Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Metformin improves ovarian follicle dynamics by reducing theca cell proliferation and CYP-17 expression in an androgenized rat model

  • Roberta Rassi Mahamed1, 2,
  • Carla Cristina Maganhin2Email author,
  • Gisela Rodrigues Silva Sasso3,
  • Manuel de Jesus Simões3,
  • Maria Candida Pinheiro Baracat2,
  • Edmund Chada Baracat2 and
  • José Maria Soares-Jr2
Journal of Ovarian Research201811:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0392-1

Received: 16 October 2017

Accepted: 25 February 2018

Published: 1 March 2018

Abstract

Background

Metformin influences insulin receptor signaling, which might interfere with the proliferation of ovarian follicular structures and steroidogenesis. We hypothesize that reductions in glucose and insulin levels might interfere with CYP-17 expression and histomorphological changes in an androgenized rat model. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of metformin on CYP-17 expression, follicular dynamics, and proliferative parameters in neonatally androgenized female rats.

Methods

Thirty-six newborn rats were randomly allocated to the following three groups on the third day of life: control (CG, n = 12), androgenized (GA, n = 12), and androgenized + metformin (GAmet, n = 12). The GA and GAmet animals were administered 0.1 mL of testosterone propionate (1.25 mg/animal) diluted in castor oil (vehicle) in a single dose; the CG rats received a subcutaneous injection of the vehicle in the dorsum. After 90 days, gavage treatment was initiated, distilled water was administered to the CG and GA rats, and metformin (150 mg/kg) was administered to the GAmet animals. The treatment was administered daily for six weeks. Following anesthesia, blood was drawn for biochemical measurements, and the ovaries were removed for histological and immunohistochemical analyses of Ki67, VEGFA and CYP17 expression. The glucose and insulin levels were also measured.

Results

The comparison of the GA and GAmet animals revealed that metformin decreased the weight as well as the glucose and insulin levels, slowed the proliferation of the theca interna and interstitial cells, as evidenced by Ki-67 and VEGF-A expression, and diminished CYP17 expression in the analyzed ovarian structures. In addition, metformin reduced the number of degenerating follicles and interstitial cells and improved angiogenesis.

Conclusion

Metformin improves the carbohydrate metabolism, reduces proliferation, and decreases CYP-17 expression in the follicular structures of androgenized rats.

Keywords

MetforminSteroidogenesisOvaryRat

Background

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age, but its etiology remains unclear. PCOS might have multiple causes, and one possible cause might be related to its association with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance [1]. The genesis and pathophysiology of these changes are known to be related to hyperandrogenism [2]. Hyperinsulinemic insulin resistance acts indirectly on oocyte competence and oocyte quality, increasing the production of ovarian androgens and decreasing the synthesis of hepatic sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) [3].

In PCOS, insulin sensitivity is thought to regulate the expression of glucose transporters in granulosa cells by reducing glucose uptake within the oocyte, thereby also reducing the resources available for energy metabolism [3].The insulin receptor sensitizer substance acts as an intracellular second messenger, regulating the activities of insulin and glucose metabolism and transport [4] and decreasing hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance in PCOS women [5].However, the exact mechanisms through which an increase in androgen levels leads to ovulation disorder are not yet fully understood. Therefore, the use of animal models is important to better understand the actions involved [6].

Several animal models, including nonhuman primates, sheep, and rodents, have been established to study PCOS. However, a whole-animal model that mimics all the features associated with human PCOS has not yet been established [6, 7].An injection of testosterone propionate, if administered during the first days of life in rats, leads to a state of permanent estrus and keeps the vagina from opening, which might indicate a reduction or absence of ovulation due to hormonal dysfunction [8].This method is used to assess the effects of androgens on follicular physiology [9] and changes in carbohydrate metabolism [1]. High testosterone doses increase the serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1, inducing insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia, which produce a metabolic disturbance [10].The effects of this method during the first days of life in an animal model are likely due to epigenetic modifications.

The ovarian CYP complexes are important for ovarian steroidogenesis. The CYP17a1 and CYP11a1 genes encode 17-α hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase, respectively, two key enzymes involved in the synthesis and metabolism of androgens as well as the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme, P450 [10]. The end result is pregnenolone conversion into androgen, primarily in the theca interna [11].The induction of permanent estrus through insulin administration increases CYP17 expression and serum androgen levels in female rats and results in the breakdown of the estrous cycle [12]. In our previous work [8], we demonstrated that our PCOS rat model exhibited elevated insulin levels, which could explain the permanent cycle and the increase in androgen production [12]. However, there are scarce data regarding the ability of metformin to reverse this effect because previous studies primarily demonstrated the effect of the drug on weight and the glucose/insulin ratio [8].

