Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality of evidence according to GRADE approach

From: Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid on metabolic status in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

 

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

n-3 PUFA

control

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

BW

 

6

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

very seriousa,b

none

185

186

-

MD 1.49 lower

(4.12 lower to 1.14 higher)

Low

NOT IMPORTANT

BMI

 

10

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

376

380

-

MD 0.56 lower

(1.11 lower to 0.01 lower)

High

NOT IMPORTANT

WC

 

3

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousa

none

112

114

-

MD 2.76 lower

(3.82 lower to 1.69 lower)

Moderate

NOT IMPORTANT

FPG

 

6

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

seriousa

none

176

179

-

MD 3.91 lower

(5.69 lower to 2.13 lower)

Moderate

IMPORTANT

FINS

 

6

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

230

233

-

MD 2.45 lower

(3.19 lower to 1.71 lower)

High

IMPORTANT

HOMA-IR

 

6

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

not serious

publication bias strongly suspectedc

230

233

-

MD 0.45 lower

(0.8 lower to 0.11 lower)

Low

IMPORTANT

QUICKI

 

3

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

seriousa

publication bias strongly suspectedc

91

91

-

MD 0.01 higher

(0.01 higher to 0.02 higher)

Very low

IMPORTANT

Adiponectin

 

3

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

seriousa

publication bias strongly suspectedc

166

168

-

MD 1.46 higher

(1.12 higher to 1.8 higher)

Very low

IMPORTANT

TG

 

7

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

273

277

-

MD 9.33 lower

(10.56 lower to 8.1 lower)

High

IMPORTANT

TC

 

7

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

not serious

publication bias strongly suspectedc

273

277

-

MD 12.32 lower

(19.15 lower to 5.5 lower)

Low

IMPORTANT

HDL-C

             
 

7

randomised trials

seriousc

seriousd

not serious

seriousb

publication bias strongly suspectedc

273

277

-

MD 2.1 higher

(0.29 lower to 4.5 higher)

Very low

IMPORTANT

LDL-C

 

7

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

not serious

publication bias strongly suspectedc

273

277

-

MD 10.53 lower

(19.31 lower to 1.75 lower)

Low

IMPORTANT

VLDL-C

 

3

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

very seriousa,b

none

91

91

-

MD 2.33 lower

(5.9 lower to 1.23 higher)

Low

IMPORTANT

hs-CRP

 

6

randomised trials

seriousc

not serious

not serious

very seriousa,b

publication bias strongly suspectedc

159

161

-

MD 0.56 lower

(1.19 lower to 0.07 higher)

Very low

IMPORTANT

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, BW body weight, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance, hs-CRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, QUICK quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, VLDL-C very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  2. aTotal sample size is less than optimal information size
  3. bEffect size confidence intervals were too large
  4. cPublication bias may exist; d. There is methodological heterogeneity