Skip to main content
Download PDF

The serum oestradiol/progesterone ratio on the day of OPU + 7, but not the day of OPU + 5, affects the rates of live birth in fresh blastocyst embryo transfer cycles

Journal of Ovarian Research volume 16, Article number: 4 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, the embryo ends its wandering time and begins the process of implantation into the uterine cavity on the seventh day after oocyte pick-up (OPU + 7), which is closer than OPU + 5 to the time of nidation. Therefore, measuring the oestradiol (E2)/progesterone (P) ratio on OPU + 7 may be helpful for predicting pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 2,257 women undergoing a follicular-phase depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol for in vitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment and fresh blastocyst embryo transfer cycles at a university-affiliated fertility center between January 2016 and April 2021. First, 2,257 women were split into two groups based on clinical pregnancy for analyzing the levels of E2 and P and the E2/P ratio on the day of OPU + 2, OPU + 5 and OPU + 7. And then 2,257 cycles were stratified into three groups based on E2/P ratio tertiles on OPU + 7: the low group (1.3–15.7 pg/ng), middle group (15.7–28.8 pg/ng), and high group (28.8–487.2 pg/ng). The threshold effect of the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 on live birth was investigated using a two-piecewise linear regression model and a smoothing function curve.

Results

The level of P in the clinical pregnancy group were lower than that in the nonclinical pregnancy group on both OPU + 2 and OPU + 7 (201.9 ± 71.6 ng/ml vs 213.1 ± 77.6 ng/ml, 89.5 ± 88.5 ng/ml vs 99.5 ± 94.9 ng/ml, P < 0.05). The E2/P ratio in the clinical pregnancy group were higher than that in the nonclinical pregnancy group on both OPU + 2 and OPU + 7 (8.4 ± 6.5 pg/ng vs 8.0 ± 6.8 pg/ng, 32.3 ± 38.5 pg/ng vs 25.2 ± 31.0 pg/ng, P < 0.01). The E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 was positively associated with positive hCG (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P < 0.0001), clinical pregnancy (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; P = 0.0067) and live birth (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; P < 0.001), and a nonlinear correlation was observed between the E2/P ratio and LBR on OPU + 7.

Conclusions

A higher E2/P ratio is associated with a higher LBR, but the E2/P ratio should be maintained within a suitable range.

Introduction

The window of implantation (WOI) is a limited timeframe in which the endometrium becomes receptive to the competent embryo for implantation. In a natural cycle, the WOI is open during the mid-luteal phase, which is driven by the sequential actions of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P). Notably, different definitions of the time of implantation in terms of the time of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) appearance in maternal urine have been used, and they include 8 to 10 days after ovulation [1], days 7–9 after the urine luteinizing hormone (LH) surge (LH + 7–9) [2], and day 7 after the urine or serum LH peak (LH + 7) [3, 4]. It appears that no consensus has been reached on the definition of WOI.

The levels of E2 and P in the luteal phase reflect luteal function. During in vitro fertilization (IVF), the rise in E2 and P to supraphysiological levels after multiple follicles develop can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes, and to maximize the live birth rate (LBR) of an IVF cycle, it is crucial to pinpoint the WOI day. In the available literature, the time of implantation is defined as the development of pinopodes on the sixth day after the serum LH peak (LH + 6), representing the adhesion of blastocysts to the luminal epithelium [5]; as the first detection of serum hCG on embryonic days 6.6 to 7.4 (around the seventh day after oocyte pick-up (OPU + 7)) after embryo transfer (ET) [6]; or as completion of the 5th day of progesterone treatment (P + 5) in the hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) cycle [7, 8]. In this context, it is noteworthy that there are controversies regarding which day of luteal E2 and P is most closely related to a high success rate in assisted reproduction. In our opinion, the day of OPU + 7 is closer to embryo implantation than the day of OPU + 5, therefore the levels of E2 or P maybe indicate a more favorable pregnancy outcome which there is a paucity of data concerning it.

To obtain data on the outcomes of women in terms of a live birth after IVF, we assessed the levels of sex hormones on OPU + 7, and then, to evaluate the influence of a significant change in the serum E2/P ratio on OPU + 7, we compared the effects of different E2/P ratios on pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and methods

Participants

We conducted a hospital-based cohort study. This investigation was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital, Hubei Medical University. Anonymous data were collected from the Reproductive Medicine Centre, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, between January 2016 and April 2021.

