Skip to main content
Download PDF

Letrozole increases preantral follicle growth and decreases estradiol production without impairing follicle survival

Journal of Ovarian Research volume 15, Article number: 136 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Letrozole has been reported to be effective in treating anovulation, preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and retrieving oocytes in breast cancer patients. However, the role and mechanism of letrozole in follicular development remain unclear.

Results

We treated mouse preantral follicles with various treatments; we found no significant difference in follicle survival rates in the letrozole (LET) group compared with the control group, but the average diameter of follicles in the LET group tended to be larger (CTRL vs. LET 30, p = 0.064; CTRL vs. LET 100, p = 0.025). The estradiol concentrations in culture media of the LET group were significantly lower than those observed in the control group (CTRL vs. LET 30, p = 0.038; CTRL vs. LET 100, p = 0.025). We further found a marked increase in follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene expression in response to letrozole treatment (CTRL vs. LET 30, p = 0.075; CTRL vs. LET 100, p = 0.034). This result suggested that increased FSHR expression promotes follicle development. Letrozole inhibited aromatase activity, but the effect was limited. Letrozole did not significantly reduce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene expression.

Conclusions

Letrozole may promote follicle development by increasing the expression of FSHR. Letrozole may be useful for fertility preservation of patients with estrogen-dependent cancers such as breast cancer and various other cancers. Whether letrozole has a direct effect in reducing OHSS requires further investigation.

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age and often leads to infertility. Several criteria have been suggested for diagnosing PCOS, and the prevalence of PCOS varies from 8.7–17.8% in accordance with the different diagnostic criteria [1, 2]. PCOS is characterized by hyperandrogenism, ovulation disorder, and polycystic ovarian morphology. While the etiology of PCOS is unknown, excess androgens are thought to be a critical factor driving the pathology of PCOS [3,4,5].

Various management strategies have been proposed for infertile women with PCOS, but no definitive treatment has been established [6, 7]. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with gonadotropins is used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and leads to a higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) [8]. The clinical manifestation of OHSS includes abdominal tenderness and swelling, which are caused by an increased vascular permeability and effusion to the extravascular space. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a crucial role in the development of OHSS [9, 10]. At present, no effective methods for OHSS treatment have been established, and therefore prevention is critical.

Fertility preservation for patients with various cancers has become an important issue in recent years [11, 12]. Many cancer patients of childbearing age develop ovarian failure in response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [13], and the patients are often forced to give up their pregnancies. Many patients need embryo or oocyte cryopreservation before cancer treatment. Therefore, establishing a safe and effective method of ovarian stimulation is critical. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women of childbearing age. A major concern regarding fertility preservation is the exposure of patients to high amounts of estrogen during COS, since approximately two-thirds of breast cancer patients have estrogen-receptor-positive cancer, and estrogen promotes the growth of breast cancer cells [14].

In recent years, letrozole has attracted attention as an infertility treatment [15,16,17,18]. Letrozole is a targeted aromatase inhibitor that has been primarily used in post-menopausal women with breast cancer. It inhibits estrogen production by ovaries and subsequently interrupts the negative feedback action of estrogen on follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) production [19]. In this manner, letrozole increases FSH and indirectly promotes follicle development. However, estrogen depletion is also detrimental to follicle development [20]. Data on the effects of letrozole on follicle dynamics are limited. Additionally, some studies have reported that letrozole may suppress VEGF production and it can reduce the incidence of OHSS [21, 22]. However, whether letrozole affects follicles and influences or decreases the incidence or severity of OHSS has not been elucidated. In this study, we examined the direct effects of letrozole on murine secondary follicle development and the effect on the prevention of OHSS.

