Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the papers included in the analysis evaluating the relationship between zygote morphology and biological and clinical outcomes

From: Pronuclear morphology evaluation for fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: a systematic review

Authors

Design

Age (yrs)

Zygotes (n.)

ART procedure

TOPI

Zygote score

Outcome measures

EQ

CS

BS

IR

PR

D/LBR

ECS

Scott et al. 2000 [10]

P

<43

3,701

IVF/ICSI

NA

Modified from Scott and Smith, 1998

Yes

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Wittemer et al. 2000 [11]

P

NA

1,000

IVF/ICSI

18h

Modified from Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Yes

NA

NA

Tesarik et al. 2000 [12]

R

NA

350

ICSI

14–17h

Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Not

Not

NA

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Ludwig et al. 2000 [13]

P

NA

405

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott and Smith, 1998

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Yes

NA

NA

Balaban et al. 2001 [14]

R

NA

86

ICSI

14–17h

Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Salumets et al. 2001 [15]

P

NA

2,284

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott and Smith, 1998/Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Not

Yes*

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Montag et al. 2001 [16]

P

NA

1,114

IVF/ICSI

16–20h

Modified from Tesaik and Greco, 1999

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

De Placido et al. 2002 [17]

R

NA

1,171

ICSI

16–20h

Combination of Sadowy, 1998, Scott and Smith, 1998, Tesarik and Greco, 1999, Scott, 2000, and Wittemer, 2000

Not

Not

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Zollner et al. 2002 [18]

P

33.4±4.1

1,119

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Number, juxtaposition and size of PN, number and alignment of NPBs

NA

Yes

Yes°°

NA

NA

NA

NA

Gianaroli et al. 2003 [19]

P

≥36

631

IVF/ICSI

16h

Gianaroli, 2003

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

Chen et al. 2003 [20]

P

 

368

IVF

18–21h

Modified from Scott, 2000

Not

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Nagy et al. 2003 [21]

P/R

25–40

912

ICSI

12–21h§

Size of PN, number and polarization of NPBs

Yes° (only in day 3)

Yes° (only in day 2)

NA

Yes#

Yes#

NA

NA

Scott et al. 2003 [22]

R

<43

3,882

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott, 2000

NA

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

NA

Lan et al. 2003 [23]

R

NA

1,894

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott, 2000

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Gámiz et al. 2003 [24]

P

NA

888

ICSI

16–18h

Size of PN, number, distribuiton and synchrony of NPBs

NA

Yes***

NA

NA

NA

NA

Yes***

Jaroudi et al. 2004 [25]

P

NA

131

IVF/ICSI

15–18h

Tesarik, 2000

Not

NA

NA

NA

Not

NA

NA

Kattera et al. 2004 [26]

P

35.4±3.6 (IVF) 35.1±3.4 (ICSI)

2,714

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

PN orientation

Yes

Yes

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Balaban 2004 [27]

R

NA

309

IVF/ICSI

17h

Modified from Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Payne et al. 2005 [28]

P

≤42

552

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott, 2000

Not

Not

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Edirisinghe et al. 2005 [29]

P

≥37

952

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Scott, 2000

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

NA

Yes

James et al. 2006 [30]

R

NA

3,333

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Combination of Sadowy, 1998 and Scott, 2000

Not

NA

NA

Not

Not

Not

NA

Sjöblom et al. 2006 [31]

R

NA

1,961

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

PBs, NPBs and PN

NA

NA

Yes

NA

NA

NA

NA

Chen et al. 2006 [32]

P

35.7±3.7 (IVF) 35.5±3.4 (ICSI)

1,186

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

PN, PBs and NPBs

NA

Yes

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Gianaroli et al. 2007 [33]

R

38.2±3.7 (IVF) 39.0±3.5 (ICSI)

2,535

ICSI

16h

Gianaroli, 2003

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

Arroyo et al. 2007 [34]

P

33.1±2.93 (IVF) <39 (ICSI)

569

IVF/ICSI

14–23h

Tesarik and Greco, 1999 / Scott, 2000

Yes

NA

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Guerif et al. 2007 [35]

P

NA

4,042

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

Modified from Tesarik and Greco, 1999

NA

NA

Not

NA

NA

NA

NA

Scott et al. 2007 [36]

P

<38

2,528

IVF/ICSI

17–18h

Scott, 2000

NA

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

Depa–Martynow et al. 2007 [37]

P

NA

787

IVF

16–18h

Scott, 2000

Yes

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Nicoli et al. 2007 [38]

R

23–41

1,032

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

Modified from Scott, 2000 and Gianaroli, 2003

Not

NA

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Álvarez et al. 2008 [39]

R

35.0±3.5

883

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

Tesarik and Greco, 1999

Yes

NA

NA

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

Liu et al. 2008 [40]

P

30.4±3.71 (IVF) 30.1±3.79 (ICSI)

2,836

IVF/ICSI

16–20h

Scott, 2000

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

Not

NA

NA

Qian et al. 2008 [41]

P

NA

973

IVF/ICSI

18–18h

Scott, 2000/Lan, 2003

Not

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Brezinova et al. 2009 [42]

R

<39

1,954

IVF/ICSI

16–20h

Modified from Tesarik and Greco, 1999

NA

NA

NA

Not

Not

NA

NA

Maille et al. 2009 [43]

P

40.1±1.3 (IVF) 27.1±1.4 (ICSI)

301

ICSI

16–18h

Gianaroli, 2003

Not

Yes **

NA

Yes

Yes **

NA

NA

Zamora et al. 2010 [44]

P

NA

2,105

IVF/ICSI

16–18h

PN size, NPBs and PBs

NA

Yesç

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Weitzman et al. 2010 [45]

P

<36

852

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

Tesarik and Greco/Scott, 2000

NA

NA

NA

Not

NA

NA

NA

Nicoli et al. 2010 [46]

R

35.9±4.0

1,078

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

Gianaroli, 2003

Not

Not

NA

NA

Not

Not

NA

Bar–Yoseph et al. 2011 [47]

R

31.1±5.0

1,516

IVF/ICSI

17–18h

Scott, 2000

NA

NA

NA

Not

NA

NA

NA

Aydin et al. 2011 [48]

P

29.8±3.5

487

ICSI

16–18h

Modifed from Tesarik and Greco, 1999/Scott, 2000

NA

Not

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Nicoli et al. 2013 [49]

R

36.6±3.9

755

IVF/ICSI

18–20h

Gianaroli, 2003

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not

Not

NA

  1. P: prospective; R: retrospective; IVF: in vitro fertilization; ICSI: intracytoplasmic spem injection; PN: pronuclei; PBs: polar bodies; NPBs: nucleolar precursor bodies; TOPI: time of observation post–insemination; Yes: statistically significant correlation; Not: No correlation or correlation not statistically significant; NA: not available.
  2. *: only for zygotes classified according to Scott and Smith, 1998; °°: only in ICSI cycles; °: only for polarization, and not for number of NPBs §: first observation 12–14 h post–ICSI, second observation 16–18 h post ICSI (retrospective) and third observation ≥ 20 h post ICSI (prospective); #: only in combination with embryo morphology evaluation; ***: only in patients < 37 years old; **: only in patients < 30 years old; ç: only for NPBs.