Patients who received the early-follicle-phase depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol were included. Patients were chosen if they satisfied all the following inclusion criteria: regular menstrual cycles ranging from 25 to 35 days; aged < 40 years; body mass index (BMI), 18–28 kg/m2; normal basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (< 10 mIU/ml) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) (≥ 1.1 ng/ml) levels determined on days 2–3 of the cycle prior to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), and blastocyst transfer. The following were the exclusion criteria: patients with metabolic disorders, ovulatory dysfunction, pelvic tuberculosis, congenital uterine malformations, chromosomal abnormalities or single-gene disorders, cardiovascular diseases, or tumors. The patients were stratified into three groups based on E2/P ratio tertiles on OPU + 7, namely, the low group (1.3–15.7 pg/ng), middle group (15.7–28.8 pg/ng), and high group (28.8–487.2 pg/ng). Followed-up was performed by communicating with the women by telephone until the pregnancy outcomes were known.

Ovarian stimulation

The patients received a single intramuscular injection of 3.75 mg long-acting triptorelin acetate (Decapeptyl; Ferring, SaintPrex, Switzerland) on day 2 or 3 of the cycle. After 30–42 days of downregulation, an ultrasound scan and serum concentration tests were performed, and the criteria were as follows: endometrial thickness ≤ 5 mm; follicles 5–7 mm; serum concentration of E2 < 50 pg/ml; P < 1 ng/ml; and LH < 1 mIU/ml. Recombinant LH (Luveris; Merck Serono) (75 IU per day) was added in the mid- and late-follicular stages to promote follicular development when the serum LH level was below 1.2 mIU/ml. Then, the treatment followed by gonadotropin (Gn) stimulation, the doses of urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG, Livzon Pharmaceutical, China) and recombinant FSH (Gonal-f, Merck Serono, Germany) were adjusted according to the growth trend of the follicles and serum hormone changes (150–450 IU per day). Recombinant hCG (Merck Serono, Italy) at a dose of 250 µg and urinary hCG (Livzon Pharmaceutical, China) at a dose of 1,000–2,000 IU were given to trigger oocyte maturation when two or more follicles reached preovulatory size (18–22 mm). We chose the trigger medication when multiple follicles were greater than 16 mm in size and according to the E2 levels as follows: when there were more than 10 follicles and the E2 level was greater than 2500 pg/ml, recombinant hCG was used alone; when there were more than 10 follicles or the E2 level was less than 2500 pg/ml, both recombinant hCG and urinary hCG 1,000 IU were used; when there were less than 10 follicles or the E2 level was less than 2500 pg/ml, both recombinant hCG and urinary hCG 2,000 IU were administered. Oocyte retrieval was done 36 h following the trigger. According to the standard insemination procedures used in the laboratory, all oocytes were inseminated using IVF or ICSI. Embryo scoring was conducted based on morphologic criteria; 6–8 cells with less than 20% fragmentation were considered to be good-quality embryos. On the fifth day after oocyte pick-up, ET was carried out with a soft catheter under transabdominal ultrasound guidance.

Luteal-phase support

After oocyte retrieval, luteal-phase support was initiated and continued daily until 3 months of gestation with the daily application of 90 mg vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone; Merck Serono) and either 10 mg twice or three times daily oral dydrogesterone (Duphaston, Abbott, USA), 2 mg twice daily oestradiol valerate tablets (Progynova, Berlin, Germany), or 1 mg:10 mg daily vaginal oestradiol and dydrogesterone tablets (Femoston, Abbott, USA). The good-quality spare embryos were cryopreserved through a vitrification protocol. Fresh ET cancellation and freeze-all strategies were implemented in cases of high P concentrations on hCG day (> 2 ng/ml) or to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We chose the luteal support medication according to the P and E2 levels on OPU + 2: when the E2 level was greater than 1000 pg/ml and the P level was greater than 100 ng/ml, Crinone was used alone; when the E2 level was greater than 1000 pg/ml and the P level was 50–100 ng/ml, both Crinone and dydrogesterone were used; when the E2 level was less than 1000 pg/ml and the P level was 50–100 ng/ml, Crinone and dydrogesterone plus Progynova were used; and when the E2 level was less than 500 pg/ml and the P level was less than 50 ng/ml, Crinone, dydrogesterone, Progynova and Femoston were used.

Hormone assays

We measured serum P and E2 levels, which represent luteal function, on OPU + 2, OPU + 5 and OPU + 7 using commercially available automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (UniCel® DxI 800 Access Immunoassy System, Beckman Coulter, USA and Access® Progesterone Calibrators, Access® Sensitive Estradiol Assay, Beckman Coulter, USA). Skilled technicians carried out all measurements in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. P had a detection threshold of 0.1 ng/ml, and the in-house inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 10 and 10%, respectively. E2 had a detection limit of 15.0 pg/ml, and the in-house inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 10 and 10%, respectively.

Outcome parameters

The outcome measures for patients with clinical and nonclinical pregnancy are presented first. Based on raw data on E2 and P levels throughout the early and mid-luteal stages individually, the E2/P ratio groups were identified.

In this study, the primary outcome was the LBR. The secondary outcomes were moderate or severe OHSS, hCG positivity, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy loss and preterm birth rates. Moderate or severe OHSS was diagnosed in women who fulfilled more than one of the following criteria: clinical ascites, hydrothorax, or dyspnoea (exertional or at rest) [9]. Biochemical pregnancy was defined as hCG > 10 mIU/ml 14 days after ET. Clinical pregnancy was defined as an intrauterine gestational sac identified by ultrasonography 30 days after ET. Early pregnancy loss was defined as spontaneous pregnancy loss before 12 weeks. Live birth was considered when a living fetus was born after 28 weeks of pregnancy.

Statistical methods

The statistical packages R (The R Foundation; http://www.r-project.org; version 3.6.1), EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com) and SPSS 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) were utilized for all analyses. One-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine the differences among groups, and continuous variables are shown as the mean with standard deviation or the median with interquartile range. Categorical variables were quantified as percentage-based figures and compared using either the Fisher's exact test or the Pearson chi-square test. Statistical significance was accepted as a two-sided P value < 0.05. Graphs were generated by using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software).

A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess significant relationships between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and pregnancy outcomes. The variables that indicated significance in the univariate analysis at P < 0.10 or more and those that might have an influence on live birth were included in the multivariable model. The GraphPad program was used to generate a spline curve by plotting the trends between pregnancy outcomes and various hormone levels.

Smooth curve fitting models were created using EmpowerStats software and R-project (version 3.6.1) in order to further analyze the substantial relationships between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and pregnancy outcomes. A two-piecewise linear regression model was also used to assess the threshold effect of the influencing factors on live birth using a smoothing function curve. The inflection point is obtained by recursive algorithm. Additionally, the one-line linear regression model and the two-piecewise linear regression model were also compared using a log-likelihood ratio test, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the threshold turning points of the independent influencing factors were computed before and after. The relationship was then further examined using model observation data, and ultimately, the chance of a live birth was properly examined using data obtained before and after each independent influencing factor's threshold inflection point.

Results

Luteal hormone profiles on OPU + 2, OPU + 5 and OPU + 7 of patients with clinical pregnancy and nonclinical pregnancy

The mean (± SD) patient age in this study population was 29.6 ± 3.5 years (range 18–41). After ET, 2,257 cycles (1,879 conventional IVF and 378 ICSI) produced a total of 1,606 clinical pregnancies, for a clinical pregnancy rate of 71.2%. Stratified by diagnostic classification, 1,483 patients had pelvic and tubal diseases (65.7%), 90 had endometriosis (4.0%), 470 had male factor infertility (20.8%), and 214 had unexplained infertility (9.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1 The baseline characteristics of the patients and the ovarian stimulation characteristics and embryological outcomes of the patients with different serum E2/P ratios on OPU + 7
Full size table

2,257 women who were utilizing the depot GnRH-a regimen and were split into two groups based on clinical pregnancy made up the eligible cohort. There were significant differences in BMI, AFC, trigger dosage, the moderate or severe OHSS rate, number of transferred embryos, E2 and P on hCG day, P and the E2/P ratio on OPU + 2, and P and E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 between the two groups (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 1), and the difference in the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 was especially notable (32.3 pg/ng vs. 25.2 pg/ng, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). There was no significant difference in female age, AMH, infertility duration, infertility type, infertility factors, fertilization method, dosage and duration of Gn, endometrial thickness on hCG day, number of oocytes retrieved, the good-quality embryo rate or luteal support medication between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The levels of E2 and P and the E2/P ratio on OPU + 2, OPU + 5 and OPU + 7 between the groups with clinical pregnancy and nonclinical pregnancy

