Skip to main content
Download PDF

Serum exosomal microRNA-34a as a potential biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer

Journal of Ovarian Research volume 13, Article number: 47 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women, and thus an accurate diagnosis of the predisposition and its early detection is necessary. The aims of this study were to determine whether serum exosomal microRNA-34a (miR-34a) in ovarian cancer could be used as a potential biomarker.

Methods

Exosomes from OC patients’ serum were collected, and exosomal miRNAs were extracted. The relative expression of miR-34a was calculated from 58 OC samples by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Serum exosomal miR-34a levels were significantly increased in early-stage OC patients compared with advanced-stage patients. Its levels were significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastasis than in those with no lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, its levels in the recurrence group were significantly lower than those in the recurrence-free group.

Conclusions

Serum exosomal miR-34a could be a potential biomarker for improving the diagnostic efficiency of OC.

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women and the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. The keystone for improving health outcomes is the early detection and accurate diagnosis of the disease. Despite the emergence of novel therapies such as antiangiogenics in recent years, little improvement in survival has been achieved. At present, the standard therapy for ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum-based compounds. However, despite these treatments, the 5-year overall survival rates for OC are reported to be 46.0% for stage III and 25.1% for stage IV [1]. A poor prognosis can be expected due to the asymptomatic nature of this disease [2]. Such outcomes highlight the urgency to establish early diagnostic methods for OC with novel, more effective, and less invasive approaches. One feasible approach for diagnosing ovarian cancer at an early stage may involve the identification of useful and non-invasive potential biomarkers.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) consist of 18–25 nucleotides and are highly conserved. It is well-known that mature miRNAs regulate gene expression by binding to complementary nucleotide sequences in 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) [3]. Increasing numbers of advanced studies reveal important roles of miRNAs in various tumors, where they regulate several processes, such as cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis [4, 5].

Several studies have shown that miR-34a is usually downregulated and suppresses tumor migration and invasion in various tumors, and inhibits c-Met expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells [6]. Decreased expression of miR-34a and increased expression of HDAC1 are closely related to OC cell development, thus miR-34a may function as a tumor repressor by directly targeting and modulating HDAC1 expression in OC cells.

To explain the stability of circulating RNAs, it was suggested that extracellular RNAs are included within lipoprotein vesicles. Indeed, exogenous RNAs added to plasma or blood are immediately degraded, whereas endogenous plasma RNAs are stable for hours under the same conditions [7]. Furthermore, treatment with some detergents results in the immediate degradation of plasma extracellular RNAs, apparently due to the disruption of the lipid vesicles. These findings clearly indicate that extracellular RNAs are packaged in secretory particles such as apoptotic bodies or exosomes, leaving them protected from ubiquitous ribonucleases.

Exosomes have been postulated to have an important role in cell–cell communication and appear to affect target cells either by stimulating them directly through ligands expressed on the cell or by transferring molecules between cells. Ratajczak et al. [8] demonstrated the presence of exosomal RNA and provided evidence for the horizontal transfer of genetic information between cells. Since there is a possibility that exosomes of detected in plasma contain tumor cell-specific miRNA, their use as potential biomarkers of disease progression might be a reasonable option. There have been some reports at the miRNA level of exosomes isolated from OC tissue or ascites [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, to our knowledge, there are few reports at the miRNA level of exosomes isolated from the plasma of OC patients [16,17,18,19].

The present study investigated miRNA levels in exosomes isolated from the plasma of OC patients with different clinical presentations upon diagnosis, and retrospectively evaluated the relationship between these findings and disease outcome.

Materials and methods

Study populations

Blood samples were collected from 58 epithelial OC patients directly before surgery from 2013 to October 2017. The patients were treated according to the national guidelines at Osaka Medical College, Department of Gynecology, and histologically confirmed to be International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I–IV.

Blood collection and experiments were performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and were approved by the institution’s ethics committee. The experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written informed consent of each subject. Regarding blood processing, uniform management concerning the specific protocols was performed.

