Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion on reproductive outcomes in unexpected poor ovarian responders: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Managing infertility patients with poor ovarian response (POR) to ovarian stimulation remains unmet clinically. Besides economic burdens, patients with POR have a poor prognosis during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion on reproductive outcomes in POSEIDON patients (Group 2a).

Methods

Women eligible for IVF were invited to participate in this randomized, open-label, superiority trial at an academic fertility center from January 2022 to December 2023. One hundred patients ≤ 44 years old equally divided between Shen Que moxibustion (SQM) and control groups were randomized. These patients must meet the POSEIDON criteria, Group 2a, which requires antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5 or anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) ≥ 1.2ng/ml, and a previous unexpected POR (< 4 oocytes). Twelve moxibustion sessions were conducted in the SQM group prior to oocyte retrieval, while only IVF treatment was performed in the control group. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved.

Results

As compared with the IVF treatment alone, the SQM + IVF treatment significantly increased the number of retrieved oocytes (4.7 vs. 5.8, p = 0.012), mature oocytes (3.0 vs. 5.0, p = 0.008), and available embryos (2.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.014) in unexpected poor ovarian responders aged more than 35 years. In the SQM group, the cumulative live birth rate was 27.3% (9/33) in comparison to 13.3% (4/30) in the control group, whereas no statistical significance was detected (p = 0.172). During the study, no significant adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions

Women with unexpected POR who meet POSEIDON Group 2a can benefit from Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05653557.

Introduction

Worldwide childbearing postponement has been on the rise over the past few decades due to various socioeconomic factors, including contraceptive accessibility, economic prosperity, high education level, and female workforce engagement [1, 2]. This delay contributes to a higher average age at the first attempt at conception, proportionally more live births in their thirties, and higher miscarriage rates [2, 3]. Following-through effects are evident in the disproportionate use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) services among women of advanced reproductive age [4]. Besides, women are more susceptible to POR during ovarian stimulation (OS) in their mid to late thirties because of ovarian ageing. This illustrates the critical need to devote considerably more attention to these ‘low-prognosis’ patients undergoing IVF-ET [5, 6].

Large discrepancies in POR definition exist in the preceding studies [7]. Moreover, the estimated POR prevalence ranges from 6 to 43%, so management of patients with POR remains a challenge for reproductive experts [8,9,10]. Herein, the Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) classification was developed to provide a homogeneous and refined POR definition, resulting in significant heterogeneity reduction in the Bologna POR population and individualized treatment promotion [11]. Among all POSEIDON patients, group 2 (age ≥ 35 yrs. and AFC ≥ 5 or AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/ml) has been estimated to constitute 36% [8]. Furthermore, POSEIDON group 2a subpopulations have a lower prognosis due to an age-related increase in oocyte euploidy, resulting in more aneuploid embryos and higher ET cancellation rates. Despite the need for more evidence, this might be accomplished, perhaps by adding complementary treatment to the OS protocol or before OS is initiated [12]. Despite the different pretreatment strategies, which include coenzyme Q10 and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), insufficient evidence has been found on the efficacy of these therapeutic agents to reverse low prognosis, particularly in women with POR [13].

Acupuncture and moxibustion, as an important complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), used to treat gynecological disorders for thousands of years, have been welcomed by many infertile couples in recent years [14]. As the name suggests, moxibustion involves igniting moxa velvet or sticks, after which they burn or fumigate the corresponding acupoints to achieve the purpose of treatment and prevention of disease. According to traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory, Shen Que (RN8) is the place where vitality converges under the navel, and is closely connected with the vitality generated by “Shen Qi”. Therefore, stimulating Shen Que (RN8) may stimulate the essence stored in the “Shen”, and improve the female fertility of “Wu Qi” (age ≥ 35 yrs.) originating from the “Inner Canon of Huangdi”. Moxibustion has been shown to improve ovarian functional reserve in patients with ovarian insufficiency in previous studies [15]. Moreover, a recent study demonstrates that moxibustion can enhance the antioxidant defense ability of naturally aging ovaries and inhibiting apoptotic events [16]. Nevertheless, studies on Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion in advanced-age women with unexpected POR who undergo IVF-ET are very limited. Consequently, we designed this randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion on reproductive outcomes in POSEIDON patients (Group 2a).

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a randomized, open-label, superiority, controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation to either SQM or control groups. Following the study approval by Ethics Committees of the affiliated hospital of Shandong University of TCM, all couples provided voluntary written informed consent prior to participation. The study followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting guideline.

