Table 6 Comparison of our results with previous studies
Study | No. | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | PPV(%) | NPV(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jacob et al.1990 | 143 | 85.4 | 96.6 | ||
Davies et al.1993 | 124 | 87.0 | 89.0 | ||
Tingulstad et al.1996 | 173 | 71.0 | 96.0 | 89 | 88 |
Tingulstad et al.1999 | 365 | 71.0 | 92.0 | 69 | 92 |
Morgante et al.1999 | 124 | 58.0 | 95.0 | 78 | 87 |
Manjunath et al2001 | 152 | 73.0 | 91.0 | 93 | 67 |
Orres et al. 2002 | 154 | 73.0 | 86.0 | ||
Ma et al. 2003 | 140 | 87.3 | 84.4 | 82 | 89 |
Andersen et al.2003 | 180 | 70.6 | 87.7 | 66 | 90 |
Ulusoy et al. 2006 | 236 | 71.7 | 80.5 | 67 | 84 |
Our study(RMI = 236) | 126 | 72.5 | 98.2 | 98.1 | 74.7 |