Isolation of total exosomes from plasma

Blood (10 ml) from OC patients was collected in a serum separator tube and processed within an hour. Separation of the serum was accomplished by centrifugation at 3000×g for 30 min to remove cells and cell debris. The cell-free serum samples were stored in aliquots at − 80 °C. The samples were then ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 240 min at 4 °C using a Beckman™ L-90 K ultracentrifuge (Brea, CA, USA), and then the pellets were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The exosome samples were stored at − 80 °C for later analysis.

Electron microscopy

Exosome pellets were resuspended in PBS, and the solution was dropped onto a carbon-coated copper grid with a mesh diameter of 2 nm for 2 min. The excess liquid was removed, and filter paper was used to drain the grid; a drop was negatively stained with phosphotungstic acid and loaded onto the grid for 5 min. The grid was then dried at room temperature. Finally, the samples were observed by transmission electron microscopy as previously described [20].

Western blotting analyses

The exosomal samples were plated onto six-well plates and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer; 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Lysates were separated by 5–20% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, followed by incubation with primary antibodies (CD63) and then incubation with the corresponding secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG. The proteins were visualized with an electrochemiluminescent system (PerkinElmer Life Science, Waltham, MA, USA).

Extraction of exosomal miRNAs

Total miRNAs were extracted from exosomes resuspended using the miRVana™ miRNA Isolation Kit (#AM1560; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of miR-34a from serum exosomal microRNA

MiRNA qRT-PCR was performed using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Total RNA was transcribed into cDNA using the TaqMan MiRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (#4366596; Applied Biosystems). Mature miR-34a was assayed using the TaqMan assay. To normalize the miRNA expression, RNU48 was used as an endogenous control for cellular miRNA. Each qRT-PCR assay was performed in triplicate, and the relative expression of miR-34a was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of miR-34a from ovarian cancer tissue or cell lines

To clarify miR-34a derived from ovarian cancer itself, we performed qRT-PCR of miR-34a from stage I ovarian cancer tissue samples (serous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinoma) and ovarian cancer cell lines (CAOV3, mucinous carcinoma; A2780, serous carcinoma; and RMG-1, clear cell carcinoma). Total miRNA was extracted from these tissue samples or cell lines following their resuspension using the miRVana™ miRNA Isolation Kit. Next, miRNA qRT-PCR was performed using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System as above.

Results

Verification of exosomes

We first confirmed whether exosomes were present in the isolated serum pellets by ultracentrifugation. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the clusters isolated from serum were round or oval membrane vesicles of predominantly 30 to 100 nm in size and were homogeneous in appearance (Fig. 1a), showing the characteristic appearance of exosomes. We next examined the expression of CD63, which is a specific exosomal protein marker [21]. The lysates of the isolated serum pellets were subjected to western blotting with anti-CD63 antibody. The compatible band for CD63 was detected as a specific band (Fig. 1b), suggesting the expression of CD63. These results suggest the successful extraction of serum exosomes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Verification of exosomes. a Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the clusters isolated from serum were round or oval membrane vesicles largely between 30 and 100 nm in size and were homogeneous in appearance. b Western blotting revealed that the specific exosomal protein marker CD63 was expressed in isolated serum exosomal pellets as specific bands

Full size image

Elevated serum exosomal miR-34a in early-stage OC patients

The relative expression of miR-34a in serum exosomes was calculated among the OC patients. A total of 58 sera samples were collected. The median follow-up time was 52 months (range, 38–74 months). The mean age of the OC patients was 57.9 years (range, 34–76 years). The patients’ clinical characteristics and information are listed in Table 1. Real-time relative quantification was performed to investigate serum exosomal miRNA. We first examined the difference in the relative serum exosomal expression of miR-34a between early-stage and advanced-stage OC patients. The relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a in early-stage OC patients (stage I to II) (n = 25) was significantly higher than that in advanced-stage OC patients (stage III to IV) (n = 28) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2a). Next, we examined the difference in the relative expression of serum exosomal miR-34a by lymph node metastasis. The relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a was significantly higher in patients with no lymph node metastasis (n = 37) compared with those with lymph node metastasis (n = 21) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). These data suggest that the relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a in early-stage OC patients appears to be higher than that in advanced-stage OC patients.

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

a The relative expression of miR-34a in early-stage OC patients (stage I or II) was significantly higher than that in advanced-stage patients (stage III or IV). b The serum exosomal miR-34a level was significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastasis than in those with no lymph node metastasis

Full size image

Association of serum exosomal miR-34a level and cancer recurrence

We also investigated whether circulating levels of exosomal miR-34a were related to recurrence in OC patients. The relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a was compared between the group with recurrence within 3 years of primary surgery (n = 21) and the group that remained recurrence-free for 3 years (n = 37). The relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a in the recurrence-free group was significantly higher than that in the recurrence group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relative level of miR-34a in the recurrence-free group was significantly higher than that in the recurrence group

Full size image

Differences in serum exosomal miR-34a profile by stage and histological type

We next examined whether the profile of serum exosomal miR-34a differed among histological types (serous, clear-cell, endometrioid, and mucinous carcinoma). In serous carcinoma (n = 22), the relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a was not significantly different between the early-stage OC group (n = 5) and advanced-stage OC group (n = 17) (P = 0.427) (Fig. 4a). In contrast, in non-serous carcinoma (n = 30), the relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a in the early-stage group (n = 21) was significantly higher than that in the advanced-stage group (n = 9) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, in the cases of clear cell carcinoma (n = 15), the relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a in the early-stage group (n = 10) was significantly higher than that in the advanced-stage group (n = 5) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a In serous carcinoma, the relative level of miR-34a showed no significant difference between the early-stage OC group and the advanced-stage OC group. b In non-serous carcinoma, the relative level of miR-34a in the early-stage OC group was significantly higher than that in the advanced-stage OC group. c In clear cell carcinoma, the relative level of miR-34a in the early-stage OC group was significantly higher than that in the advanced-stage OC group

Full size image

Correlation of serum exosomal miR-34a levels with serum CA125 levels

Serum CA125 is best known as a biomarker to monitor epithelial ovarian cancer and for the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses according to previous reports [9, 22, 23]. Serum levels of CA125 are routinely monitored in patients with OC, and an increase from an individualized nadir concentration is a prognostic indicator of cancer recurrence [24]. Therefore, we examined whether the level of serum exosomal miR-34a was correlated with that of serum CA125. No significant correlation was detected (n = 52) (R = 0.0002) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

There was no correlation between the relative serum exosomal miR-34a level and the serum CA125 level

Full size image

Differences in miR-34a profiles by histological type in ovarian cancer tissue and cell lines

We examined whether the profile of miR-34a differed among histological types. The relative level of miR-34a in clear cell carcinoma tissue was significantly higher than that in serous or endometrioid carcinoma tissue (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, we examined the relative level of miR-34a in different types of human ovarian cancer cell lines. The relative miR-34a level in RMG-1 (clear cell carcinoma) cells was significantly higher than that in CAOV3 (mucinous carcinoma) or A2780 (serous carcinoma) cells (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

a The relative level of tissue miR-34a in clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that in serous carcinoma or mucinous carcinoma. b The relative miR-34a level in clear cell carcinoma RMG-1 cells was significantly higher than that in CAOV3 (mucinous carcinoma) or A2780 (serous carcinoma) cells

Full size image

Discussion

In women, OC has the fifth highest mortality rate among malignant tumors. To diagnose and treat OC at an early stage and thus obtain a good prognosis, the identification of useful and non-invasive screening methods is important.