Study population

In January 2022 through December 2023, participants were recruited from the public through daily outpatient services and posters and leaflets. Interested patients were referred to the study site or self-approached to undergo eligibility assessments. Pre-screening was conducted via telephone interview. Those who were potentially eligible for recruitment to the study were interviewed face-to-face. During the interview, assessors explained the overall objectives and nature of the study, demonstrated the informed consent process, and assessed the subjects’ eligibility for enrollment in the study.

Eligibility criteria

POSEIDON Group 2a is known as ≥ 35 years old with normal pre-stimulation ovarian reserve parameters (AFC ≥ 5 or AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/ml) and with an unexpected POR (fewer than 4 oocytes) after standard OS. Patients meeting these criteria will be included in the study.The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with extremely advanced age (≥ 45 years old); (2) individuals with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2; (3) those using the natural cycle or mild stimulation for IVF treatment; (4) those with a history of unilateral oophorectomy or recurrent pregnancy loss, defined as ≥ 2 spontaneous miscarriage; (5) acceptors of donated oocytes or performed either in vitro maturation (IVM) or blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A); (6) those diagnosed with congenital (e.g., mediastinal uterus and double uterus) or acquired (e.g., submucosal myoma and adenomyosis) uterine abnormalities.

Randomization and masking

Randomization was implemented via sealed, sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes containing random assignment codes. Using R software, version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), a statistician, unaware of the study’s objectives, generated the codes using the block randomization method. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either of the two groups: the IVF treatment group (control group) or the combined Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion and IVF treatment group (SQM group).

Interventions

Participants in the SQM group were required to undergo 12 sessions of herb-partitioned moxibustion administered at RN8 (Shen Que), with a 3-day (+ 1 day) interval between sessions from the previous menstrual cycle day 2 before OS until oocyte retrieval. First, to prepare the Wenqi Zhongzi formula, all drugs in the formula were ground into powder, mixed evenly, and then placed into a sealed bottle. This formula contained Wu Ling Zhi (Faeces Togopteri, 6 g), Bai Zhi (Radix Angelicae Dahuricae, 6 g), Da Qing Yan (lake salt, 6 g), Shu Fu Zi (Radix Aconiti Lateralis Preparata, 3 g), Chuan Jiao (Pericarpium Zanthoxyli, 3 g) and Bing Pian (Borneolum Syntheticum, 0.3 g). Ten moxa cones are used for this procedure, which takes 120 min, and abdominal irradiation with infrared rays will be used during moxibustion. Participants in the control group were not scheduled to visit the clinic until the OS. For the duration of the procedure, patients are recommended to close their eyes and rest. Following moxibustion, the umbilicus will be affixed and sealed with a medical applicator and removed after 24 h. For the subsequent steps, consult our previously published works [17, 18]. All eligible participants must commence the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol 2–3 days into the subsequent menstrual cycle. Details of our controlled OS regimen, gamete handling, IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), embryo culture, ET, and luteal support were described elsewhere [19]. Hormone replacement treatment was used for FET endometrial preparation. Treatment with estradiol valerate (E2, Progynova, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was commenced on the third day of the menstrual cycle at 6 mg daily for 10–12 days. Moreover, vaginal progesterone (90 mg per day, 8% Crinone, Merck-Serono, Switzerland) and dydrogesterone (20 mg twice a day, Abbott Laboratories biologicals) were administered, upon the endometrial layer reaching a thickness of 7 mm as revealed by pelvic ultrasound scanning.

Outcome measurements

Primary outcome measure

The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved per OS cycle.

Secondary outcome measures

Cycle cancellation rate is defined as cycle cancelled before obtaining at least one viable embryo for any reason. Number of Metaphase II (MII) eggs are defined as eggs retrieved that reach the MII phase. Top quality embryos (TQE) are defined as embryos with more than six even blastomeres and < 20% fragmentation. Embryo implantation rate per embryo defined as the percentage of the number of the gestational sac to the total transferred embryos. Cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was defined as the proportion of live births delivered per initiated IVF cycle or per oocyte retrieval, including all fresh and frozen embryo transfers up to one live birth.

Sample size calculation and statistical analysis

In this study, the sample size was calculated using data from our reproductive center, combined with that from a recently published study [20]. The study was designed to detect a difference between the two groups in terms of one additional retrieved oocyte after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day at p = 0.05 and power = 80%, with a standard deviation (SD) of 1.5 retrieved oocytes. Assuming a 20% drop-out rate, the sample size of 100 was determined using Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS) software 2021 (NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA), with 50 participants were in each group. For the primary statistical analysis, we followed the per-protocol principle. We compared continuous data utilizing a student t-test or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and the results are given as mean (SD) or median (IQR, interquartile range). Categorical data were assessed using chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test for expected frequencies < 5. A two-sided P value of < 0.05 was considered statistical significance. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 and R statistical package version 4.0.0.

