Skip to main content

Table 1 A comparison of senescence-associated parameters in pEOCs senesced upon their exposure to carboplatin (CPT) and paclitaxel (PCT) in vitro and in vivo

From: Pro-cancerogenic effects of spontaneous and drug-induced senescence of ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo: a comparative analysis

Parameter (unit)

 n

CPT + PCT in vitro

CPT + PCT in vivo

 

Young

Senescent

Young

Senescent

SA-β-Gal( +)/γ-H2A.X( +) cells (%)

8

1 ± 1

73 ± 12

17 ± 2**

69 ± 10

p16-positive cells (%)

6

4 ± 2

62 ± 9

24 ± 6*

69 ± 7

p21-positive cells (%)

6

6 ± 1

42 ± 8

11 ± 8

54 ± 6

p53-positive cells (%)

6

4 ± 3

50 ± 6

7 ± 3

43 ± 5

telomere length (kbp)

6

4.4 ± 0.2

4.2 ± 0.1

4.4 ± 0.1

4.3 ± 0.1

telomerase activity (TPG)

6

2.1 ± 0.3

1.9 ± 0.3

1.8 ± 0.1

1.9 ± 0.2

γ-H2A.X-telomere colocalization (%)

10

6 ± 2

8 ± 4

6 ± 3

7 ± 1

G1 phase cells (%)

7

62 ± 4

48 ± 6

54 ± 8

41 ± 6

S phase cells (%)

7

21 ± 6

3 ± 5

19 ± 7

6 ± 1

G2/M phase cells (%)

7

17 ± 6

49 ± 1

27 ± 4

53 ± 6

subG1 cells (%)

6

0.8 ± 0.4

2.8 ± 3.4

1.5 ± 1.3

2.8 ± 1.2

  1. Note that “Young” cells from CPT + PCT in vitro group were not treated with drugs neither in vitro nor in vivo. Experiments were performed using pEOC cultures obtained from different patients. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM
  2. TPG Total Product Generated
  3. *P < 0.05 vs. in vitro; **—P < 0.01 vs. in vitro