In recent years, numerous studies have confirmed the potential utility of miRNA in tumor diagnosis and prognosis assessment [10]. MiR-34a detected in plasma has been proposed as a biomarker in breast cancer [25] and lung cancer [26]. It was reported that a lot of miRNA are deferentially expressed in OC. Deb et al. summarized the current knowledge regarding the role of miRNA expression in OC [27]. In addition, several previous studies have shown that stable circulating miRNAs play an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of OC [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, to our knowledge, few reports have described miRNA levels in exosomes isolated from the plasma of OC patients [16,17,18,19]. Tissue miRNAs present poor stability, but exosomal miRNAs in serum are thought to be more stable [28]. Therefore, we examined whether serum exosomal miR-34a serve as a potential biomarker of OC.

We focused on miRNA in serum exosomes, as exogenous miRNA added to plasma or blood is immediately degraded. Exosome are highly enriched in tetraspanins, a protein superfamily that organizes membrane microdomains [29,30,31]. We detected CD63 from isolated exosomes. CD63 encodes a protein that is a member of the tetraspanin family. Therefore, the expression of CD63 indicates the existence of exosomes. As we demonstrated, transmission electron microscopy revealed that the clusters isolated from serum were round or oval membrane vesicles largely between 30 and 100 nm in size and were homogeneous in appearance, suggesting that these vesicles were exosomes. Previous studies have also shown the significance of detecting exosomes using immunoblotting against CD63 and electron microscopy [16, 21, 32].

Exosomes derived from cancer contain tumor cell-specific miRNA, and hence they may be useful as potential biomarkers of disease progression. However, few reports have focused on serum exosomal miRNA [16,17,18,19], and thus this study may include some unique findings or interpretations. Interestingly, the analysis of the relative expression of serum exosomal miRNA in our study revealed that early-stage OC patients had significantly higher levels of exosomal miR-34a than advanced-stage patients. MiR-34a is usually downregulated and suppresses tumor migration and invasion by inhibiting c-Met expression [6]. A previous study showed that high c-Met expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis [33]. The decreased expression of miR-34a and the increased expression of HDAC1 are closely related to OC cell development, and thus miR-34a may function as a tumor repressor by directly targeting and modulating HDAC1 expression in OC cells. Therefore, miR-34a causes suppression of lymph node metastasis or tumor recurrence.

Our study shows the relative level of serum exosomal miR-34a was not significantly different between the early and advanced stages of serous carcinoma, while it was significantly different in non-serous carcinoma, especially clear cell carcinoma. There is evidence that p53, which acts as a tumor suppressor, transactivates the miR-34 family [34, 35]. These miRNAs interfere with the mRNA of crucial cellular proliferative and anti-apoptotic regulators and negatively control their expression, thus supporting cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis. The tumor-suppressing properties of this p53–miR34 interplay are of special importance during p53-detected DNA damage. Consecutive mutation of TP53 may favor carcinogenesis and tumor proliferation by reducing the levels of intracellular miR-34 family members. TP53 mutation represents the driver mutation in more than 95% of high-grade serous cancer cases, but is very uncommon in non-serous carcinoma, such as clear cell carcinoma [36, 37]. We postulate that this difference in TP53 mutation may correlate with the expression of miR-34a.

Tumor biomarkers are a focus of tumor research, and recent studies have identified the potential of various tumor biomarkers in gynecological oncology in addition to their diagnostic application. For example, the expression of p16 INK4a protein has been reported as a progression/regression tumor marker in LSIL cervix lesions [38, 39]. Other studies reported that combinations including a five-DNA methylation panel [40], a circulating miRNA panel [12], a serum miRNA and CA125 panel [41], and CPG island methylation [38] are of great significance in tumor diagnostic efficacy, prognosis, surgical guidance, and epigenetic therapy. In our study, Fig. 5 shows that there was no significant correlation between CA125 and miR-34a levels, indicating that the measurement of miR-34a may function as an independent biomarker of OC from CA125. It is well-known that CA125 is most commonly used as a conventional tumor marker of OC, but it is elevated not only in ovarian cancer but also in benign ovarian cysts, including ovarian endometriotic cysts and luteal cysts, and endocrine, digestive, and nutritional metabolic diseases [16]. CA125 is also known to be elevated during menstruation [42]. Thus, CA125 is non-specific biomarker for OC. Therefore, our results demonstrating that CA125 is not correlated with miR-34a suggest that serum exosomal miR-34a could serve as a potential biomarker of OC in the clinic. Su et al. reported that serum exosomal miR-375 and miR-1307 enhance the diagnostic power of CA125 [16]. CA125 and miR-34a may function as complimentary biomarkers of OC.

Serum exosomal miR-34a has great potential utility as a prognostic biomarker of OC. Regarding the utility of serum exosomal miR-34a as a diagnostic biomarker, we are currently examining whether the expression of serum exosomal miR-34a differs between healthy women and OC patients. In addition, regarding the application of other serum miRNAs as biomarkers, since microarray profiling followed by qRT-PCR validation is currently acknowledged as the standard method for evaluating miRNA [12], we are conducting further comprehensive serum miRNA array analyses using serum exosomes.

A strength of this study is that it shows that miR-34a has potential as a useful biomarker not only for diagnosis but also prognosis. In addition, we demonstrate that the potential of miR-34a may be independent from the existing biomarker CA125. However, several limitations in this study should be acknowledged. In the present study, the potential advantages of biomarkers were shown. However, due to the small sample size, we were unable to fully investigate other factors, as would be required to develop a useful biomarker. In particular, we failed to show why differences among histological subtypes of OC occur. Furthermore, particularly in cases in elderly women, the management of OC should be personalized because of their differences from younger patients [43, 44]. Further research in a larger cohort is required to pursue the potential of serum miR-34a as an OC biomarker.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that serum exosomal miR-34a could serve as potential biomarker of OC, and may be independent from CA125.

Availability of data and materials

The data used or analyzed are all contained within this published article.

References

  1. Yamagami W, Nagase S, Takahashi F, Ino K, Hachisuga T, Aoki D, Katabuchi H. Clinical statistics of gynecologic cancers in Japan. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(2):e32..

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman RL, Monk BJ, Sood AK, Herzog TJ. Latest research and treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:211–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pillai RS. MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA. 2005;11(12):1753–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CZ, Li L, Lodish HF, Bartel DP. MicroRNAs modulate hematopoietic lineage differentiation. Science. 2004;303(5654):83–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Croce CM, Calin GA. MiRNAs, cancer, and stem cell division. Cell. 2005;122(1):6–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li N, Fu H, Tie Y, Hu Z, Kong W, Wu Y, Zheng X. MiR-34a inhibits migration and invasion by down-regulation of c-Met expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2009;275(1):44–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsui NB, Ng EK, Lo YM. Stability of endogenous and added RNA in blood specimens, serum, and plasma. Clin Chem. 2002;48(10):1647–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratajczak J, Miekus K, Kucia M, Zhang J, Reca R, Dvorak P, Ratajczak MZ. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia. 2006;20(5):847–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren X, Zhang H, Cong H, Wang X, Ni H, Shen X, Ju S. Diagnostic model of serum miR-193a-5p, HE4 and CA125 improves the diagnostic efficacy of epithelium ovarian Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2018;24(4):939–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokoi A, Yoshioka Y, Hirakawa A, Yamamoto Y, Ishikawa M, Ikeda SI, Kato T, Niimi K, Kajiyama H, Kikkawa F, Ochiya T. A combination of circulating miRNAs for the early detection of ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(52):89811–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwarzenbach H. Clinical significance of miR-15 and miR-16 in ovarian cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2016;5(suppl 1):S50–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Meng X, Muller V, Milde-Langosch K, Trillsch F, Pantel K, Schwarzenbach H. Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of circulating exosomal miR-373, miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-200c in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(13):16923–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan C, Stevic I, Müller V, Ni Q, Oliveira-Ferrer L, Pantel K, Schwarzenbach H. Exosomal microRNAs as tumor markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol. 2018;12(11):1935–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi M, Sawada K, Nakamura K, Yoshimura A, Miyamoto M, Shimizu A, Ishida K, Nakatsuka E, Kodama M, Hashimoto K, Mabuchi S, Kimura T. Exosomal miR-1290 is a potential biomarker of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and can discriminate patients from those with malignancies of other histological types. J Ovarian res. 2018;11:81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Kong D, Wang C, Ding X, Zhang L, Zhao M, Chen J, Xu X, Hu X, Yang J, Gao S. Circulating microRNAs as novel potential diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Su YY, Sun L, Guo ZR, Li JC, Bai TT, Cai XX, Li WH, Zhu YF. Upregulated expression of serum exosomal miR-375 and miR-1307 enhance the diagnostic power of CA125 for ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumura T, Sugimachi K, Iinuma H, Takahashi Y, Kurashige J, Sawada G, Ueda M, Uchi R, Ueo H, Takano Y, Shinden Y, Eguchi H, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Mori M, Ochiya T, Mimori K. Exosomal microRNA in serum is a novel biomarker of recurrence in human colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(2):275–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Madhavan B, Yue S, Galli U, Rana S, Gross W, Müller M, Giese NA, Kalthoff H, Becker T, Büchler MW, Zöller M. Combined evaluation of a panel of protein and miRNA serum-exosome biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis increases sensitivity and specificity. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(11):2616–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nedaeinia R, Manian M, Jazayeri MH, Ranjbar M, Salehi R, Sharifi M, Mohaghegh F, Goli M, Jahednia SH, Avan A, Ghayour-Mobarhan M. Circulating exosomes and exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017;24(2):48–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taniguchi K, Sakai M, Sugito N, Kumazaki M, Shinohara H, Yamada N, Nakayama T, Ueda H, Nakagawa Y, Ito Y, Futamura M, Uno B, Otsuki Y, Yoshida K, Uchiyama K, Akao Y. PTBP1-associated microRNA-1 and -133b suppress the Warburg effect in colorectal tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7(14):18940–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Gsg. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Boil. 2007;9:654–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duffy MJ, Bonfrer JM, Kulpa J, Rustin GJ, Soletormos G, Torre GC, Tuxen MK, Zwirner M. CA125 in ovarian cancer: European group on tumor markers guidelines for clinical use. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:679–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sturgeon CM, Duffy MJ, Stenman UH, Lilja H, Brünner N, Chan DW, Babaian R, Bast RC Jr, Dowell B, Esteva FJ, Haglund C, Harbeck N, Hayes DF, Holten-Andersen M, Klee GG, Lamerz R, Looijenga LH, Molina R, Nielsen HJ, Rittenhouse H, Semjonow A, Shih IM, Sibley P, Sölétormos G, Stephan C, Sokoll L, Hoffman BR, Diamandis EP, National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Clin Chem. 2008;54:e11–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Felder M, Kapur A, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Horibata S, Heintz J, Albrecht R, Fass L, Kaur J, Hu K, Shojaei H, Whelan RJ, Patankar MS. MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Orangi E, Motovali-Bashi M. Evaluation of miRNA-9 and miRNA-34a as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer in Iranian women. Gene. 2019;687:272–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Franchina T, Amodeo V, Bronte G, Savio G, Ricciardi GR, Picciotto M, Russo A, Giordano A, Adamo V. Circulating miR-22, miR-24 and miR-34a as novel predictive biomarkers to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229(1):97–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deb B, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. miRNAs and ovarian cancer: an overview. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:3846–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Niel G, Porto-Carreiro I, Simoes S, Raposo G. Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function. J Biochem. 2006;140:13–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Charrin S, le Naour F, Silvie O, Milhiet PE, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E. Lateral organization of membrane proteins: tetraspanins spin their web. Biochem J. 2009;420:133–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hemler ME. Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:801–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yáñez-Mó M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M, Sala-Valdés M, Sánchez-Madrid F. Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:434–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baranyai T, Herczeg K, Onódi Z, Voszka I, Módos K, Marton N, Nagy G, Mäger I, Wood MJ, El Andaloussi S, Pálinkás Z, Kumar V, Nagy P, Kittel Á, Buzás EI, Ferdinandy P, Giricz Z. Isolation of Exosomes from blood plasma: qualitative and quantitative comparison of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography methods. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim JH, Jang HJ, Kim HS, Kim BJ, Park SH. Prognostic impact of high c-met expression in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer. 2018;9:3427–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Welponer H, Tsibulak I, Wieser V, Degasper C, Shivalingaiah G, Wenzel S, Sprung S, Marth C, Hackl H, Fiegl H, Zeimet AG. The miR-34 family and its clinical significance in ovarian cancer. J Cancer. 2020;11(6):1446–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wong MY, Yu Y, Walsh WR, Yang JL. microRNA-34 family and treatment of cancers with mutant or wild-type p53 (review). Int J Oncol. 2011;38:1189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kurman RJ, Shih IM. The dualistic model of ovarian carcinogenesis: revisited, revised, and expanded. Am J Pathol. 2016;186:733–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, Lynch AG, Riad M, Sharma R, Stewart C, Fereday S, Caldas C, Defazio A, Bowtell D, Brenton JD. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol. 2010;221:49–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Valenti G, Vitale SG, Tropea A, Biondi A, Laganà AS. Tumor markers of uterine cervical cancer: a new scenario to guide surgical practice? Updat Surg. 2017;69(4):441–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vitale SG, Valenti G, Rapisarda AMC, Cali I, Marilli I, Zigarelli M, Sarpietro G, Cianci A. P16INK4a as a progression/regression tumour marker in LSIL cervix lesions: our clinical experience. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2016;37(5):685–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo W, Zhu L, Yu M, Zhu R, Chen Q, Wang Q. A five-DNA methylation signature act as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10(1):142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shah JS, et al. Combining serum microRNA and CA-125 as prognostic indicators of preoperative surgical outcome in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;148(1):181–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, Dimet J, Winer N, Ducarme G. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schuurman MS, Kruitwagen RFPM, Portielje JEA, Roes EM, Lemmens VEPP, van der Aa MA. Treatment and outcome of elderly patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer: a nationwide analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149(2):270–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Zito G, Lopez S, Gulino FA, Di Guardo F, Vitagliano A, Noventa M, La Rosa VL, Sapia F, Valenti G, Rapisarda AMC, Peterlunger I, Rossetti D, Laganà AS. Management of endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to a challenging condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):299–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank H. Nikki March, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

We have no commercial or financial incentive associated with the publication of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan

    Kazuya Maeda, Hiroshi Sasaki, Shoko Ueda, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Shinichi Terada, Hiromi Konishi, Yuhei Kogata, Keisuke Ashihara, Satoe Fujiwara, Yoshimichi Tanaka, Tomohito Tanaka, Masami Hayashi & Masahide Ohmichi

  2. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan

    Yuko Ito & Yoichi Kondo

  3. Division of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan

    Takahiro Ochiya

Authors
  1. Kazuya Maeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroshi Sasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shoko Ueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shunsuke Miyamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shinichi Terada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiromi Konishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuhei Kogata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Keisuke Ashihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Satoe Fujiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yoshimichi Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tomohito Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Masami Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yuko Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yoichi Kondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Takahiro Ochiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Masahide Ohmichi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KM performed the western blotting, qRT-PCR, and data analysis, interpreted the results, and drafted and wrote the manuscript. HS conceived and designed the experiments, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. SU, SM, and ST supported the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. YK, KA, and SF designed the experiments and critically revised the manuscript. YT, TT, and MH critically revised the manuscript. YI and YK supported the electron microscopy. TO supported the isolation of exosomes from plasma and the extraction of exosomal miRNAs. MO designed and supervised the experiments, interpreted the results, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuya Maeda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval from the ethics committee of Osaka Medical College was obtained for the use of all samples.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maeda, K., Sasaki, H., Ueda, S. et al. Serum exosomal microRNA-34a as a potential biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 13, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00648-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00648-1

Keywords

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us