Results

We examined the effects of letrozole on murine secondary follicle development. We evaluated follicle survival rates and diameters in the control (CTRL), letrozole (LET) 30 ng/ml, and LET 100 ng/ml treatment groups at day 10. Follicle survival rates of all groups were between 87% and 89%; there was no significant difference among the groups (P = 0.247) (Fig. 1). The average diameter of follicles in the LET 100 ng/ml group was significantly larger than that observed in the CTRL group (248.11 ± 57.43 µm vs. 209.95 ± 65.11 µm, respectively; P = 0.025). The follicle diameter in the LET 30 ng/ml group (249.04 ± 58.57 µm) tended to be larger than that observed in the CTRL group (P = 0.064) (Fig. 2). The rates of follicles above 250 µm in size, which might be a threshold of antrum formation [23], was 39.3% in CTRL, 43.5% in LET 30 ng/ml, and 60.0% in LET 100 ng/ml.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Follicle survival rates in the control (CTRL), letrozole (LET) 30 ng/ml, and LET 100 ng/ml treatment groups at day 10 of culture. CTRL group, base media plus letrozole vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO); LET 30 group, base media plus 30 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO; and LET 100 group, base media plus 100 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO. Data are expressed as mean ± standard errors. There was no significant difference in follicle survival rates among the groups (P = 0.247, one-way ANOVA)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of letrozole (LET) on average follicle diameters. Follicle growth was monitored at the indicated time points. Follicles were treated as described in Fig. 1. Data are expressed as mean ± standard errors. *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis

Full size image

At day 10, estradiol (E2) concentrations in the culture media were 1.48 ± 0.57 ng/mL in the CTRL group, 0.95 ± 0.27 ng/mL in the LET 30 ng/ml group, and 1.05 ± 0.37 ng/mL in the LET 100 ng/ml group (Fig. 3). The E2 concentrations in culture media of the LET 30 ng/ml and LET 100 ng/ml group were significantly lower than those observed in the CTRL group (P = 0.038 and P = 0.025, respectively). No concentration-dependent difference in E2 concentration was observed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Estradiol (E2) concentrations in culture media at day 10. Follicles were treated as described in Fig. 1. Data are expressed mean ± standard errors. *P < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc analysis

Full size image

VEGF concentrations in culture media on day 10 were 31.09 ± 17.48 pg/mL in the CTRL group, 26.31 ± 17.28 pg/mL in the LET 30 ng/ml group, and 41.54 ± 32.83 pg/mL in the LET 100 ng/ml group (Fig. 4). There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.374).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations in culture media at day 10. CTRL group, base media plus letrozole vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO); LET 30 group, CTRL media plus 30 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO; and LET 100 group, CTRL media plus 100 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO. Data are expressed mean ± standard errors. There was no significant difference in VEGF production among these groups (P = 0.374, one-way ANOVA)

Full size image

The relative mRNA levels of FSH receptor (FSHR), aromatase (Cyp19a1), and VEGF in the experimental groups are shown in Fig. 5. Fshr mRNA was significantly higher in the LET 100 ng/ml group than that observed in the CTRL group (P = 0.034). Fshr mRNA levels in the LET 30 ng/ml group tended to be higher than that observed in the CTRL group, but there was no significant difference (P = 0.075). Cyp19, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp19a1) mRNA levels in the LET groups tended to be higher than that in the CTRL group, with no significant difference (P = 0.072) (Fig. 5). Vegf mRNA in the LET groups tended to be higher than that observed in the CTRL group, but there was no statistically significant difference among these groups (P = 0.089) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of letrozole (LET) on gene expression of hormone receptors, Fshr, Cyp19a1, and Vegf. Isolated follicles were cultured for 10 days and then analyzed for gene expression of (A) Fshr, (B) Cyp19a1, and (C) Vegf. CTRL group, base media plus letrozole vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO); LET 30 group, CTRL media plus 30 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO; and LET 100 group, CTRL media plus 100 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO. Data are expressed as mean ± standard errors and have been log2 transformed. LET 30 and LET100 groups were compared with the control. *P < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc analysis

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we found that letrozole promoted the growth of secondary follicles without affecting survival. Letrozole also suppresses E2 production without a negative effect on follicular development. This result suggests that letrozole may be a potential candidate for follicular stimulation for infertility treatment and fertility preservation. Our results showed that letrozole significantly decreased E2 production; however, the decrease was not as drastic as expected. We speculate that E2 levels are initially decreased by letrozole but eventually return close to normal levels as a long-term consequence of the increased Cyp19 gene expression and testosterone synthesis (the primary substrate for E2) [24]. It may be theoretically reasonable to use combined letrozole and tamoxifen in egg retrieval in breast cancer patients because tamoxifen inhibits E2 to bind to E2 receptor. However, tamoxifen also increases E2, and thus studies are needed to elucidate the effects of combined use of letrozole and tamoxifen on follicle dynamics.

To explore the potential molecular mechanism of letrozole on follicle development, we evaluated the expressions of various genes related to follicle development. Our results revealed a significant increase in FSHR gene transcription in response to letrozole administration. This result suggested that increased FSHR expression potentiates FSH actions and subsequently promotes follicle development. This finding is in accordance with previous studies showing that letrozole not only exerts a negative feedback effect on the pituitary gland (increased secretion of FSH) from estrogen depletion, but it also induces the accumulation of testosterone in the follicles and subsequent increase in FSHR expression [25, 26] Several studies reported decreased oocyte maturation rates in COS with letrozole [27, 28]. Therefore, the follicle diameter in response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger should be larger than that in standard COS to obtain equivalent mature oocytes [29]. It may delay the hCG trigger and oocyte retrieval, which is not acceptable in patients with cancer. Accelerated follicle growth by letrozole may counterbalance the delay of hCG trigger.

Letrozole did not inhibit aromatase mRNA, but instead it increased it. This may be because of a compensatory increase in Cyp19 mRNA for inhibition of the aromatase enzyme by letrozole; otherwise, testosterone elevation enhances the action of FSHR on Cyp19 expression, which itself stimulates Cyp19 [30, 31].

In this study, letrozole did not significantly reduce VEGF gene expression, and we could not find the mechanisms of reducing OHSS risk by letrozole. Previous studies have shown a positive association between VEGF and follicle development, and VEGF expression may be strictly dependent on follicle diameter [32]. Additionally, we evaluated non-luteinized follicles, and VEGF secretion is increased in luteinized granulosa cells. Since VEGF increases after the luteinizing hormone surge in vivo, further studies are needed to reveal whether hCG administration enhances the effect of letrozole on VEGF suppression.

Conclusions

Letrozole may promote follicle development by increasing the expression of FSHR. Letrozole may be useful for fertility preservation of patients with estrogen-dependent cancers such as breast cancer and various other cancers. Whether letrozole has a direct effect in reducing OHSS should be explored in further investigations.

Methods

Animals and cell culture

Female ICR mice were obtained from Sankyo Labo Service Corporation (Sapporo, Japan). Mice were handled following the guidelines provided by Sapporo Medical University and the Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. Animal protocols were approved by the Sapporo Medical University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six-week-old female ICR mice (n = 4) were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (120 mg/kg). Ovaries were removed and secondary follicles (100–160 µm in diameter) were mechanically isolated using 30-gauge needles under an inverted microscope. Follicles with an intact basement membrane, clear granulosa cell layers and oocytes, and centrally located round oocytes were selected. Each follicle was placed individually into wells of a 48-well multiple cell-repellent surface plate (Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) to eliminate factors that regulate follicle growth and steroidogenesis, such as pituitary gonadotropins, steroid hormones, and local growth factors. Each well contained 300 µL of Alpha Minimum Essential Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Corning, Corning, NY, USA), 6 µg/mL insulin, 5.5 µg/mL transferrin, 6.7 ng/mL sodium selenite, 200 IU/mL penicillin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 33 mIU/mL follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A previous study showed that the minimal FSH concentration required to elicit a maximal FSH-induced growth response was 67 mIU/mL [33]. Follicles were cultured at 37°C in a humidified environment containing 5% CO2. Every other day, half of the culture medium was exchanged with fresh medium. Culture was continued for 10 days.

To evaluate the effects of letrozole on early folliculogenesis, follicles from four mice (12 follicles/mouse/group) were randomly assigned to one of three culture conditions: 1) control (CTRL) group, base media plus letrozole vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO); 2) LET 30 group, CTRL media plus 30 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO; and 3) LET 100 group, CTRL media plus 100 ng/mL letrozole and DMSO. Letrozole was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). We decided the concentrations of letrozole treatment in this study according to the interview form of letrozole provided by the Novartis Pharma Japan. The form indicates that the serum concentration of letrozole is 10–100 ng/ml in women administered 2.5mg a day for 7 days (almost the same as a schedule for ovarian stimulation).

Follicle survival and growth

Follicle survival and growth were assessed at days 1, 5, and 10 using an SMZ18 inverted microscope system (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Follicles were considered to be degenerating if oocytes became dark or were ejected outside of the follicle, if granulosa cells were dark and lysed, or if the diameter of the follicle decreased. The diameter of each follicle was determined as the average of two perpendicular measurements using NIS Elements Documentation D 3.22.00 (Nikon).

Measurement of E2 and VEGF

Concentrations of E2 in the culture media were measured at day 10 using an estradiol ELISA test kit (Neogen, Lansing, MI) with a detection range of 0–2.0 ng/mL following the manufacturer’s instructions. VEGF levels in the culture media were measured using a VEGF ELISA test kit (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), with a detection range of 0–500 pg/mL, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Interassay and intraassay coefficients of variance in these kits were below 10%.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

At day 10 of culture, six to ten follicles in each experimental group were analyzed for mRNA expression. Each follicle was ruptured using a 30-gauge needle, and the follicle wall and cumulus cells were collected for RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated using the Absolutely RNA Nanoprep Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using the Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was carried out using a TaqMan gene expression assay and AB StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression levels of FSH receptor (Fshr) (Assay ID: Mm00442819_m1), aromatase (cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily a, polypeptide 1, Cyp19a1) (Assay ID: Mm00484049_m1), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (Vegfa) (Assay ID: Mm00437306_m1), and 18S ribosomal RNA (Assay ID: Mm03928990_g1), as the normalization control were analyzed. The amplification program included 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s. All reactions were run in triplicate. Gene expressions were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Data analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc analysis with SigmaPlot version 13.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) for comparison of data among different treatment groups. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Availability of data and materials

We are not sharing the data and material used in this manuscript, as they will be used for subsequent research.

Abbreviations

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

E2:

estradiol

VEGF:

vascular endothelial growth factor

FSHR:

follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

Cyp19a1 :

cytochrome, P450, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 

PCOS:

polycystic ovary syndrome

COS:

controlled ovarian stimulation

OHSS:

ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

hCG:

human chorionic gonadotropin

References

  1. March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DI, Norman RJ, Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:544–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knochenhauer ES, Key TJ, Kahsar-Miller M, Waggoner W, Boots LR, Azziz R. Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:3078–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCartney CR, Marshall JC. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zawadski JK, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens JR, Haseltine F, editors. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1992. pp. 377–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baba T, Endo T, Adachi S, Ikeda K, Shimizu A, Morishita M, et al. Excessive androgen exposure as an etiological factor of polycystic ovary syndrome. J Mamm Ova Res. 2014;31:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jirege PR, Patill RS. Comparison of endocrine and ultrasound profiles during ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate and letrozole in ovulatory volunteer women. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rouzi AA, Ardawi MS. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of rosiglitazone and clomiphene citrate versus metformin and clomiphene citrate in women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:428–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer D, Reisenbüchler C, Rösner S, Haussmann J, Wimberger P, Goeckenjan M. Avoiding OHSS. Controlled ovarian low-dose stimulation in women with PCOS. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76:718–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:559–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geva E, Jaffe RB. Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian physiology and pathology. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:429–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, Quinn GP, Reinecke J, Taylor HS, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1994–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R, Hoekstra HJ, Pavlidis N, Kesic V, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:160–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:535–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Copson ER, Maishman TC, Tapper WJ, Cutress RI, Greville-Heygate S, Altman DG, et al. Germline BRCA mutations and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:169–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Legro RS, Brzyski RG, Diamond MP, Coutifaris C, Schlaff WD, Casson P. Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:119–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pavone ME, Bulun SE. Clinical review: the use of aromatase inhibitors for ovulation induction and superovulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1838–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oktay K, Hourvitz A, Sahin G, Oktem O, Safro B, Cil A, et al. Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3885–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keskin U, Ercan CM, Yilmaz A, Babacan A, Korkmaz C, Duru NK, et al. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with letrozole for fertility preservation in cancer patients: case series and review of literature. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64:830–2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mitwally M, Casper R. Aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction. Semin Reprod Med. 2004;22:61–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ting AY, Xu J, Stouffer RL. Differential effects of estrogen and progesterone on development of primate secondary follicles in a steroid-depleted milieu in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(8):1907–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Velasco JA, Quea G, Piró M, Mayoral M, Ruiz M, Toribio M, et al. Letrozole administration during the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation impacts corpus luteum function: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:222–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mai Q, Hu X, Yang G, Luo Y, Huang K, Yuan Y, et al. Effect of letrozole on moderate and severe early-onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk women: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:42. e1-10.

  23. Xiao S, Duncan FE, Bai L, Nguyen CT, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. Size-specific follicle selection improves mouse oocyte reproductive outcomes. Reproduction. 2015;150:183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gregoriou O, Vlahos NF, Konidaris S, Papadias K, Dimitrios B, Creatsas GK. Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined to intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2007;90:678–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robert FC, Mohamed FM. Aromatase inhibitors for ovulation induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:760–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruce IR, Samuel EB. A review of the physiology behind letrozole applications in infertility: are current protocols optimal? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:2093–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Quinn MM, Cakmak H, Letourneau JM, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:568–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Revelli A, Porcu E, Levi Setti PE, Delle Piane L, Merlo DF, Anserini P. Is letrozole needed for controlled ovarian stimulation in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:993–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oktay K, Hourvitz A, Sahin G, Oktem O, Safro B, Cil A, et al. Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3885–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weil S, Vendola K, Zhou J, Bondy CA. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:2951–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu YG, Bennett J, Talla D, Stocco C. Testosterone, not 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, stimulates LRH-1 leading to FSH-independent expression of Cyp19 and P450scc in granulosa cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25:656–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher TF, Molskness TA, Villeda A, Zelinski MB, Stouffer RL, Xu J. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin production by primate follicles during culture is a function of growth rate, gonadotrophin exposure and oxygen milieu. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(12):3263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hardy K, Fenwick M, Mora J, Laird M, Thomson K, Franks S. Onset and heterogeneity of responsiveness to FSH in mouse preantral follicles in culture. Endocrinology. 2017;158:134–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gabrielle White Wolf, PhD, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, South 1 West 16, 060-8543, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

    Fukiko Kasuga-Yamashita, Tsuyoshi Baba, Sachiko Nagao, Yuya Fujibe, Miyuki Morishita, Yoshika Kuno, Tasuku Mariya, Toshiaki Endo & Tsuyoshi Saito

  2. Sapporo ART Clinic, 1-2 North 7 West 4, 060-0807, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

    Hiroyuki Honnma

  3. Ena Asabu ART Clinic, 2-2-7 Asabu, 001-0045, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

    Tamotsu Kiya

Authors
  1. Fukiko Kasuga-Yamashita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tsuyoshi Baba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sachiko Nagao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuya Fujibe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miyuki Morishita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yoshika Kuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tasuku Mariya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hiroyuki Honnma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Toshiaki Endo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tamotsu Kiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tsuyoshi Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FKY provided contributions to follicle isolation and culture, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript drafting and critical revising. TB provided contributions to experimental design, data analysis and interpretation, and critical manuscript revising for important intellectual content. SN, YF, MM, YK, TM, HH, TE, TK and TS provided contributions to data analysis and interpretation and critical manuscript revising for important intellectual content. All authors have approved the final version and submission of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuyoshi Baba.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Mice were handled according to the guidelines provided by Sapporo Medical University and the Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the study protocols (approval number: 20–033).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasuga-Yamashita, F., Baba, T., Nagao, S. et al. Letrozole increases preantral follicle growth and decreases estradiol production without impairing follicle survival. J Ovarian Res 15, 136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01073-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01073-2

Keywords

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us