Full size image

According to Fig. 1, the level of P in the clinical pregnancy group was lower than that in the nonclinical pregnancy group (201.9 ng/ml vs. 213.1 ng/ml, P = 0.001), and the E2/P ratio was higher than that in the nonclinical pregnancy group on OPU + 2 (8.4 pg/ng vs. 8.0 pg/ng, P = 0.003). The levels of E2 and P and the E2/P ratio on OPU + 5 were all higher than those on OPU + 2. On OPU + 7, the levels of E2 and P were lower than those on OPU + 5, but the E2/P ratio was higher than that on OPU + 5. Our study also revealed that the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 in the clinical pregnancy group was higher than that in the nonclinical pregnancy group (32.3 pg/ng vs. 25.2 pg/ng), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

The baseline characteristics of patients, the ovarian stimulation characteristics and embryological outcomes of patients with different serum E2/P ratios on OPU + 7

The E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 was used to classify all patients into three groups. BMI, AMH, AFC, and infertility factors among the three groups were significantly different. (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Female age, infertility duration, infertility type and fertilization method did not significantly differ among the groups. (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

The ovarian stimulation characteristics and embryological outcomes of the three groups are also presented in Table 1. There were significant differences in the dosage and duration of Gn, number of oocytes retrieved, good-quality embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, number of transferred embryos, trigger dosage and luteal support medication among the three groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness on hCG day or the fertilization rate (P > 0.05).

Pregnancy outcomes of patients with different serum E2/P ratios on OPU + 7

The pregnancy outcomes, stratified into three groups by the serum E2/P ratio tertiles on OPU + 7, are presented in Table 2. There was no significant difference in the ectopic pregnancy rate, early, mid- or late-term pregnancy loss rate, preterm birth rate or number of fetuses delivered by one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the positive hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate and LBR (P < 0.01) (Table 2). The LBRs in the three groups were 56.4%, 61.8% and 69.1% (P < 0.001), respectively. The positive hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate and LBR all appeared to be significantly higher in the high-ratio group than in the low-ratio group (82.5% vs. 73.4%, 76.4% vs. 66.8%, 69.1% vs. 56.4%, P < 0.001).

Table 2 Reproductive outcomes of women with different serum E2/P ratios on OPU + 7
Full size table

To accounting for potential confounders, multivariable regression analysis was used. After controlling for female age, BMI, AMH, AFC, infertility duration, infertility type, infertility factors, fertilization method, administration on trigger day, luteal support, number of transferred embryos and the moderate or severe OHSS rate, the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 was positively associated with positive hCG (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01–1.02; P < 0.0001), clinical pregnancy (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; P = 0.0067) and live birth (adjusted OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; P < 0.001) (Table 3). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the ectopic pregnancy rate, early, mid- or late-term pregnancy loss rate, preterm birth rate or number of fetuses delivered after multivariable regression analysis (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Analysis of the correlation between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and pregnancy outcomes using multivariable regression analysis
Full size table

A nonlinear association between the E2/P ratio and pregnancy outcome was revealed by the adjusted smooth curve fit. Specifically, the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 had a positive correlation with clinical pregnancy and live birth. Further threshold impact research was needed, nevertheless, as these variables did not have a simple linear relationship (Fig. 2). Thus, threshold saturation effect analysis of the association between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and clinical pregnancy or live birth was performed. The logarithmic likelihood ratio test showed that the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 had a curvilinear association with clinical pregnancy and live birth and that there were two separate points (K1 = 78.09, K2 = 76.97) (P < 0.05). When the E2/P ratio was < 78.09 pg/ng (K1 < 78.09), it was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, P < 0.001). Conversely, there was no correlation between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and clinical pregnancy rate when the E2/P ratio was > 78.09 pg/ng (K1 > 78.09) (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.01, P = 0.94). Additionally, when the E2/P ratio was < 76.97 pg/ng (K2 < 76.97), it was positively correlated with live birth (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01–1.02, P < 0.001). Conversely, there was no correlation between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and LBR when the E2/P ratio was > 76.97 pg/ng (K1 > 76.97) (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00–1.00, P = 0.89) (Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The correlation between the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. A threshold, nonlinear association between pregnancy outcomes and the E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 day was found in a generalized additive model (GAM). The smooth curve fit between variables is represented by the solid red line. The 95% confidence interval from the fit is represented by blue bands. All estimates are adjusted for female age, BMI, AMH, AFC, infertility duration, infertility type, infertility factors, fertilization method, administration on trigger day, luteal support, number of transferred embryos and moderate or severe OHSS rate. E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; OPU, oocyte pick-up

Full size image

Discussion

This study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to unequivocally show that the serum E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 which maybe is the day closest to the time of embryo implantation, but not OPU + 5, the day of blastocyst transfer, can be regarded as an indicator for higher LBR after IVF treatment.

Multiple studies evaluated a mean time interval of 33.91 h between the onset of the LH surge and ovulation [10] and found that the seventh day after the onset of the LH surge (LH + 7) is crucial for embryo implantation. It is noteworthy that the moment of ovulation in the natural cycle is equivalent to the time of OPU in IVF, and LH + 7 is equal to day 7 after hCG administration (around OPU + 5.5 and the day of blastocyst transfer). In this investigation, our hypothesis is that the levels of sex hormones on OPU + 7 could presage successful nidation of embryos because the embryos end their wandering time and are in the process of implantation in the uterine cavity.

During normal pregnancy, maternal plasma E2 levels dramatically increase from the luteal phase to the end of pregnancy. Two trials, which specifically included women on the day of ET, showed no effect of luteal E2 on reproductive outcomes [11, 12]. However, in previous trials involving women with higher E2 levels from OPU + 6 to OPU + 7, although the threshold value of the E2 level is nonuniform [13, 14] and variable in the daytime [15], the ongoing pregnancy rate after ET during the IVF cycle was superior to that in patients with lower E2 levels in the IVF cycle due to the possibility that E2 activation may result in angiogenic and vasodilative changes that affect implantation and regulate fetoplacental blood flow [16]. Otherwise, persistently low levels of E2 may have detrimental effects on placentation, therefore resulting in preeclampsia [17]. We found no differences in E2 levels in the luteal phase on OPU + 2, OPU + 5 and OPU + 7 between pregnant and nonpregnant women. It appears that a reasonably steady E2 level is linked to healthy corpus luteum activity, making it ineffective to predict endometrial receptivity from a single luteal E2 measurement.

The attainment of decidualization and embryo-endometrial adhesion for successful implantation are related to adequate P levels. In an intrauterine insemination trial, the mid-luteal P concentration could predict treatment failure after COH when it was lower than 25 nmol/L on the 7th day after the hCG trigger (hCG + 7) [18]. Using mifepristone, a progesterone receptor modulator, altered the transcriptome associated with endometrial receptivity on day 2 after the uterine LH surge (LH + 2) renders the endometrium nonreceptive on LH + 7 [19]. These results are consistent with the importance of mid-luteal P. It is interesting to note that the peak P concentrations between 10 and 15 ng/ml in urine that occur from LH + 7 to LH + 9 appear to be sufficient to induce endometrial receptivity [20], and the maximum pregnancy rate is achieved with serum luteal P levels of 150–250 nmol/l on OPU + 5 in fresh IVF cycles [21]. Therefore, serum P levels that are too low or too high in the mid-luteal phase might reduce the likelihood of a live birth. In addition, these studies focused on the time before nidation, rather than on OPU + 7, which might be closer to the WOI. In our trial, the results favor the use of the serum E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 for predicting a higher LBR; specifically, the results suggest that when the E2 level remains steady, it is better to maintain a relatively low P level, as a higher P level does not improve the outcome.

The corpus luteum produces E2 and P, which are affected on OPU + 5 by the various combinations and variable doses of trigger administration and the luteal-phase support medication [22], and luteal function might be reflected by the rate of moderate or severe OHSS and pregnancy loss [23]. Regarding the above considerations, adjustments were made for these variables in our trial, and we found that in a proper range (when the E2/P ratio was < 76.97 pg/ng), the serum E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 was positively related with the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth.