Results

Enrolled patients and baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics of patients were comparable between the study groups (Table 1). A total of 14 patients deviated from the protocol, including 6 of 50 (12.0%) in SQM group and 8 of 50 (16.0%) in control group (Fig. 1). After OS, 4 of 45 (8.9%) in SQM group had no oocytes retrieved. Additionally, 7 of 45 (15.6%) in SQM group and 15 of 46 (32.6%) in control group did not have an embryo available for transfer (Table S1).

Table 1 Participants’ baseline characteristics on menstrual cycle days 2–3
Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study design

OS and pregnancy outcomes

The primary statistical analysis was performed according to the per-protocol (PP) principle. Table 2 presents the primary outcomes. In the SQM group, the number of retrieved oocytes (5.8 vs. 4.7, p = 0.012), mature oocytes (5.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.008), and available embryos (4.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.014) were significantly more than that in the control group. Furthermore, the SQM group has a higher percentage of patients with surplus frozen embryos after first ET (69.7% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.018). Other secondary outcomes, including the frequency of top-quality embryos and cycle cancellation rate, were similar between the groups. The embryo implantation rate (29.5% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.116), Live birth rate (LBR) per fresh ET (23.5% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.672) or FET (26.7% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.224), and CLBR (27.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.172) in the SQM group was slightly higher, although not significantly more than that in the control group. As shown in Table S1, the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis results were consistent with those from the PP analysis.

Table 2 IVF/ICSI outcomes and cumulative live birth rates in study population

Safety outcomes

No adverse events occurred in either SQM group versus control group. Safety indicators of complete blood cell count and liver and kidney function before and after treatment were within reasonable limits in both groups.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first RCT performed to examine herb-partitioned SQM effects on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing IVF-ET who fulfilled POSEIDON group 2a. In this open-label RCT, we found no significant differences in LBR per ET and CLBR between SQM and control groups. However, herb-partitioned SQM resulted in more retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and available embryos than IVF treatment alone.

Over 40% of patients treated in fertility centers are POSEIDON patients, despite geographical variations in prevalence. [21]. A solid and independent predictor of live birth is the number of oocytes retrieved during OS. POSEIDON patients of groups 1 and 2 are therefore managed primarily with the aim of maximizing their ovarian reserve and subsequently, the number of oocytes and embryos, thus increasing the chance that at least one euploid embryo can be transferred [22]. POR results in decreased oocyte production, cycle cancellation, and poor pregnancy outcomes [23]. Several clinical and non-clinical studies have attempted to develop OS protocols for POR and to assess the effect of adjuvant therapy with hormone supplementation or acupuncture. [24]. Moreover, a recent study suggests that acupuncture may improve AMH, AFC and the number of retrieved oocytes among women undergoing IVF-ET with POR [25]. Acupuncture interventions have been shown to benefit poor ovarian responders in numerous studies [26].

However, very few scholars have evaluated the effects of moxibustion on patients with POR, especially those with herb-partitioned SQM. Moxibustion is commonly used in the treatment of gynecological diseases because of the development of CAM. There are several benefits of moxibustion, such as simple operation, long-lasting results, low cost, ease of acceptance, no discomfort from needles, and no side effects [26,27,28]. As a novel and pioneering clinical study, we have discovered for the first time that herb-partitioned SQM can increase the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and transferable embryos for POSEIDON patients in group 2a.

Acupuncture and moxibustion have been employed as a treatment for infertility due to its ability to enhance the endometrium, stimulate ovulation, and alleviate discomfort during egg retrieval. Furthermore, acupuncture is frequently used in conjunction with IVF to improve fertilization rates [29]. Based on previous studies by Ho et al. and Stener-Victorin et al., electroacupuncture has the potential to decrease uterine artery blood flow impedance in infertile women undergoing IVF [30, 31]. Given that ovarian stromal blood flow is commonly utilized to predict ovarian response prior to IVF, it is plausible that acupuncture or moxibustion could potentially influence ovarian response [32]. As indicated by previous research, moxibustion can enhance ovarian function by reducing mitochondrial dysfunction and NLRP3-induced inflammation [33], modulating PI3K/AKT signaling pathways to suppress granulosa cell death [34], activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to mitigate inflammation [35], and augmenting antioxidant defense [16]. However, the acupoints for moxibustion in the above studies mainly focused on Shen Shu (BL23), Guan Yuan (CV4), and Zhong Wan (CV12), only one study addressed Shen Que (RN8) [33]. At present, the existing literature on moxibustion at Shen Que (RN8) point in the world mainly focuses on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea [36], so this study provides robust evidence for the promotion of SQM in POR.

However, our study also has some limitations. Firstly, for POR patients, more oocytes mean more opportunities, so we chose the number of oocytes obtained as the primary outcome, rather than the ultimate goal of assisted reproduction, live birth, although we achieved positive results. Secondly, the sample size is not large, which is of course also related to the choice of retrieved oocytes as the primary outcome, which consequently led to no statistical significance despite higher LBR and CLBR in the SQM group. Perhaps a larger sample size would be a better choice in the future. Moreover, the results of this study cannot exclude the placebo effect, therefore, using nontreatment as a control may exaggerate the effect of SQM. Finally, we only used cleavage stage embryos for transfer, which affected the universality of this study.

Conclusions

For women with unexpected POR who meet POSEIDON Group 2a, herb-partitioned SQM (RN8) can improve their egg retrieval and embryo outcomes, which is worth recommending. However, future studies still need to expand the sample size to evaluate pregnancy outcomes.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

POR:

Poor ovarian response

IVF-ET:

In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

SQM:

Shen Que moxibustion

AFC:

Antral follicle count

AMH:

Anti-müllerian hormone

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

OS:

Ovarian stimulation

POSEIDON:

Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number

DHEA:

Dehydroepiandrosterone

CAM:

Complementary and alternative medicine

TCM:

Traditional Chinese Medicine

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

BMI:

Body mass index

IVM:

In vitro maturation

PGD:

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

PGT-A:

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies

GnRH-ant:

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

TQE:

Top quality embryos

CLBR:

Cumulative live birth rate

hCG:

Human chorionic gonadotropin

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

PP:

Per-protocol

ITT:

Intention-to-treat

LBR:

Live birth rate

References

  1. Leridon H. Demographic effects of the introduction of steroid contraception in developed countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(5):603–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Timaeus IM, Moultrie TA. Pathways to low fertility: 50 years of limitation, curtailment, and postponement of Childbearing. Demography. 2020;57(1):267–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jing W, Liu J, Ma Q, Zhang S, Li Y, Liu M. Fertility intentions to have a second or third child under China’s three-child policy: a national cross-sectional study. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(8):1907–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meczekalski B, Szeliga A, Podfigurna A, Miechowicz I, Adashi EY. Assisted reproductive technology outcome in United States of America and Australia with New Zealand: comparison of annual reports 2005–2016. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(11):959–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen Y, Tannus S, Alzawawi N, Son WY, Dahan M, Buckett W. Poor ovarian response as a predictor for live birth in older women undergoing IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(4):435–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kocourkova J, Burcin B, Kucera T. Demographic relevancy of increased use of assisted reproduction in European countries. Reprod Health. 2014;11:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1058–e10611057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Carvalho JF, Ozbek IY, Polat M, Le HL, Pham TD, Ho TM. Low prognosis by the POSEIDON criteria in women undergoing assisted Reproductive Technology: a multicenter and multinational prevalence study of over 13,000 patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:630550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJ, Broekmans FJ, Broer SL. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrizio P, Vaiarelli A, Levi Setti PE, Tobler KJ, Shoham G, Leong M, Shoham Z. How to define, diagnose and treat poor responders? Responses from a worldwide survey of IVF clinics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(6):581–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poseidon G, Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1452–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu-Musa A, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Novel physiology and definition of poor ovarian response; clinical recommendations. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21(6).

  13. Zhu F, Yin S, Yang B, Li S, Feng X, Wang T, Che D. TEAS, DHEA, CoQ10, and GH for poor ovarian response undergoing IVF-ET: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou T, Zheng Q, Feng X, Liu Y, Wang L, Li Y. Efficacy and safety of moxibustion in female infertility patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a systematic review protocol. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(44):e17560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang RR, Su MH, Liu LY, Lai YY, Guo XL, Gan D, Zheng XY, Yang H, Yu SY, Liang FR, et al. Systematic review of acupuncture to improve ovarian function in women with poor ovarian response. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1028853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang X, Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang J, Huang F. Moxibustion improves ovary function by suppressing apoptosis events and upregulating antioxidant defenses in natural aging ovary. Life Sci. 2019;229:166–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia Q, Gao S, Song J, Du D, Li C, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Dong Z, Ma Y, Ma Y. Effectiveness of herb-partitioned moxibustion on the navel for pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Song J-Y, Dong F-Y, Wu Z-J, Ma Y-X, Sun Z-G. Impact of whole-systems traditional Chinese medicine therapy on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Integr Med. 2023;60:102246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Song JY, Gao DD, Cao XL, Xiang S, Chen YH, Teng YL, Li XF, Liu HP, Wang FX, Zhang B, et al. The role of traditional Chinese Formula Ding-Kun Pill (DKP) in expected poor ovarian response women (POSEIDON Group 4) undergoing in Vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, placebo-controlled trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:675997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J, Lee H, Choi TY, Kim JI, Kang BK, Lee MS, Joo JK, Lee KS, You S. Acupuncture for poor ovarian response: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2021, 10(10).

  21. Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Conforti A, Humaidan P, Alviggi C. POSEIDON groups and their distinct reproductive outcomes: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness insights from real-world data research. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;85(Pt B):159–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Conforti A, Esteves SC, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Di Rella F, Ubaldi FM, Zullo F, De Placido G, Alviggi C. Management of women with an unexpected low ovarian response to Gonadotropin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shanbhag S, Aucott L, Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MA, McTavish AR. Interventions for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(1):CD004379.

  24. Jeve YB, Bhandari HM. Effective treatment protocol for poor ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(2):70–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jang S, Kim KH, Jun JH, You S. Acupuncture for in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response: a systematic review. Integr Med Res. 2020;9(2):100395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie Y, Shi W, Tan Y, Yao M, Qing M, Luo X, Zhang W. Acupuncture and moxibustion for diminished ovarian reserve: a scoping review. Complement Ther Med. 2023;77:102973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang H, Li J, Zhou Y-c. Shen W-d: Research progress on acupuncture-moxibustion in treatment of refractory infertility: 针灸治疗难治性不孕的研究进展. World J Acupunct - Moxibustion. 2020;30(2):125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Quan K, Yu C, Wen X, Lin Q, Wang N, Ma H. Acupuncture as treatment for female infertility: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:3595033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheong Y, Nardo LG, Rutherford T, Ledger W. Acupuncture and herbal medicine in in vitro fertilisation: a review of the evidence for clinical practice. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2010;13(1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho M, Huang LC, Chang YY, Chen HY, Chang WC, Yang TC, Tsai HD. Electroacupuncture reduces uterine artery blood flow impedance in infertile women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(2):148–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stener-Victorin E, Waldenstrom U, Andersson SA, Wikland M. Reduction of blood flow impedance in the uterine arteries of infertile women with electro-acupuncture. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(6):1314–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan CC, Ng EH, Li CF, Ho PC. Impaired ovarian blood flow and reduced antral follicle count following laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yin Y, Li H, Qin Y, Chen T, Zhang Z, Lu G, Shen J, Shen M. Moxibustion mitigates mitochondrial dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammatory activation in cyclophosphamide-induced premature ovarian insufficiency rats. Life Sci. 2023;314:121283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li HX, Shi L, Liang SJ, Fang CC, Xu QQ, Lu G, Wang Q, Cheng J, Shen J, Shen MH. Moxibustion alleviates decreased ovarian reserve in rats by restoring the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. J Integr Med. 2022;20(2):163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Q, Lu G, Xie ZJ, Li HX, Shen MH. [Effect of moxibustion on Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in rats with diminished ovarian reserve]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021;41(1):53–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan LJ, Fang M, Zhu SJ, Wang ZJ, Hu XY, Liang SB, Wang D, Yang D, Shen C, Robinson N, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Chinese Medicine at Shenque (CV 8) for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Chin J Integr Med. 2023;29(4):341–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants and researchers for their contributions to this study.

Funding

This study was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3500400) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023LZY021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zhen-Gao Sun and Yu-Xia Ma conceived and designed the study; Jing-Yan Song was responsible for analysis and interpretation of the data and the drafting of the paper; Zhen-Gao Sun and Jing-Yan Song were responsible for data curation and supervision; Zhen-Gao Sun critically revised its intellectual content. All authors have approved the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen-Gao Sun or Yu-Xia Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SDUTCM-2021-011), and written informed consent was obtained from all individuals involved in the study. And the study was registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05653557, 08/12/2022).

Consent for publication

All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, JY., Sun, ZG. & Ma, YX. Efficacy and safety of Shen Que (RN8) moxibustion on reproductive outcomes in unexpected poor ovarian responders: a randomized controlled trial. J Ovarian Res 17, 177 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01493-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01493-2

Keywords