Open Access

Association between intrafollicular concentration of benzene and outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles: a pilot study

  • Carlo Alviggi1,
  • Rossella Guadagni2,
  • Alessandro Conforti1Email author,
  • Giuseppe Coppola1,
  • Silvia Picarelli1,
  • Pasquale De Rosa1,
  • Roberta Vallone1,
  • Ida Strina1,
  • Tiziana Pagano1,
  • Antonio Mollo1,
  • Antonio Acampora2 and
  • Giuseppe De Placido1
Journal of Ovarian Research20147:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-7-67

Received: 6 January 2014

Accepted: 28 May 2014

Published: 18 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Several studies have shown that exposure to benzene is associated to menstrual disorders, miscarriages and other disorders of the reproductive system. We performed an observational prospective pilot study to evaluate if levels of benzene in follicular fluid were correlated with response to controlled ovarian stimulation.

Method

Thirty-four normogonadotrophic women undergoing IVF were enrolled. Intra-follicular benzene levels were evaluated by chromatography/mass spectrometry. Based on median benzene level, we divided the study population in two groups: Group A with a “low” intra-follicular benzene concentration (n = 19, benzene <0.54 ng/mL) and Group B with a “high” intra-follicular benzene concentration (n = 15, benzene ≥ 0.54 ng/mL). The ovarian response to gonadotrophins and the outcome of IVF were analyzed in the two groups.

Results

The two groups did not differ in terms of demographic or anthropometric characteristics. Group B had significantly higher basal FSH levels, lower estradiol peak concentration, and fewer oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred (p < 0.05). Number of gonadotrophin vials, length of controlled ovarian stimulation and ongoing pregnancy rate were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ovarian response to endogenous and exogenous gonadotrophins appeared to be influenced by intra-follicular benzene levels.

Keywords

Benzene Pollution Infertility IVF Poor responders FSH

Background

Several lines of evidence suggest that exposure to environmental contaminants is involved in the pathobiology of adverse reproductive health effects, including decreased semen quality, sub-fertility, reduced fetal growth and preterm birth [16]. Developmental abnormalities of the male reproductive tract were also reported [7]. Among environmental contaminants, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), trichloro-bis-chlorophenyl-ethane (DDT) and benzene seem to play a relevant role in adverse reproductive health effects [8].

Benzene is a volatile, colorless, highly flammable liquid [9]. Today, most benzene (98%) is commercially derived from petrochemical and petroleum-refining industries. Benzene is a by-product of such combustion processes as forest fires and the burning of wood, garbage, organic wastes and cigarettes [1013]. Benzene is ubiquitous in the environment, having been measured in air, water, and human biological samples [1317].

The major sources of benzene exposure are tobacco smoke, automobile service stations, exhaust from motor vehicles and industrial emissions. About half the exposure to benzene in the United States results from smoking tobacco or from exposure to tobacco smoke [9]. The average smoker (32 cigarettes per day) takes in about 1.8 mg of benzene per day. This amount is about 10 times the average daily intake of benzene by non-smokers [9].

Epidemiologic studies have shown that occupational exposure to high concentrations of benzene negatively affects reproduction. Specifically, benzene exposure in the workplace was associated with high rates of functional disturbances of the menstrual cycle [18], premature interruptions of pregnancy [19, 20] and reduction in birth weight and head circumference during pregnancy and at birth [21].

Notwithstanding the evidence linking benzene exposure to negative reproductive health effects, the pathogenesis of adverse reproductive outcomes and benzene exposure has not yet been explored. In this context, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a good in vivo model with which to evaluate directly the effects exerted by benzene on each step of the reproductive process.

The aim of this pilot study was to preliminarily evaluate the relationship between concentrations of benzene in the follicular fluid (FF) and the outcome of IVF/ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) cycles.

Methods

Thirty-four consecutive women attending the IVF program at the Reproductive Medicine Unit of the University of Naples “Federico II” were prospectively enrolled from November 2011 to January 2012. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for the present study due to the observational design. No adjunctive procedure has been introduced and all the IVF/ICSI cycles were performed according to routine clinical practice.