In rats, metformin improves ovarian function in animals with permanent androgen-induced estrus [1315]. In our previous studies, the percentage of neonatally androgenized rats with PCOS was approximately 50 and 10% become pregnant after metformin treatment. The reason that fertility was restored in such a small number of animals might be related to the disruption of ovarian activity or to endometrial abnormalities. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the effects of metformin on the follicular dynamics, CYP-17 expression and proliferation parameters in neonatally androgenized female rats.

Methods

Virgin adult female albino EPM-1-Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus) aged 90 to 120 days from the Center for the Development of Experimental Models (CEDEME, UNIFESP-EPM), Federal University of São Paulo – Paulista School of Medicine (UNIFESP-EPM), were used in this study and handled according to ethical principles for experiments. This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board of UNIFESP-EPM (No. 0351/11).

The animals were transported to and housed in the animal laboratory of the Division of Histology and Structural Biology, Morphology Department, UNIFESP-EPM, where they were confined to plastic cages with metal grids. The animals were administered standard rations (Labina-Purina) and water ad libitum and were maintained at a room temperature of 21 °C to 25°Cand a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) with artificial lighting from fluorescent lamps (40-watt daylight model).

After acclimatization for approximately 15 days, the animals were grouped for mating: two female rats for each male rat. Each group was placed and housed in a cage from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. without water or food. The following morning, the mating test developed by Hamilton and Wolfe [16], which is based on the presence or absence of sperm in the vagina of the female rats, was performed. If positive, the test day was regarded as the beginning of pregnancy (first day).

Following parturition, newborn rats were separated by sex on the third day of life according to the anogenital distance [17]. Thirty-six newborn female rats were selected and housed together with their mothers, but the male newborns were euthanized. On the third day of life, 24 female newborns were administered 0.1 mL of testosterone propionate diluted in castor oil (vehicle) (1.25 mg/animal) via the dorsal subcutaneous route by inserting the needle from the dorsal region to the cervical region [8, 18]. The remaining 12 newborn female rats constituted the control group and received only vehicle.

All female newborns were housed together with their mothers while nursing (30 days) under the environmental conditions described above. After this period of nursing, the animals were separated into groups of four rats per cage. After 90 days, a vaginal smear was collected from each animal on four consecutive days. The testosterone propionate-treated animals exhibited a closed vagina, and their vaginal smear test demonstrated that they were in permanent estrus [18, 19].

The animals were allocated to the following groups: control group (CG), 12 female rats that received no medication and only 0.5 mL of distilled water by oral gavage for six consecutive weeks; androgenized group (GA), 12 female rats in permanent estrus that were treated with testosterone propionate and 0.5 mL of distilled water by oral gavage for six consecutive weeks; and androgenized + metformin group (GAmet), 12 female rats in permanent estrus that were administered testosterone propionate followed by metformin by oral gavage for six consecutive weeks. A total of 36 animals were used in this study.

All GAmet animals were weighed before and after the metformin treatment. The medication, 150 mg/kg of metformin [7] prepared in diluted water, was introduced into the stomach of each animal by gavage with a gastric catheter [20]. The dose of metformin was determined based on previous studies [8, 20].Vaginal smears were collected from the GAmet animals [21] daily for six weeks, starting on the first day of metformin use, to characterize the estrous cycle. Afterward, the animals in the control group were sacrificed during the proestrus phase, and the GAmet animals were sacrificed at the time of vaginal opening and proestrus phase. The other animals were sacrificed at any time after the treatment because it was impossible to collect vaginal smears.

Prior to sacrifice, the female rats were fasted for 12 h and then intraperitoneally anesthetized with 15 mg/kg Xylazine (Rompun®; Bayer, Brazil) and 30 mg/kg Ketamine (Ketalar®; Pfizer, Brazil). Each animal was immobilized on a cork board. The thoracic wall was then opened with a xiphopubic incision of the wall for intracardiac collection of blood for the insulin and fasting glucose measurements and removal of both ovaries. The ovaries were immersed in 10% formaldehyde for fixation and subsequent histologic processing using the methodology described by Michalany [22].