The findings of this study on mid-luteal steroid levels on OPU + 7 will be helpful for achieving a successful pregnancy and live birth. The key strengths of this study include a unified stimulation protocol that rules out the impacts of different protocols and a focus on blastocyst transfer so that the influence of embryos at different stages of pregnancy outcomes would be eliminated. Our study has several limitations. We did not have data on embryo aneuploidy, so we could not exclude the impact of aneuploidy on reducing the possibility of conception or on the serum hCG concentration on OPU + 7 to clearly evaluate whether the secretion of placental villi after embryo implantation causes hormone fluctuations. In addition, the number of patients on OPU + 5 was very small. Thus, the results may not be widely applicable to women with all stimulation protocols or frozen ET cycles. In the recent years of research, psychological variables of couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology [24], cryptic sperm defects [25], intrauterine injections of embryo culture supernatant before embryo transfer [26] and Inositol used during ovulation promotion [27,28,29,30] have also been found to have effect on pregnancy outcomes, we also believe that more relevant variables should be introduced into the further study.

Conclusion

A higher E2/P ratio on OPU + 7 in fresh blastocyst transfer cycles is associated with better pregnancy outcomes, but it should be maintained within a suitable range. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to examine how to optimize the individual luteal-phase support and determine the optimum starting time for luteal support.

Availability of data and material

All data presented in this study are available upon request upon contact with the corresponding author.

References

  1. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1796–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Suhorutshenko M, Kukushkina V, Velthut-Meikas A, Altmae S, Peters M, Magi R, Krjutskov K, Koel M, Codoner FM, Martinez-Blanch JF, et al. Endometrial receptivity revisited: endometrial transcriptome adjusted for tissue cellular heterogeneity. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:2074–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alama P, Pellicer A, Simon C. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(50–60):60.e51-15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang WB, Li Q, Liu H, Chen WJ, Zhang CL, Li H, Lu X, Chen JL, Li L, Wu H, Sun XX. Transcriptomic analysis of endometrial receptivity for a genomic diagnostics model of Chinese women. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:157–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acosta AA, Elberger L, Borghi M, Calamera JC, Chemes H, Doncel GF, Kliman H, Lema B, Lustig L, Papier S. Endometrial dating and determination of the window of implantation in healthy fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:788–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergh PA, Navot D. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:537–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Gomez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simon C. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:818–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Enciso M, Carrascosa JP, Sarasa J, Martinez-Ortiz PA, Munne S, Horcajadas JA, Aizpurua J. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:220–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:249–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Erden M, Mumusoglu S, Polat M, YaraliOzbek I, Esteves SC, Humaidan P, Yarali H. The LH surge and ovulation re-visited: a systematic review and meta-analysis and implications for true natural cycle frozen thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28(5):717–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Serum estradiol/progesterone ratio on day of embryo transfer may predict reproductive outcome following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization Petersen JF, Andersen AN, Klein BM, Helmgaard L, Arce JC. Luteal phase progesterone and oestradiol after ovarian stimulation: relation to response and prediction of pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online 2018;36:427–34.

  12. Gruber I, Just A, Birner M, Lösch A. Serum estradiol/progesterone ratio on day of embryo transfer may predict reproductive outcome following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2007;4:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedler S, Zimerman A, Schachter M, Raziel A, Strassburger D, El Ron R. The midluteal decline in serum estradiol levels is drastic but not deleterious for implantation after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients with normal or high responses. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vanderlelie J, Bell K, Perkins AV. The serum concentration of estradiol after embryo transfer and the decline from preovulatory levels may influence the success of IVF treatment. Horm Res. 2003;59:95–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. Daytime Variation in Serum Progesterone During the Mid-Luteal Phase in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berkane N, Liere P, Oudinet JP, Hertig A, Lefèvre G, Pluchino N, Schumacher M, Chabbert-Buffet N. From pregnancy to preeclampsia: a key role for estrogens. Endocr Rev. 2017;38:123–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pereira MM, Mainigi M, Strauss JF. Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:651–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Costello MF, Emerson S, Lukic J, Sjoblom P, Garrett D, Hughes G, Steigrad S. Predictive value of mid luteal progesterone concentration before luteal support in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:51–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. von Grothusen C, Lalitkumar PG, Ruiz-Alonso M, Boggavarapu NR, Navarro R, Miravet-Valenciano J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Simon C. Effect of mifepristone on the transcriptomic signature of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1889–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Suthaporn S, Jayaprakasan K, Thornton J, Walker K, Medrano JH, Castellanos M, May S, Polanski L, Raine-Fenning N, Maalouf WE. Suboptimal mid-luteal progesterone concentrations are associated with aberrant endometrial gene expression, potentially resulting in implantation failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42:595–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Erb K, Bungum L, Pedersen D, Hauge B, Elbaek HO, Povlsen BB, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. The impact of luteal serum progesterone levels on live birth rates-a prospective study of 602 IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1506–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fatemi HM, Polyzos NP, van Vaerenbergh I, Bourgain C, Blockeel C, Alsbjerg B, Papanikolaou EG, Humaidan P. Early luteal phase endocrine profile is affected by the mode of triggering final oocyte maturation and the luteal phase support used in recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone-gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:742–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:Cd009154.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burgio S, Polizzi C, Buzzaccarini G, Lagana AS, Gullo G, Perricone G, Perino A, Cucinella G, Alesi M. Psychological variables in medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Prz Menopauzalny. 2022;21:47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goudakou M, Kalogeraki A, Matalliotakis I, Panagiotidis Y, Gullo G, Prapas Y. Cryptic sperm defects may be the cause for total fertilization failure in oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prapas Y, Petousis S, Panagiotidis Y, Gullo G, Kasapi L, Papadeothodorou A, Prapas N. Injection of embryo culture supernatant to the endometrial cavity does not affect outcomes in IVF/ICSI or oocyte donation cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:169–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gullo G, Carlomagno G, Unfer V, D’Anna R. Myo-inositol: from induction of ovulation to menopausal disorder management. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67:485–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D’Anna R, Santamaria A, Giorgianni G, Vaiarelli A, Gullo G, Di Bari F, Benvenga S. Myo-inositol and melatonin in the menopausal transition. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33:279–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. BezerraEspinola MS, Lagana AS, Bilotta G, Gullo G, Aragona C, Unfer V. D-chiro-inositol induces ovulation in Non-Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), non-insulin-resistant young women, likely by modulating aromatase expression: a report of 2 cases. Am J Case Rep. 2021;22:e932722.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D’Anna R, Corrado F, Loddo S, Gullo G, Giunta L, Di Benedetto A. Myoinositol plus alpha-lactalbumin supplementation, insulin resistance and birth outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled study. Sci Rep. 2021;11:8866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank these women who taken part in this study and all the staff at the Reproductive Medical Centre, Renmin Hospital, Hubei Medical University.

Funding

This project was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82101726), the Innovation Group of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2020CFA021), the Scientific Technological Project of Shiyan City of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2021K64), the Principal Investigator Grant of Biomedical Research Institute of Hubei University of Medicine (Grant No. HBMUPI201802), the Hubei Provincial health and health commission funded projects (Grant No. WJ2021M052), the Open Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Wudang Local Chinese Medicine Research (Hubei University of Medicine) (Grant No.WDCM2022016 and No. WDCM2020003), and the Innovative Research Program for Graduates of Hubei University of Medicine (Grant No. YC2021029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Centre, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Wenxian Zhao, Honglu Diao, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Shengfang Jiang, Changjun Zhang & Ying Zhang

  2. Hubei Clinical Research Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Wenxian Zhao, Honglu Diao, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Shengfang Jiang, Changjun Zhang & Ying Zhang

  3. Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Honglu Diao, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Shengfang Jiang, Changjun Zhang & Ying Zhang

  4. Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Honglu Diao, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Shengfang Jiang, Changjun Zhang & Ying Zhang

  5. Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Honglu Diao, Xin Chen, Shaoyuan Xu, Shengfang Jiang, Changjun Zhang & Ying Zhang

  6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People’s Republic of China

    Hong Cao

Authors
  1. Wenxian Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Honglu Diao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaoyuan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shengfang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hong Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Changjun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.Z. supervised the entire study, including the procedures, conception, design and completion. W.X.Z. drafted the article and analyzed the data. X.C., S.Y.X., S.F.J. and H.C. were responsible for the collection of data. H.L.D. and C.J.Z. revised the article. W.X.Z. and Y.Z. approved the final article. Y.Z. participated in the interpretation of the study data and in revisions to the article. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changjun Zhang or Ying Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to partcipate

This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital, Hubei Medical University (No: syrmyy2022-049).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Luteal hormone profiles at different time points between clinical pregnancy and nonclinical pregnancy patients.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2.

Analysis of the threshold saturation effect between the E2/P ratio on OPU+7 and pregnancy outcomes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, W., Diao, H., Chen, X. et al. The serum oestradiol/progesterone ratio on the day of OPU + 7, but not the day of OPU + 5, affects the rates of live birth in fresh blastocyst embryo transfer cycles. J Ovarian Res 16, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01096-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-023-01096-3

Keywords

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us