A comprehensive written consent form was signed by all participants before enrolment. They also completed a short questionnaire regarding their occupation, place of residence, smoking and driving habits. Only normogonadotrophic patients aged < 38 years with menstrual cycles ranging from 24 to 35 days (intra-individual variability ± 3 days), body mass index (BMI) > 20 and < 28.0 kg/m2 and hysteroscopic evidence of a normal uterine cavity within the last 6 months were included.

Women with diabetes mellitus, hypopituitarism, hyperprolactinemia, luteal insufficiency, polycystic ovarian syndrome [22], polycystic ovaries, endometriosis, dysthyroidism, chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders, chromosomal abnormalities or genetic diseases were excluded.

All patients underwent a gonadotrophin releasing hormone-agonist (GnRH-a) long down-regulation protocol with the administration of GnRH-a triptorelin, at the daily dose of 0.1 mg s.c., from the mid-luteal phase for 12–20 days (Decapeptyl 0.1 mg; Ipsen S.p.A., Milan, Italy). Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) (Gonal F, Merck Serono S.p.A., Bari, Italy), using an individualized dose of between 150 IU and 225 IU s.c. daily according to baseline age, BMI and FSH levels. Ovarian response was monitored by ultrasound examination starting on day 5 of stimulation and the dose of recombinant FSH was adjusted if necessary. The ovulatory dose of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), 10,000 IU (Gonasi HP; IBSA Farmaceutici Italia Srl, Lodi, Italy) was administered when at least three follicles reached a mean diameter of 17 mm. Oocytes were retrieved 35 h after HCG prescription.

Oocytes were washed immediately after retrieval in in vitro fertilisation medium (IVF Medicult, Copenhagen, Denmark) and cultured before IVF/ICSI. Fertilisation was checked 16–20 h after insemination, which was confirmed by the presence of two pronuclei. Zygotes were then washed and transferred to fresh media for embryo culture. No embryo selection was performed before transfer. Therefore, only embryos obtained after all IVF procedures were implanted. According to Italian legislation our policy was to limit the number of oocytes to be fertilised. Given that young and eumenorrohoic women (good prognosis) were enrolled, 3 oocytes were fertilised in all of them with no case of embryo freezing.

Luteal phase support was given vaginally in the form of 400 mg micronized progesterone (Prometrium; Rottapharm S.p.A., Milan, Italy) twice daily, starting on the day after oocyte retrieval and continuing until the day of the pregnancy test (i.e. day 12 after embryo transfer). The viability of pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound scan at 10 weeks.

Benzene chromatographic/spectrometric assay

After isolation of oocytes, FF was pooled and stored (−80°C) until analysis. The concentration of benzene in FF samples was measured as follows. Samples were thawed at room temperature and the whole sample (ranging from 500 μl to 2 ml) was transferred into 10 ml vials containing 1 g NaCl. Vials were sealed with silicone/teflon-lined septa, and 50 μl of a 29.6 ng/ml hexadeuterated benzene (C6D6, internal standard) aqueous solution was added to each sample to obtain a constant internal standard amount of 1.48 ng. Hexadeuterated benzene, sodium chloride, 10 ml vials and silicone/teflon lined (0.1-mm thick coating) septa, “superior standard”, were from Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Solid phase microextraction (SPME) fibers, (fused-silica fibers 10 mm long, coated with an 85-μm-thick layer of carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane) and fiber holders were from Supelco (Bellafonte, PA, USA). Samples were analyzed with a head space/solid phase microextraction (HS/SPME) method and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We used the Gas Chromatograph-Single Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer “HRGC 8000 series/VOYAGER” (Fisons Instruments, Ipswich, UK), equipped with a split/splitless injector (0.75 mm i.d. inlet liner for SPME [Supelco, Bellafonte, PA, USA]) and a Zebron 624 capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., 1.40 μm thick film [Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA]). Briefly, vials were heated at 55°C and kept at this temperature for 30 min, to allow the volatile compounds to reach equilibrium between the gaseous and aqueous phases. Then the SPME device was inserted into the vial and the fiber was exposed to the headspace above the sample for 15 min. Analytes were thermally desorbed by inserting fibers into the gas chromatography (GC) injector at 250°C. The GC oven temperature was kept at 50°C for 2 min, then the temperature was increased to 90°C at 6°C/min and maintained at 90°C for 1 min. Helium (purity: 99.5%) was used as carrier gas, at 1 ml/min constant flow. The mass spectrometry (MS) detector (source temperature, 200°C) was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode. The acquired masses were 51.0, 77.0 and 78.0 m/z for benzene, and 82.2, 84.2 m/z for the internal standard.

Given the small amount of FF samples available, we did not use the standard addition approach generally adopted to quantify benzene in biological matrices. Rather we determined benzene concentration ([B]s) by normalizing the benzene chromatographic peak area (AreaBS) with respect to the internal standard area (AreaIS) and with respect to the volume (V) of each sample. The following equation was used: [B]s = [(AreaBS 1.48 ng)/AreaIS]/V.

Statistical analysis

The primary study endpoint of this pilot study was the change in the number oocytes retrieved. Secondary endpoints were the mean number of gonadotrophin vials used, the duration of COS, the mean number of embryos transferred and the ongoing pregnancy rate. The population study sample was determined arbitrarily; we were unable to make a pre-study sample size calculation because of the lack of similar studies on this topic.

Results were analyzed using the statistical package SPSS 12.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., USA). We used the D’Agostino-Pearson normality test to quantify the distribution of all continuous variables. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of stimulation protocols on continuous variables. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess inter-group differences in relation to non-parametric continuous variables and the χ2 test to compare discontinuous data. We assessed the relationship between continuous variables and intra-follicular levels of benzene with a linear correlation (Pearson’s correlation), whereas we used Spearman’s coefficient to determine the relationship between intra-follicular levels of benzene and non continuous variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The demographic and hormonal characteristics and the indications for IVF/ICSI of the study population are reported in Table 1. Linear regression analysis showed that the intra-follicular level of benzene was significantly and positively correlated with baseline FSH level (r = 0.38; p = 0.03). Furthermore, it was significantly and negatively correlated with each of the following variables: average number of oocytes retrieved (r = −0.43; p = 0.010) and average number of embryos transferred (r = −0.37; p = 0.03). There was no correlation between benzene levels and the following variables: baseline E2 (17β-estradiol) levels (p = 0.38), baseline LH (luteinizing hormone) levels (p = 0.16), E2 peak levels (p = 0.086), number of exogenous gonadotrophin vials used (p = 0.57) and number of days of stimulation (p = 0.86).
Table 1

The main indications, basal characteristics and the IVF/ICSI outcome of study population

 

Group A (n = 19)

Group B (n = 15)

p value

Indications for IVF/ICSI

   

Male factor

7 (36.8%)

10 (66.6%)

0.16

Severe OAT

6

8

 

Mild OAT

1

2

Female factor

10 (52.6%)

5 (33.3%)

0.31

Tubal factor

7

4

 

Repeated abortions

1

0

Others female factors

2

1

Idiopathic factor

2 (10.5%)

0

0.49

Basal characteristics

   

Age (years)

31 ± 4.7

32 ± 4.8

0.74

BMI (kg/m2)

24.0 ± 3.5

25.3 ± 2.2

0.85

Intra-follicular benzene (ng/mL)

0.15 ± 0.2

1.5 ± 1.25

0.001

Baseline FSH (IU/L)

5.8 ± 1.1

11.3 ± 4.2

0.003

Baseline LH (IU/L)

3.9 ± 1.6

8.2 ± 2.5

0.07

IVF/ICSI outcome

   

Baseline E2 (pg/mL)

38.9 ± 16.1

38.4 ± 18.3

0.55

E2 peak (pg/mL)

1836.65 ± 661.9

1328.8 ± 493.0

0.008

Days of stimulation

13.2 ± 2.7

13.4 ± 2.6

0.75

Gonadotrophin vials

33.3 ± 15.2

32.65 ± 13.8

0.59

Oocytes retrieved

7.4 ± 2.5

6.6 ± 2.85

0.01

Embryos transferred

2.6 ± 0.4

2.3 ± 0.6

0.04

Ongoing pregnancy rate

4 (21%)

4 (28%)

0.89

Data reported as mean ± SD or percentage [n (%)].

BMI, body mass index, FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone, E2, 17β estradiol, OAT, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.

To evaluate the effect of benzene, we divided the study population into two groups using the median benzene concentration (0.54 ng/mL) as cut-off value. Group A (n = 19) had levels of intra-follicular benzene < 0.54 ng/mL and Group B (n = 15) levels ≥0.54 ng/mL (data not shown). Demographic and anthropometric characteristics did not differ between the two groups (Table 1). No difference regarding main indications to IVF/ICSI was found between groups (data not shown).

There was no statistical difference in terms of baseline LH, baseline E2, number of gonadotrophin vials used, and number of days of stimulation between the two groups.

On the contrary, baseline FSH levels were higher in group B than in group A (11.3 ± 4. 2 versus 5.8 ± 1.1; p = 0.003), and the E2 peak was significantly lower in group B (1328.8 ± 493.0 versus 1836.65 ± 661.9; p = 0.008).

The number of oocytes retrieved (6.61 ± 2.85 versus 7.4 ± 2.5; p = 0.01) were lower in group B than in group A. Although all women were considered eligible for embryo transfer, the number of embryos transferred was higher in group A, i.e., the group with a low intrafollicular benzene concentration (2.3 ± 0.6 versus 2.6 ± 0.4; p = 0.04).

Finally, the ongoing pregnancy rate was comparable in the two groups (Table 1). Specifically, we obtained four singleton pregnancies in group A, and three singleton pregnancies and one twin pregnancy in group B.

Based on the replies to the questionnaire, we looked for variables that might account for the differences in the intra-follicular benzene concentration between the two groups. There was no significant difference in terms of place of residence and occupational risk of benzene exposure (data not shown). However, there was a difference, albeit not significant, regarding cigarette smoking (26.3% in group A versus 40.0% in group B) and driving habits (68.4% in group A and 46.65% in group B).

Discussion

This study provides the first evidence that high concentrations of benzene in the ovary can impact negatively on gonadal function and on the ovarian response to endogenous and exogenous gonadotrophin. In particular, a significant correlation was found between intra-follicular levels of benzene and FSH baseline. This correlation was confirmed when the study population was divided into two groups based on intra-follicular levels of benzene; indeed, baseline FSH concentration was significantly higher in patients with higher intra-follicular benzene values (Group B). Also baseline LH level was higher in group B, but the difference was not significant, probably due to the population size.

Consistent with these observations, we also demonstrate that benzene adversely affects ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophin during IVF procedures. Indeed, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between the intra-follicular levels of benzene and the average number of oocytes recovered and embryos implanted. This observation was confirmed by the results obtained in the two groups: peak estradiol, average number of oocytes recovered and average number of embryos implanted were significantly higher in group A, which was characterized by low levels of benzene. Nevertheless, the number of gonadotropin vials and the average duration of stimulation did not differ between the two groups. These findings support the hypothesis that benzene could lead to ovarian resistance to exogenous gonadotrophin. Even though a slower and lower response to r-hFSH occurred in the high benzene group, oocyte retrieval was apparently satisfactory and the daily dose of exogenous gonadotrophin was not increased in the “high” benzene group. A possible explanation of this discrepancy is that benzene exerted local toxicity on follicles thereby affecting the number observed during scan monitoring and, to a greater extent, their subsequent maturation process. This discrepant effect could also be related to the characteristics of the study population and of course to the small number of patients enrolled in the study. According to our findings, it seems that the normal ovarian reserve probably counteracted the detrimental effects of benzene, leading to a sort of “hypo-response” rather than the classical “poor ovarian response” [23]. However, given the low number of patients evaluated, this hypothesis needs to be verified in larger trials.

Our data are in accordance with observational studies conducted in a business environment which revealed that exposure to benzene can negatively affect reproduction function [2426].

However, using the model of IVF/ICSI we show, for the first time, that high intra-ovarian levels of benzene are associated with hypo-sensitivity of follicles to gonadotrophin stimulation. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon is not clear. We may speculate that ovarian resistance results from an alteration of transductional efficiency of FSH receptor or that benzene exerts a degenerative effect on follicles, thereby reducing the follicular reserve.

If our findings are confirmed, the next step would be to evaluate the ovarian reserve in patients with high intra-ovarian levels of benzene by measuring circulating levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and by counting the number antral follicles in early follicular phase using trans-vaginal standard and three dimension ultrasound [27, 28]. In addition, it would be interesting to evaluate older patients to determine whether age affects benzene toxicity. Unfortunately, we were unable to perform this analysis because of the small subgroup of cases above the age of 35 years old.

Although the present study provides information only about oocyte quantity during IVF, it could be argued that altered sensitivity to FSH is associated with reduced oocyte quality, which in turn could affect the chances of pregnancy and the risk of abortion [29]. This issue should be addressed in a prospective trial performed in a larger IVF study population, with the pregnancy rate as primary endpoint.

The subjects enrolled in this study completed a questionnaire designed to explore the link between life-style and concentration of benzene in the ovary. Currently, there is no standardized questionnaire that reliably assesses benzene assumption and driving habits. The reliability of self-reports of smoking is often questioned due to the underestimation of the smoking status recorded especially in communities where this habit is perceived as being particularly improper [30]. Despite this relevant bias and a sample size too low to detect a statistically significant correlation, our data suggest that high intra-follicular levels of benzene are related to an at-risk life-style, namely, cigarette smoking.

The aim of our study was to investigate the direct effect of follicular benzene on the outcome of COS. We did not evaluate serum levels of the hydrocarbon molecule at that stage. Should our data be confirmed, the next step would be to investigate the relationship between serum and follicular concentration of benzene. This information could shed light on the potential role of serum levels of benzene in predicting ovarian response.

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this study, although preliminary, support the existence of a link between exposure to benzene and reduced reproductive capacity, and provide evidence of follicular hyposensitivity to FSH in women with high gonadal concentrations of the molecule. The next step would be to define the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying resistance to endogenous gonadotrophin and the reduced ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophin. Comparative analysis carried out in large populations using the in vitro fertilization model would enable an accurate assessment of the effects of benzene on each stage of the reproductive process.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

COS: 

Controlled ovarian stimulation

DDT: 

Trichloro-bis-chlorophenyl-ethane

E2

17β-estradiol

FF: 

Follicular fluid

FSH: 

Follicle stimulating hormone

GC: 

Gas chromatography

GC-MS: 

Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

GnRH-a: 

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone-agonist

HCB: 

Hexachlorobenzene

HCG: 

Human chorionic gonadotrophin

HS/SPME: 

Head space/solid phase microextraction

ICSI: 

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

IVF: 

In vitro fertilization

LH: 

Luteinizing hormone

MS: 

Mass spectrometry

OpU: 

Ovum pick-up

PCB: 

Polychlorinated biphenyls

SPME: 

Solid phase microextraction

V: 

Volume

3D: 

Three dimension.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jean Ann Gilder (Scientific Communication srl., Naples, Italy) for her contribution to the revision and editing of this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Scienze Riproduttive ed Odontostomatologiche, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’
(2)
Dipartimento Medicina Pubblica e della Sicurezza Sociale, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’

References

  1. Feichtinger W: Environmental factors and fertility. Hum Reprod 1991, 6: 1170–1175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Richardson MC, Guo M, Fauser BC, Macklon NS: Environmental and developmental origins of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod Update 2013. Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  3. De Celis R, Pedrón-Nuevo N, Feria-Velasco A: Toxicology of male reproduction in animals and humans. Arch Androl 1996, 37: 201–218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. De Celis R, Feria-Velasco A, González-Unzaga M, Torres-Calleja J, Pedrón-Nuevo N: Semen quality of workers occupationally exposed to hydrocarbons. Fertil Steril 2000, 73: 221–228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Benes I, Lenicek J, Sram R: The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect 2000, 108: 1159–1164.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera F: Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116: 658–665.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rocheleau CM, Romitti PA, Dennis LK: Pesticides and hypospadias: a metanalysis. J Pediatr Urol 2009, 5: 17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang S, Chen H, Wang X: Studies on relationship between exposure to low concentration of mixed benzene and lower quality of semen and very early fetal loss. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000, 34: 271–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. Toxicological profile for benzene (update) 2007. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp3.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. IARC: Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Some industrial chemicals and dyestuffs, 29. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1982:93–148.Google Scholar
  11. Fishbein L: An overview of environmental and toxicological aspects of aromatic hydrocarbons. I. Benzene. Sci Total Environ 1984, 40: 189–218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wester RC, Maibach HI, Gruenke LD, Craig JC: Benzene levels in ambient air and breath of smokers and nonsmokers in urban and pristine environments. J Toxicol Environ Health 1986, 18: 567–573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hattemer-Frey HA, Travis CC, Land ML: Benzene: environmental partitioning and human exposure. Environ Res 1990, 53: 221–232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Antoine SR, De Leon IR, O’Dell-Smith RM: Environmentally significant volatile organic pollutants in human blood. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1986, 36: 364–371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Wallace L, Pellizzari E, Leaderer B, Zelon H, Sheldon L: Emissions of volatile organic compounds from building materials and consumer products. Atmos Environ 1987, 21: 385–393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wallace L: Environmental exposure to benzene: an update. Environ Health Perspect 1996,104(Suppl 6):1129–1136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cho SI, Damokosh AI, Ryan LM, Chen D, Hu YA, Smith TJ, Christiani DC, Xu X: Effects of exposure to organic solvents on menstrual cycle length. J Occup Environ Med 2001, 43: 567–575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang XY: Influence on benzene and toluene to reproductive function of female workers in leather shoe making industry. Chin J Prev Med 1991, 25: 89–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu X, Cho SI, Sammel M, You L, Cui S, Huang Y, Ma G, Padungtod C, Pothier L, Niu T, Christiani D, Smith T, Ryan L, Wang L: Association of petrochemical exposure with spontaneous abortion. Occup Environ Med 1998, 55: 31–36.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Slama R, Thiebaugeorges O, Goua V, Aussel L, Sacco P, Bohet A, Forhan A, Ducot B, Annesi-Maesano I, Heinrich J, Magnin G, Schweitzer M, Kaminski M, Charles MA, EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group: Maternal personal exposure to airborne benzene and intrauterine growth. Environ Health Perspect 2009, 117: 1313–1321.Google Scholar
  22. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group: Revised 2003: consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risk related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004, 19: 41–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition: ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011, 26: 1616–1624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith EM, Hammonds-Ehlers M, Clark MK, Kirchner HL, Fuortes L: Occupational exposures and risk of female infertility. J Occup Environ Med 1997, 39: 138–147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Burguet A, Agnani G: Smoking, fertility and very preterm birth. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003,32(1 Suppl):9–16.Google Scholar
  26. Waylen AL, Metwally M, Jones GL, Wilkinson AJ, Ledger WL: Effects of cigarette smoking upon clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2009, 15: 31–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, Stabile G, Volpe A: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 2010, 16: 113–130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Ezcurra D: Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012, 6: 10–19.Google Scholar
  29. Mukhametova IM, Vozovaya MA: Reproductive power and the incidence of gynecological disorders in female workers exposed to the combined effect of benzene and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Gig Tr Prof Zabol 1972, 16: 6–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Connor Gorber S, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M: The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tob Res 2009, 11: 12–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Alviggi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement