium, and oxidative stress may similarly damage vascular endothelium, potentially impacting the quality of oocytes and embryos.

PCOS, which is a diverse condition with hormonal imbalances and metabolic issues, impacts multiple aspects of reproduction such as follicle development and embryo implantation [48]. Previous studies have linked PCOS with negative impacts on ovarian response and outcomes of IVF, as well as an increased likelihood of miscarriages [49]. Our multivariate logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate that higher TYG-BMI was negatively associated with BPR, clinical CPR, or LBR. However, the limited quantity of fresh embryo transfers (only 49 out of 966 IVF cycles) restricts interpretability, as most women underwent freeze-all and their later frozen ET outcomes were not tracked. Furthermore, specific details on subsequent frozen ETs, cumulative pregnancy rates accounting for additional frozen cycles, and live births were not adequately recorded. These data constraints preclude sufficiently powered analysis of correlations between TyG-BMI and actual reproductive success… Hence we have refocused this report exclusively on impacts of TyG-BMI on ovarian responses and oocyte/embryo parameters, rather than on underpowered clinical endpoints. Additional investigation is necessary to validate our initial discoveries by conducting studies with larger sample sizes of newly implanted embryos. Notably, there was an intricate interplay observed between the TyG-BMI index and the quantity of high-quality embryos, underscoring the complex connection between MetS and fertility results in individuals with PCOS.

Our research has several strengths. Significantly, this is the initial observational study that reveals the correlation between the TyG-BMI indicator and the outcomes of ARTin females diagnosed with PCOS. Additionally, we accounted for various confounding factors to ensure more reliable results. Nevertheless, it is important to take into account certain restrictions.Because our study is observational and conducted in a single center, we are unable to establish causality. Furthermore, measurements of triglycerides, glucose, and other parameters were only taken at the beginning of the study and could have potentially fluctuated throughout the follow-up period as a result of alterations in the participants’ lifestyles and medication usage. Third, the frequency of fresh embryo transfers in PCOS patients was lower, attributed to their higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Moreover, other variables like therapies for metabolic syndrome, eating patterns, and levels of physical exercise were not taken into consideration. Consequently, future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better establish causality.

Conclusions

According to our study, there is a connection between higher TyG-BMI levels and less favorable reproductive results in women with PCOS. While the TyG-BMI’s role in cardiovascular prognosis is gaining acceptance, its place in reproductive health is still being charted. Further research should aim to unravel the complex interactions between metabolic health and reproductive success, potentially improving IVF outcomes through targeted metabolic interventions.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(5):487–525. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DI, Norman RJ, Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):544–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rotterdam EA-SP. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Yang Q, Wang H, Zhu J, Cong L, Li H, Sun Y. NAD + deficiency and mitochondrial dysfunction in granulosa cells of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2021;105(2):371–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel S. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), an inflammatory, systemic, lifestyle endocrinopathy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;182:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.04.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stener-Victorin E, Deng Q. Epigenetic inheritance of polycystic ovary syndrome - challenges and opportunities for treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17(9):521–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00517-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma X, Wang Z, Zhang C, Bian Y, Zhang X, Liu X, et al. Association of SNPs in the FK-506 binding protein (FKBP5) gene among Han Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Med Genomics. 2022;15(1):149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01301-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rajkumar E, Ardra A, Prabhu G, Pandey V, Sundaramoorthy J, Manzoor R, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome: an exploration of unmarried women’s knowledge and attitudes. Heliyon. 2022;8(7):e09835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham Gnanadass S, Divakar Prabhu Y, Valsala Gopalakrishnan A. Association of metabolic and inflammatory markers with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): an update. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(3):631–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05951-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Wu D, Guo H, Li M. Hyperandrogenemia and insulin resistance: the chief culprit of polycystic ovary syndrome. Life Sci. 2019;236:116940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gluvic Z, Zaric B, Resanovic I, Obradovic M, Mitrovic A, Radak D, et al. Link between metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;15(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570161114666161007164510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonora E, Targher G, Alberiche M, Bonadonna RC, Saggiani F, Zenere MB, et al. Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.1.57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez-Garcia G, Rodriguez-Ramos M, Santos-Medina M, Mata-Cuevas LA, Carrero-Vazquez AM, Chipi-Rodriguez Y. Triglyceride-glucose index impact on in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Results from the RECUIMA multicenter registry. Gac Med Mex. 2022;158(2):83–9. https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M22000646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nabipoorashrafi SA, Seyedi SA, Rabizadeh S, Ebrahimi M, Ranjbar SA, Reyhan SK, Meysamie A, Nakhjavani M, Esteghamati A. The accuracy of triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index for the screening of metabolic syndrome in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;32(12):2677–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boden G. Obesity, insulin resistance and free fatty acids. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2011;18(2):139–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e3283444b09.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim J, Kim J, Koo SH, Kwon GC. Comparison of triglyceride glucose index, and related parameters to predict insulin resistance in Korean adults: an analysis of the 2007–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0212963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Er LK, Wu S, Chou HH, Hsu LA, Teng MS, Sun YC, et al. Triglyceride glucose-body Mass Index is a simple and clinically useful surrogate marker for insulin resistance in nondiabetic individuals. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0149731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Raimi TH, Dele-Ojo BF, Dada SA, Fadare JO, Ajayi DD, Ajayi EA, et al. Triglyceride-glucose index and related parameters predicted metabolic syndrome in nigerians. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2021;19(2):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2020.0092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Wang H, Ma Q, Liu Y, Chen A, Lu J, et al. Value of the triglyceride-glucose index and non-traditional blood lipid parameters in predicting metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Horm (Athens). 2023;22(2):263–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-023-00438-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang R, Dai L, Zhong Y, Xie G. Usefulness of the triglyceride glucose-body mass index in evaluating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: insights from a general population. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01506-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Sun YF, Xu YM, Shi BJ, Han Y, Luo ZY, et al. Effect of Endometrium Thickness on Clinical outcomes in Luteal Phase Short-Acting GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH-Ant protocol. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:578783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.578783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang H, Zhang Y, Fang X, Kwak-Kim J, Wu L. Insulin resistance adversely affect IVF outcomes in lean women without PCOS. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:734638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.734638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang H, Chen L, Shi H, Huang N, Chi H, Yang R, et al. P-610 lipid metabolism mediated the effect of glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance on IVF/ICSI outcomes in PCOS women. Hum Reprod. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead093.939.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the examination and Processing of Human Semen. 6th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2021. [(accessed on 3 December 2021)]. Available online. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030787.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen X, Zhang J, Wu X, Cao S, Zhou L, Wang Y, et al. Trophectoderm morphology predicts outcomes of pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in a Chinese population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(11):1475–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0317-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Desai NN, Goldstein J, Rowland DY, Goldfarb JM. Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(10):2190–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.10.2190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med. 2010;29(9):1037–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steenland K, Deddens JA. A practical guide to dose-response analyses and risk assessment in occupational epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2004;15(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000100287.45004.e7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Abdalla H, Nikolau D, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, et al. Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6):723–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Babu A, Devi Rajeswari V, Ganesh V, Das S, Dhanasekaran S, Usha Rani G, et al. Gut microbiome and polycystic ovary syndrome: interplay of Associated Microbial-Metabolite pathways and therapeutic strategies. Reprod Sci. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01450-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lakoma K, Kukharuk O, Sliz D. The influence of metabolic factors and Diet on Fertility. Nutrients. 2023;15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051180.

  34. Scarfo G, Daniele S, Fusi J, Gesi M, Martini C, Franzoni F, et al. Metabolic and molecular mechanisms of Diet and Physical Exercise in the management of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Biomedicines. 2022;10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061305.

  35. Ehrmann DA, Liljenquist DR, Kasza K, Azziz R, Legro RS, Ghazzi MN, et al. Prevalence and predictors of the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Madani T, Hosseini R, Ramezanali F, Khalili G, Jahangiri N, Ahmadi J, et al. Metabolic syndrome in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(3):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. European Association for the Study of the L. European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tello-Flores VA, Beltran-Anaya FO, Ramirez-Vargas MA, Esteban-Casales BE, Navarro-Tito N, Alarcon-Romero LDC, et al. Role of long non-coding RNAs and the Molecular mechanisms involved in insulin resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147256.

  39. Mocciaro G, D’Amore S, Jenkins B, Kay R, Murgia A, Herrera-Marcos LV, et al. Lipidomic approaches to study HDL metabolism in patients with central obesity diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126786.

  40. Marshall JC, Dunaif A. Should all women with PCOS be treated for insulin resistance? Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill MA, Yang Y, Zhang L, Sun Z, Jia G, Parrish AR, et al. Insulin resistance, cardiovascular stiffening and cardiovascular disease. Metabolism. 2021;119:154766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang S, Du T, Li M, Jia J, Lu H, Lin X, et al. Triglyceride glucose-body mass index is effective in identifying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese subjects. Med (Baltim). 2017;96(22):e7041. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Balasubramanian A, Pachiappan S, Mohan S, Adhikesavan H, Karuppasamy I, Ramalingam K. Therapeutic exploration of polyherbal formulation against letrozole induced PCOS rats: a mechanistic approach. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e15488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sherif K, Kushner H, Falkner BE. Sex hormone-binding globulin and insulin resistance in African-American women. Metabolism. 1998;47(1):70–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(98)90195-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dimova R, Chakarova N, Grozeva G, Kirilov G, Tankova T. The relationship between glucose variability and insulin sensitivity and oxidative stress in subjects with prediabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;158:107911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yan F, Zhao Q, Li Y, Zheng Z, Kong X, Shu C, et al. The role of oxidative stress in ovarian aging: a review. J Ovarian Res. 2022;15(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01032-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Smits MAJ, Schomakers BV, van Weeghel M, Wever EJM, Wust RCI, Dijk F, et al. Human ovarian aging is characterized by oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(11):2208–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Inal HA, Yilmaz N, Gorkem U, Oruc AS, Timur H. The impact of follicular fluid adiponectin and ghrelin levels based on BMI on IVF outcomes in PCOS. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39(4):431–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0392-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rittenberg V, Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, Sobaleva S, Oteng-Ntim E, El-Toukhy T. Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):421–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the physicians, nurses, and scientific staff of Department of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital.

Funding

The writers revealed that they received financial assistance for conducting the research, writing, and/or publishing of this article. The study was funded by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC 2700601-1) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Project in Jiangsu Province (JX10413752).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin Li, Ting Luan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, 123 Tianfeixiang, Mochou Road, Qinhuai District, Nanjing, JiangSu, China

    Xin Li, Yi Wei, JuanJuan Zhang, Chun Zhao & Xiufeng Ling

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children’s Healthcare Hospital, Nanjing, China

    Ting Luan

Authors
  1. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ting Luan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. JuanJuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chun Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiufeng Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.L participated in the inception, development, statistical analysis, and drafting of the manuscript.T.L, and J.J.Z.participated in gathering data and drafting the manuscript.The final version for submission was approved by all authors.XF.L. and C.Z. supervised the study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chun Zhao or Xiufeng Ling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The writers confirm that all individuals gave their consent to publish the data collected for the research after being informed.

Statement of Ethics

The retrospective cohort investigation was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (2023KY-083). As the study was conducted retrospectively and analyzed patient data anonymously, there was no need for informed patient consent.The Ethics Committee of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital issued a declaration that eliminated the requirement for obtaining informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Luan, T., Wei, Y. et al. The association between triglyceride glucose-body Mass Index and in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a cohort study. J Ovarian Res 17, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01416-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01416-1

Keywords

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us