Insulin and glucose measurements

The fasting glucose levels were measured using the hexokinase enzymatic method, and the insulin levels were measured using the Coat-A-Count (Diagnostic Products Corporation, LA, USA) method according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The test was performed using a solid-phase radioimmunoassay with iodine 1251 for quantitative measurement of the serum insulin levels. The inter-assay precision was approximately 10.2% (coefficient of variation), and the intra-assay precision was approximately 6.5% (coefficient of variation). The assay sensitivity was 4.2 micro IU/mL [23].

Glucose/insulin ratio calculation

The glucose/insulin ratio was calculated using the following formula: fasting glucose (ng/mL)/fasting insulin (ng/mL) X 10 [7].

For the calculations, the unit of glucose was converted from mg/dL to ng/mL.

Morphological analysis

The ovaries from each animal were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde for 24 h, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol, cleared in xylol, and embedded in liquid paraffin in a 60 °C oven using the methodology described by Michalany [22]. Subsequently, the blocks were cut into 4-μm sections with a Leica microtome. The sections were placed on slides and incubated in a 37 °C oven for 24 h. The slides were then stained with hematoxylin-eosin and mounted in Entellan for histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analyses.

Histomorphometric analysis

Histomorphometry was conducted using a computer coupled to a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weesp, The Netherlands) and a high-resolution camera (AxioCam MRC, Carl Zeiss). The Vision REL 4.6 (Carl Zeiss) image analyzer program was used [24, 25]. Measurements were collected using the Image lab-Softium™ software program (São Paulo, Brazil).

Ten measurements from each slide were collected for each animal. The ovaries were included, and sections were cut from the central region to the outer boundary. The structures of interest were measured in microns. Histological quantification encompassed the following items: (1) thickness of the surface epithelium (μm); (2) number of antral follicles (No./10 fields); (3) number of non-antral follicles (No./10 fields); (4) number of degenerating follicles (No./10 fields); (5) number of corpora lutea (No./10 fields); and (6) number of interstitial cells (No./area of 780 μm2).

The follicles were counted and classified according to previously established criteria [2628]. Two independent histologists who were blinded to the groups counted the follicles.

The ovarian follicles were divided into three categories: non-antral, antral, and degenerating. The corpora lutea were also counted.

Non-antral follicles were defined by the absence of the antral cavity and characterized as primordial, primary, secondary, or tertiary follicles [29]. The primordial follicle exhibited a layer of squamous cells surrounding the oocyte. The primary follicle exhibited an oocyte surrounded by a layer of cuboidal granulosa cells. The secondary follicle exhibited two to eight layers of granulosa cells and no antral cavity surrounding the oocyte. Tertiary follicles displayed more than eight layers of granulosa cells and lacked an antral cavity [27].

The follicles with an antral cavity, regardless of their size, were considered antral follicles. The degenerating follicles exhibited pyknotic nuclei in the granulosa layer, according to the categorization reported by Pedersen and Peters [26]. The corpus lutea exhibited characteristic luteal cells with a voluminous nucleus and vessels [30]. Two observers who were blinded to the groups separately collected the histomorphometric measurements.

Immunohistochemical analysis of the ovaries

The histological tissue sections were fixed in buffered 10% formaldehyde for 24 h and then embedded in paraffin. Sections with a thickness of 3 μm were cut on a Minot-like microtome and placed on slides that had previously been treated with 5% silane. The sections were subsequently incubated overnight in a solution with the following antibodies: (1) anti-Ki67(1:200; Spring Bioscience Corp.; [SP6]; M3060); (2) anti-VEGFA (1:200; Spring Bioscience Corp.; [SP28]; M3281), and (3) anti-CYP17A1 (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; [C-17]; SC-46081). The sections were then incubated with a secondary antibody and a Dako kit (Dako LSAB + Sys, Peroxidase Universal K0690–1). The sections were then washed and incubated with a freshly prepared streptavidin-biotin immunoperoxidase solution (LSAB Dako kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing, the bound enzyme was visualized after an additional incubation with the enzyme in the presence of 1% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Dako K3468–1). The negative control consisted of incubation with non-specific goat antibodies at the same concentration as the primary antibody for each immunohistochemical reaction (Ki67, VEGF and CYP17A1). All the sections were also stained with hematoxylin.

