Comparison of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count in the prediction of ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Characteristics of the studies included of AFC for predicting ovarian response

Author	Region	Definition of ovarian response	TP	FP	FN	TN	Cut-off
Poor response
Fabregues et al. 2018 [25]	Spain	≤ 3 oocytes	40	61	10	326	NS
Ashrafi et al. 2017 [20]	Iran	≤ 4 oocytes	100	116	22	312	8
Neves et al. 2020 [48]	Belgium^a	≤ 3 oocytes	42	32	8	137	6
Islam et al. 2016 [31]	Egypt	≤ 3 oocytes	13	34	2	51	7
Palhares et al. 2018 [17]	Brazil	≤ 3 oocytes	36	40	9	56	8
Frattarelli et al. 2003 [28]	USA	< 3 oocytes	7	10	16	234	4
Jayaprakasan et al. 2010 [34]	UK	≤ 3 oocytes	14	14	1	106	10
Tolikas et al. 2011 [18]	Greece	< 4 oocytes	21	12	8	49	5
Mutlu et al. 2013 [10]	Turkey	< 4 oocytes	45	13	4	130	6
Jayaprakasan et al. 2007 [35]	UK	< 4 follicles	5	4	0	91	6
McIlveen et al. 2007 [43]	UK	≤ 4 oocytes	6	14	7	57	5
Bancsi et al. 2004 [23]	Netherlands	< 4 oocytes	22	10	14	74	4
Yong et al. 2003 [56]	UK	< 3 oocytes	1	1	7	37	4
Järvelä et al. 2003 [32]	Canada	< 5 follicles	10	5	2	28	4
Soldevila et al. 2007 [52]	Spain	≤ 5 follicles	75	52	46	154	8
High response
Izhar et al. 2021 [32]	Pakistan	NS	51	6	3	216	18
Tan et al. 2021 [53]	China	> 15 oocytes	145	19	22	150	18
Ashrafi et al. 2017 [20]	Iran	≥ 15 oocytes	87	116	32	315	15
Neves et al. 2020 [48]	Belgium^a	≤ 3 oocytes	19	46	5	149	10
Eldar-Geva et al. 2005 [24]	Israel	> 20 oocytes	16	26	1	13	14
Aflatoonian et al. 2009 [19]	Iran	> 15oocytes	40	8	5	90	16

NS Not stated, TP True positive, FP False positive, FN False negative, TN True negative
^aRegion included Belgium, Spain, Germany, Italy

ISSN: 1757-2215