Using the protocol reported by Panzan et al. [31], the results were categorized by applying a scoring system based on the intensity of the reactions and the frequency of stained cells. The presence of a brownish color in the tissue was adopted as a positive reaction (i.e., binding of the antigen to the primary antibody). Immunoexpression was evaluated at 400× magnification using the semiquantitative method.

The percentages of stained epithelial cells were graded as follows: 0% (grade 0), 1 to 25% (grade 1), 26 to 50% (grade 2), 51 to 75% (grade 3), and 76 to 100% (grade 4) of the cells in a representative area. The intensity of the immunoreactions was scored as negative (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or strong/intense (3). The sections with no staining were deemed negative. The total index was calculated using the following formula: Total index = percentage of immunopositive cells x immunoreaction intensity. The results are expressed as scores ranging from 0 to 12.

The expression of Ki67 antigen was determined as a percentage (%) of positively stained cells. In all cases, at least 500 cells in a 100-μm2 area were counted per animal. The investigators were blinded to the group allocation.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations (M ± SD). The statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0® (GraphPad Software Inc.) software. The distribution of the data was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If the distribution was normal, the data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, a procedure for analyzing variables with multiple comparisons. However, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn post hoc test were employed to analyze the immunohistochemical data, which did not exhibit a normal distribution. Additionally, the correlations of the glucose/insulin ratio and weight with the CYP17 data of the glucose level with the weight were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Statistical significance was attained if the p-value was less than 0.05 (α < 5%).

Results

The fasting glucose levels, insulin levels, glucose/insulin ratio, animals’ weights, and Spearman correlation between glucose levels and weight are presented in Fig. 1.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Weight measurements and biochemical analysis. a Weight of the rats in the following groups: CG (control group), GA (androgen group), and GAmet (metformin group). p = 0.049 (ANOVA and Tukey’s test). b GA rats exhibited the highest glucose values, *p = 0.038 (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests). c The insulin levels of the GA group were higher than those of the other groups, p < 0.01(Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests). d The lowest glucose/insulin ratio was observed in the GA group, * p < 0.01. e Spearman rank test of the correlation of glucose with weight in CG rats (no significant correlation). f Spearman rank test of the correlation of glucose with weight in GA rats (no significant correlation). g Spearman rank test of the correlation of glucose with weight in GAmet rats (no significant correlation)

The GA rats presented higher glucose and insulin levels and increased weight compared with the rats in the CG and GAmet groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1a, b, and c). Additionally, compared with the other groups, the GA rats exhibited the lowest G/I ratio (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1d). No correlation between the weight data and glucose levels was identified using the Spearman test (Fig. 1e, f, g).

The histomorphometric data for the ovaries (Table 1) showed that the GA rats have greater quantities of degenerating follicles and interstitial cells than the CG or GAmet rats (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the non-antral and antral follicles or in the thickness of the ovarian surface epithelium among the three study groups. Nevertheless, an absence of corpora lutea was observed in the GA rats, and the GAmet rats had fewer corpora lutea than the CG rats (p < 0.01, Table 1).
Table 1

Ovary histomorphometry and VEGFA, Ki67 and CYP17 immunohistochemical data of the study groups

Variable

CG (n = 12)

GA (n = 12)

GAmet (n = 12)

Degenerating follicles

(No./slide)

4.11 ± 1.07

5.87 ± 1.87*

3.10 ± 1.10

Corpora lutea (No./10 fields)

8.26 ± 2.81**

3.06 ± 1.32

Non-antral follicles

(No./10 fields)

3.23 ± 1.41

5.98 ± 3.88

3.77 ± 2.80

Antral follicles (No./fields)

1.97 ± 1.87

2.89 ± 1.89

2.98 ± 1.95

Interstitial cells

(No./780-μm2 area)

162.29 ± 23.21

313.18 ± 26.38*

172.45 ± 37.85

Epithelial thickness (μm)

8.28 ± 0.10

8.59 ± 0.19

8.30 ± 0.15

VEGFA (index)

 Granulosa cells

2.6 ± 0.2

9.6 ± 0.3*

4.2 ± 0.6

 Theca interna cells

3.8 ± 0.2

10.7 ± 0.6*

5.1 ± 0.2

 Interstitial cells

2.6 ± 1.6

9.3 ± 0.3*

4.2 ± 0.2

Ki67 (%)

 Granulosa cells

32.0 ± 4.4

14.0 ± 3.3*

28.1 ± 2.5

 Theca interna cells

16.0 ± 2.2

34.0 ± 1.5*

18.0 ± 3.1

 Interstitial cells

1.2 ± 0.1

8.0 ± 0.3*

1.1 ± 0.4

CYP17 (%)

 Granulosa cells

1.1 ± 0.8

1.5 ± 1.1

1.2 ± 0.9

 Theca interna cells

5.5 ± 1.7

9.3 ± 1.2*

6.2 ± 0.7

 Interstitial cells

5.2 ± 0.8

7.4 ± 1.4*

4.2 ± 1.6

Abbreviations: CG control group, GA androgenized group, GAmet androgenized + metformin group. The data for all the groups are presented as the means±standard deviations. The histological results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test. The VEGFA, Ki67 and CYP17 immunohistochemical data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Dunn test. *p < 0.01 compared with the other groups and **p < 0.05 compared with the GAmet group

As shown through Ki67, VEGFA and CYP17 immunohistochemistry analyses (Table 1 and Fig. 2), the expression of Ki67 was increased in the granulosa cells and decreased in the theca interna cells and interstitial cells of the GAmet animals compared with the GA animals (p < 0.05). Compared with the CG animals, the expression of Ki67 in the GAmet animals was similar in the three structures under consideration.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Photomicrographs of ovary sections immunostained for VEGFA (a, b, c); note the higher level of staining in the inner theca and granulosa cells in the GA group (b). Ki67 (e, f, g) staining was highest in the inner theca of the GA group (f) and lowest in the granulosa cells of the control group (e). CYP17 (i, j, k) expression was highest in the inner theca of the GA (j) group and in the granulosa cells of the control group (i). d, h, and l are negative controls for VEGFA, Ki67 and CYP17, respectively. Arrows: inner theca; asterisks: granulosa cells. Bars = 20 mm; magnification × 400

VEGFA expression was reduced in the three structures of interest in the GAmet animals compared with the GA animals (p < 0.05). CYP17 was expressed at the lowest levels in the granulosa cells from the GA rats (p < 0.05) and at the highest levels in the theca interna and interstitial cells from the GA rats (p < 0.05, Table 1 and Fig. 2).

Graphical representations of the correlation between the weight data and CYP17 expression in thecae cells and between the glucose/insulin ratio and CYP17 expression in theca cells are presented in Fig. 3. No correlation was observed between the weight data and CYP17 expression in any of the groups or analyzed structures (granulosa, theca and interstitial cells). We observed significant correlations between the expression in theca interna cells and the glucose/insulin ratio in the GA rats (r = − 0.81, p = 0.001) and the GAmet rats (r = − 0.61, p = 0.03). No correlation was observed between the granulosa or interstitial cells and CYP17 expression in the control group.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Graphical representations of the Spearman rank test for the correlation of the weight data withCYP17 expression in thecae cells of the (a) CG group (control group, no correlation), (b) GA group (androgen group, no correlation), and (C) GAmet group (metformin group, no correlation). d–f show graphical representations of the correlations between the glucose/insulin ratio data and CYP17 expression in theca cells. d CG, no correlation, (e) GA, significant correlation (r = − 0.81, p = 0.001), and (f)GAmet, significant correlation (r = − 0.61, p = 0.03)

Discussion

The effects of metformin on insulin metabolism have been previously evaluated [32]. However, the effects of this drug on the reproductive system, particularly the ovaries, is not well understood [3]. Here, we found that metformin partially restored the follicular dynamics with an increase in the number of luteal bodies and intense decreases in androgen-induced proliferation of thecae cells and CYP-17 expression, which is responsible for steroidogenesis and the maintenance of androgen production [12, 18, 33]. These effects restore the normal morphology of ovaries [3437], but the aim of our study was not to observe the effect of metformin on the atresia of follicles. Further study is necessary to test this hypothesis.

In the study conducted by Shah and Patel [20], the androgenized rats exhibited a significant increase in CYP 17A1 expression in ovarian theca cells compared with the normal group, and the insulin levels were increased significantly. Treatment with metformin produced a significant decrease in the insulin levels [19, 38]. The results from another animal model using dehydroepiandrosterone to induce conditional hyperandrogenic PCOS demonstrated that treatment with metformin restored the percentage of endothelial and periendothelial cells and the level of ovarian VEGF [33]. Metformin also normalized the insulin concentration in PCOS rats and improved follicular development [33, 39]. These results suggest that metformin regulates vascular formation and stability in developing ovarian follicles from DHEA-treated rats. Metformin reduced the higher VEGF ovarian concentration. However, the researchers did not correlate the glucose/insulin ratio with the expression of CYP-17. In our study, we found that decreased CYP-17 was correlated with a low glucose/insulin ratio, which might reflect the insulin resistance detected in our animal model.

Hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism are closely related [40, 41]. In fact, increased insulin levels are an important factor for the maintenance of hyperandrogenism. Together with luteinizing hormone (LH), insulin directly affects androgen production by increasing the androgen levels in theca interna cells in the ovaries in animal models [8, 12, 20]. Hence, the histological and immunohistochemical changes observed in our study might be associated with insulin metabolism, particularly in relation to CYP17 activity in theca interna cells. Metformin might reverse the effects of androgens on neonatal female rats through this mechanism and by modulating the insulin levels [20].

The mechanism of action of metformin involves AMPK in the insulin receptor signaling pathway [3]. Cell culture experiments have demonstrated that metformin directly inhibits rat ovarian theca-interstitial cell proliferation through AMPK [40, 42]. This action might explain the decrease in KI-67 and VEGF levels in theca cells obtained after metformin treatment in our animals. Metformin might indirectly decrease the production of liver growth factors, which might act on the ovaries [34, 41]. In our model, the number of IGF-1 receptors is decreased in granulosa cells and increased in theca interna cells, thus contributing to an increase in hyperandrogenism [35, 43]. Additionally, at high non-physiological concentrations, insulin binds to IGF-1 receptors, but if these receptors are blocked or reduced in number, insulin binds to the IGF-1 receptors on theca cells, thereby activating the receptors, which then increase androgen production [35]. Consequently, a reduction in insulin decreases CYP-17 expression and increases androgen production. Androgens, in turn, also lead to insulin resistance, particularly when administered to female rats during the prenatal period [36]. This fact might explain the higher glucose/insulin ratio values observed in the animals that were not treated with metformin in this study and that were previously reported [8].

VEGFA is an important agent involved in follicular growth and maturation, ovulation, and the development and maintenance of the corpus luteum [39]. Excess VEGFA levels might be related to ovarian hyperstimulation and the formation of multiple ovarian cysts. In our study, VEGF expression was altered following metformin administration to androgenized animals. In fact, metformin affects the regulation of angiogenesis and prevents excessive vascularization related to VEGF action, as demonstrated in the study conducted by di Pietro et al. [33]. In their study, female rats were androgenized with dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and then treated with metformin, and the results were similar to those obtained in our model. VEGF is also sensitive to the insulin levels. Thus, the decreased insulin levels might justify the lower VEGF levels observed in the ovary [20, 44, 45].

Metformin is important in both ameliorating the glucose/insulin ratio in androgenized animals and improving ovarian follicular dynamics and enzymatic activity (CYP-17). Other insulin sensitizers, such as inositol, which re-establishes hormonal and metabolic parameters to the homeostatic levels, have been recently introduced and may have similar effect to metformin [46, 47].

The data reported in this manuscript were obtained from animal models and are not applicable to daily medical practice. This is a limitation of this study. Another limitation is that we did not evaluate liver function, notably the determination of IGF-1 and its binding proteins. Thus, there is a need for additional studies to verify the effects observed in this study, and further in vitro studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms through which metformin exerts its effects.

Conclusions

The effects of metformin on follicular cells and on CYP-17 expression in testosterone-androgenized female rats included improvements in the glucose levels and changes to proliferation and ovarian steroidogenesis in androgenized rats.

Abbreviations

CG: 

Control group

CYP11a1: 

Cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily A member 1

CYP17a1: 

Cytochrome P450 family 17 subfamily A member 1

GA: 

Androgenized group

GAmet: 

Androgenized group with metformin

Ki67: 

Marker of proliferation Ki-67

PCOS: 

Polycystic ovarian syndrome

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor A

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Process Number: 2009/54019-9). Pio XI St, 1500. Alto da Lapa. São Paulo/SP-Brazil. Postal Code: 05468–901.

Funding

This project was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – Process Number: 2009/54019–9). Pio XI St, 1500. Alto da Lapa. São Paulo/SP-Brazil. Postal Code: 05468–901.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

RRM conceived of and designed the study, performed experiments, interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. ECB and CCM conceived of and designed the study, corrected the manuscript, made substantial contributions to the study conception, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. RRM and MJS performed experiments and wrote specific sections of the manuscript. GRSS and MCB performed experiments and interpreted morphological data. JMS and ECB interpreted data and corrected the manuscript. ECB and JMS designed the study and participated in the revision of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Where the work was performed: Laboratory of Structural and Molecular Gynecology (LIM-58)/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Laboratory of Gynecology Federal University of Sao Paulo.

Ethics approval

This project was approved by the Institutional Research Committee at Federal University Federal of São Paulo (0351/11), in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines Regarding Animal Experimentation and with the ethical principles recommended by the Brazilian Committee on Animal Experimentation (COBEA, Brazil).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gynecology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
(2)
Laboratory of Molecular and Structural Gynecology (LIM 58) of Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
(3)
Department of Morphology and Genetics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

References

  1. Legro RS. Type 2 diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome. FertilSteril. 2006;86:S16–S7.Google Scholar
  2. Palomba S, Falbo A, Zullo F, Orio F Jr. Evidence-based and potential benefits of metformin in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive review. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:1–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Palomba S, Daolio J, La Sala GB. Oocyte competence in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. TrendsEndocrinolMetab. 2017;28:186–98.Google Scholar
  4. Paul C, Laganà AS, Maniglio P, Triolo O, Brady DM. Inositol’s and other nutraceuticals’ synergistic actions counteract insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian syndrome and metabolic syndrome: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:431–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Muscogiuri G, Palomba S, Laganà AS, Orio F. Inositols in the treatment of insulin-mediated diseases. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:3058393.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Walters KA, Allan CM, Handelsman DJ. Rodent models for human polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. McNeilly AS, Duncan WC. Rodent models of polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;373:2–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mahamed RR, Maganhin CC, Simões RS, de Jesus Simões M, Baracat EC, Soares JM Jr. Effects of metformin on the reproductive system of androgenized female rats. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1507–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee MT, Anderson E, Lee GY. Changes in ovarian morphology and serum hormones in the rat after treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone. Anat Rec. 1991;231:185–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Allemand MC, Irving BA, Asmann YW, Klaus KA, Tatpati L, Coddington CC, et al. Effect of testosterone on insulin stimulated IRS1 Ser phosphorylation in primary rat myotubes--a potential model for PCOS-related insulin resistance. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Qiao J, Yan LY, Huang S, Zhao PL, Yan J. Selective impairment in glycogen synthase kinase-3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation: comparisons with the hyperandrogenic and the hyperinsulinemic rats. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1447–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li H, Chen Y, Yan LY, Qiao J. Increased expression of P450scc and CYP17 in development of endogenous hyperandrogenism in a rat model of PCOS. Endocrine. 2013;43:184–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ortega I, Cress AB, Wong DH, Villanueva JA, Sokalska A, Moeller BC, et al. Simvastatin reduces steroidogenesis by inhibiting Cyp17a1 gene expression in rat ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Biol Reprod. 2012;86:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cittadini A, Napoli R, Monti MG, Rea D, Longobardi S, Netti PA, et al. Metformin prevents the development of chronic heart failure in the SHHF rat model. Diabetes. 2012;61:944–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mesbah F, Moslem M, Vojdani Z, Mirkhani HH. Does metformin improve in vitro maturation and ultrastructure of oocytes retrieved from estradiol valerate polycystic ovary syndrome-induced rats. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8:74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton JB, Wolfe JM. The effect of male hormone substances upon birth and prenatal development in the rat. Anat Rec. 1938;70:433–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffith JQ, Farris EJ. The rat in laboratory investigation. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Publishers Company; 1942.Google Scholar
  18. Barraclough CA. Production of anovulatory, sterile rats by single injections of testosterone propionate. Endocrinology. 1961;68:62–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wrenn TR, Wood JR, Bitman J. Oestrogen responses of rats neonatally sterilized with steroids. J Endocrinol. 1969;45:415–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shah KN, Patel SS. Phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase inhibition: a new potential target for the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Pharm Biol. 2016;54:975–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shorr E. A new technic for staining vaginal smears: III, a single differential stain. Science. 1941;94:545–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Michalany J. Técnica histológica em anatomia patológica: com instruções para o cirurgião, enfermeira e citotécnico. 3rd ed. EditoraMichalany: São Paulo; 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Burge MR, McLeod J, Bowsher RR, Schade DS. Validity of coat-A-count insulin RIA kit for quantifying total and free humalog. ClinChem. 1996;42:777.Google Scholar
  24. Macedo LA, Carbonel AA, Simões RS, Fuchs LF, do Amaral VC, Simoncini T, et al. Effects of metformin on the adrenal cortex of androgenized rats. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31:609–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rossi AG, Soares JM Jr, Motta EL, Simões MJ, Oliveira-Filho RM, Haidar MA, et al. Metoclopramide-induced hyperprolactinemia affects mouse endometrial morphology. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54:185–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pedersen T, Peters H. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1968;17:555–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Maciel GA, Soares Júnior JM, Alves da Motta EL, Abi Haidar M, de Lima GR, Baracat EC. Nonobese women with polycystic ovary syndrome respond better than obese women to treatment with metformin. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:355–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Israely T, Nevo N, Harmelin A, Neeman M, Tsafriri A. Reducing ischaemic damage in rodent ovarian xenografts transplanted into granulation tissue. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1368–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Acuña E, Fornes R, Fernandois D, Garrido MP, Greiner M, Lara HE, et al. Increases in norepinephrine release and ovarian cyst formation during ageing in the rat. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoshida M, Sanbuissyo A, Hisada S, Takahashi M, Ohno Y, Nishikawa A. Morphological characterization of the ovary under normal cycling in rats and its viewpoints of ovarian toxicity detection. J Toxicol Sci. 2009;34:SP189–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Panzan MQ, Mattar R, Maganhin CC, SimõesRdos S, Rossi AG, Motta EL, et al. Evaluation of FAS and caspase-3 in the endometrial tissue of patients with idiopathic infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167:47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Azziz R. PCOS in 2015: New insights into the genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:74–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Di Pietro M, Parborell F, Irusta G, Pascuali N, Bas D, Bianchi MS, et al. Metformin regulates ovarian angiogenesis and follicular development in a female polycystic ovary syndrome rat model. Endocrinology. 2015;156:1453–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dunaif A. Hyperandrogenic anovulation (PCOS): a unique disorder of insulin action associated with an increased risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1995;98:33S–9S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seibel SA, Chou KH, Capp E, Spritzer PM, von Eye Corleta H. Effect of metformin on IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 levels in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138:122–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. More AS, Mishra JS, Gopalakrishnan K, Blesson CS, Hankins GD, Sathishkumar K. Prenatal testosterone exposure leads to gonadal hormone-dependent hyperinsulinemia and gonadal hormone-independent glucose intolerance in adult male rat offspring. Biol Reprod. 2016;94:5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome.NEngl. J Med. 2005;352:1223–36.Google Scholar
  38. Ismail TA, Soliman MM, Nassan MA. Molecular and immunohistochemical effects of metformin in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9:1921–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Tjwa M, Luttun A, Autiero M, Carmeliet P. VEGF and PlGF: two pleiotropic growth factors with distinct roles in development and homeostasis. Cell Tissue Res. 2003;314:5–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev. 2012;33:981–1030.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Beltrame AL, Serafini P, Motta EL, Soares Júnior JM, Baracat EC. The effects of bromocriptine on VEGF, kidney function and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in in vitro fertilization patients: a pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:201–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Soares Júnior JM, Baracat MC, Maciel GA, Baracat EC. Polycystic ovary syndrome: controversies and challenges. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61:485–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson VL, Legro RS, Strauss JF 3rd, McAllister JM. Augmented androgen production is a stable steroidogenic phenotype of propagated theca cells from polycystic ovaries. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:946–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hale LJ, Hurcombe J, Lay A, Santamaría B, Valverde AM, Saleem MA, et al. Insulin directly stimulates VEGF-A production in the glomerular podocyte. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;305:F182–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ge R, Wang Z, Wu S, Zhuo Y, Otsetov AG, Cai C, et al. Metformin represses cancer cells via alternate pathways in N-cadherin expressing vs. N-cadherin deficient cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:28973–87.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. A P, Laganà AS, Barbaro L. Comparison between effects of myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol on ovarian function and metabolic factors in women with PCOS. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30:205–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Laganà AS, Rossetti P, Buscema M, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Gullo G, et al. Metabolism and ovarian function in PCOS women: a therapeutic approach with inositols. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:6306410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement