Skip to main content
Download PDF

Role of different non-coding RNAs as ovarian cancer biomarkers

Journal of Ovarian Research volume 15, Article number: 72 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Among many gynecological malignancies ovarian cancer is the most prominent and leading cause of female mortality worldwide. Despite extensive research, the underlying cause of disease progression and pathology is still unknown. In the progression of ovarian cancer different non-coding RNAs have been recognized as important regulators. The biology of ovarian cancer which includes cancer initiation, progression, and dissemination is found to be regulated by different ncRNA. Clinically ncRNA shows high prognostic and diagnostic importance.

Results

In this review, we prioritize the role of different non-coding RNA and their perspective in diagnosis as potential biomarkers in the case of ovarian cancer. Summary of some of the few miRNAs involved in epithelial ovarian cancer their expression and clinical features are being provided in the table. Also, in cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and migration abnormal expression of piRNAs are emerging as a crucial regulator hence the role of few piRNAs is being given. Both tRFs and tiRNAs play important roles in tumorigenesis and are promising diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for cancer. lncRNA has shown a leading role in malignant transformation and potential therapeutic value in ovarian cancer therapy.

Conclusions

Hence in this review we demonstrated the role of different ncRNA that play an important role in serving strong potential as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Introduction

Gynecological cancers, which include malignancies of the cervix, ovary, uterus, vulva, vaginal, and fallopian tubes, are among the top causes of female mortality around the world, with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancers being the most common. Ovarian malignancies, in particular, continue to be a major source of morbidity and mortality. Over the past four decades, only a few improvements have been made in the survival rates. The early stage of ovarian cancer is still curable in 90% of women, but a large number of women get symptoms when the disease progresses to the last stage. Based on histopathological features ovarian tumors are categorized into three subtypes i.e., epithelial, sex cords, and germline tumors. Among all OCs epithelial ovarian cancer accounts for 80-85% of ovarian cancer [1]. EOC is further classified into five major classes based on morphological and histological differences: High-grade serous carcinoma, Mucinous carcinoma, Low-grade serous carcinoma, Endometrial carcinoma, and Clear cell carcinoma. HGSOC was formerly believed to originate from the ovarian surface epithelium, however, new research suggests that the majority of advanced HGSOC comes from the fallopian tube fimbriae [2]. The most common and deadliest histotype of ovarian cancer is high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which accounts for about 75% of all EOC-related deaths [1]. TP53 is mutated in about 90% of individuals with the most frequent subtype, HGSOC. The development of a breakthrough therapy targeting poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) via inhibitors was prompted by advances in next-generation sequencing, which revealed that mutations in DNA repair pathways, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, are common in roughly 50% of HGSOC patients [3].

Pelvic examination, Transvaginal ultrasound, and measurement levels of CA125, HE4, p53, and Wnt/ β catenin are the few methods available for monitoring and detection of ovarian cancer. All these methods with few improved outcomes still lack adequate specificity and sensitivity. Hence for better management (prediction, progression, and response to treatment) of ovarian cancer, there is a need for new biomarkers. Bioinformatics paved the way for genome sequencing and gene expression profiling that are being used in clinical trials in the screening of potent biomarkers [4,5,6]. These methods are helpful to predict tumor molecular information, and chemotherapy prediction, and influence the survival rate of patients.

Today ongoing researchers have provided tools and techniques for improved diagnosis and management for advanced detection and effective targeted therapy with reduced toxicity. Hence for the regulation of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, research is being made to find suitable targets. Initially, 98% of genome sequences were allocated as junk DNA, which is further transcribed as non-coding RNA (ncRNA). These non-coding RNAs are important therapeutic targets because they modulate gene expression and disease progression [7]. Clinically ncRNA shows high prognostic and diagnostic importance. In this mini-review, we prioritize the role of different non-coding RNA and their perspective in diagnosis as potential biomarkers.

Non-coding RNA as cancer Biomarkers

The well-known fact from the central dogma of molecular biology states that DNA is transcribed into RNA and RNA is translated into protein to mediate biological function. But to our surprise, the human genome project reveals that only 1.5% of the human genome encodes for protein-coding genes [7,8,9]. And the majority of RNAs in the human genome do not code for any protein and are therefore called non-coding RNA (ncRNA). Being heterogeneous in size it plays a significant role in the development of human disease. Small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been identified as essential regulators in ovarian cancer metastasis and progression. Their dysregulation affects gene expression and cellular signaling networks, and it’s seen in liquid biopsies.

A biomarker is a marker that can be used to predict clinical prognosis, risk of recurrence, or the diagnostic potential of a specific target. The development of new sequencing strategies; characterization of tumor pathways; high throughput screening of druggable targets and their predictive outcome leads to the success of biomarker-based therapy outcome [5, 6, 10]. One of the first biomarkers to reach clinical practice was the development and detection of mutations in the KRAS gene in cases of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) [11]. Hence a biomarker is a collection of genetic and proteomic signatures used to differentiate between diseased and healthy individuals. These signatures can be in the form of RNA (mRNA, miRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA), DNA (ssDNA, dsDNA, and retrotransposons), or protein (antibodies and peptides) depending upon the site of secretion and isolation. Based on their sizes ncRNA can be divided into two types, sncRNA (small non-coding RNAs) and lncRNA (long non-coding RNAs). Small non-coding RNAs are further divided into microRNAs (miRNAs), transfer RNA (tRNA), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), and piwiRNAs (piRNAs). Different types of ncRNAs are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different types of ncRNAs

Full size image

The abnormal sncRNA expression has been linked to a variety of cellular dysfunctions and disease states. Multiple sncRNA groups appear to play essential roles in cancer start, development, and pathophysiology, according to growing evidence. sncRNA mutations have a strong diagnostic and prognostic value clinically. It is hoped that with a better understanding of the nature and functions of non-coding RNAs, we may be able to develop cancer therapies that act by modulating these RNA molecules. The development of medicines that may disrupt the oncogenic effects of non-coding RNAs has been inspired by advances in in-vivo nucleic acid delivery technologies and in-silico methodologies.

These ncRNAs are often deregulated in cancer and play a crucial role in different biological processes. Gene expression is regulated by miRNAs at the posttranscriptional level, whereas transcriptional and posttranscriptional events are regulated by lncRNA, and some play significant roles in the pathogenesis of human diseases. Many ncRNAs (lncRNA, siRNA, miRNA, piRNA, and circRNA) play significant roles in various stages of cancer; their roles are well demonstrated in ovarian cancer and its treatment [12, 13]. Necrotic and apoptotic cells help [14] them to get released into blood circulation where they are associated with proteins called argonaute [12, 13, 15, 16]. Argonautes are helpful to ncRNAs, particularly these proteins bind to short non-coding RNAs and play a significant role in RNA-based silencing by regulating protein synthesis and RNA stability. It also helps to maintain chromosome integrity, further, it is involved in siRNA and miRNA maturation, and can even contribute to the generation of Piwi-interacting (pi)RNAs, a new class of short non-coding RNAs [17].

ncRNAs are considered suitable biomarkers for detecting many human diseases including cancer. They can easily differentiate between normal healthy individuals from patients, they are stable in circulation, they can be easily collected through non-invasive methods, and reflect disease progression. All these properties fit very well in ncRNA, especially circulating miRNAs. Quantitative RT-PCR or high-throughput techniques like nanostring or miRNA microarrays can readily determine the level of circulating miRNAs. Chao et al. investigated potential miRNAs in the serum of patients with clear cell OC employing quantitative PCR (qPCR) for 270 miRNAs. Before the serum marker CA125 was revealed to be high, they discovered elevated serum levels of miR-130a in early illness recurrence [18]. More interestingly, the accuracy of profilinnong specific miRNAs rather than traditional platelet counts, prothrombin international normalized ratios (INRs), or albumin in predicting illness appears to be quite significant [19]. As a result, specific miRNA expression profiles in sera, when combined with biochemical data, may be more effective non-invasive predictive and therapeutic markers for ovarian cancer. Hence to assess the miRNA measurement for biomarkers serum, plasma and ascites are used. Also, lncRNAs are a diverse group of ncRNAs that can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cancer. Circulating lncRNAs have proven to be incredibly useful in the identification of several cancer types in recent years. They are useful as biomarkers not only because circulating lncRNAs may be acquired readily and non-invasively from cancer patients, but also because these lncRNAs are relatively persistent in body fluids. Besides these, a list of Circulating ncRNAs involved in advanced ovarian cancer had already been described by Schwarzenbach and Gahan. In this paper,r we will mention the role of only those ncRNAs that are involved in ovarian cancer.

Different types of sncRNA involved in ovarian cancer

miRNA

miRNAs is a small (18-25 nucleotides in length) single-stranded non-coding RNA that helps in gene expression (RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation). The majority of genes coded by proteins are controlled by miRNA. With help of northern blotting and q-PCR researchers can identify miRNA in body fluids and differentiate between miRNA isomers respectively. But since these methods lack sensitivity, it is, therefore, sequencing of small RNAs to identify novel RNA. Fifteen years ago, since the first evidence of miRNA came it was established that miRNA plays an important role in the evolution and progression of cancer. Hence dysregulation in signatures of miRNAs is involved in every stage of ovarian cancer. So now we affirm that signatures of miRNA can differentiate between tissues of normal and cancer subtypes, in various cancers because miRNAs are tissue-specific, they are disrupted in a variety of disorders. However, because they are secreted in body fluids, some miRNAs are promising candidates for biomarker research. In comparison to mRNA expression signatures, miRNA signatures are shown to have more predictive power [20, 21]. In ovarian physiology Deregulation of miRNA in OC is an important feature for its regulation. In epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) miR-29b, miR-125b, miR-29a, and let-7 are downregulated and are exceptionally expressed in normal ovarian tissues. In normal ovarian functioning, this deregulation of miRNA is now linked to EOC pathogenesis by the researchers. For instance, 39 miRNAs in tumor tissues are remarkably deregulated in contrast to the normal ovary, out of which the overexpressed miRNAs are miR-141, miR-200a, miR200c, and miR200b on the other hand down-regulated miRNAs were miR-199a, miR-140, miR-145 and miR-125b1 [22]. The emphasis on miRNA networks in EOC survival is shown in various studies which conclude that eight miRNAs (miR-101, miR-141, miR-506, miR-25, miR-29c, miR-182, miR-128, and miR-200a) that were downregulated were predicted to regulate the majority of miRNA-associated genes [20, 21, 23]. Table 1 describes the Summary of some of the few miRNAs involved in epithelial ovarian cancer their expression and clinical features.

Table 1 Features different types of miRNA, their expression pattern, signaling pathways, functions, and target regulators
Full size table

piRNA

These are single-stranded non-coding RNAs of 26-31 nucleotides in length. In the silencing of retrotransposons, piRNAs play an important role in epigenetic and post-transcriptional levels. Based on origin piRNAs can be divided into (a) transposon-derived piRNA, (b) lncRNA-derived piRNAs, and (c) mRNA-derived piRNAs. All these piRNAs are gathered on chromosomes two, four, five, and seven on short genomic loci. RNA polymerase II transcribed piRNAs which are then transported to the cytoplasm and prepared into smaller sequences (mature piRNAs). Although the function and biogenesis of piRNAs are not clear, studies with deep sequencing technology help to compare different expression profiles of these sncRNAs in different tissues. Particularly, researchers now search for differential expression of different sncRNAs in tumor tissues to compare with normal tissues in different metastatic cancers [3, 12, 13, 44].

Researchers showed that PIWI proteins are also associated with cancer hallmarks. piRNAs also show a distinguished role in OC. Four PIWI proteins i.e., PIWIL1/HIWI, PIWIL2/HILI PIWIL3/HIWI3 and PIWIL4/HIWI2 that have been identified in the prognosis and diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer [12, 13, 45]. Weng, Li et al. reviewed piRNAs’ involvement in prognosis, diagnosis, migration, and invasion in different cancers [46].

piRNAs are the advancing important regulator in the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and migration of cancer cells [3]. The study and expression of piRNA in various gynecological malignancies remains exploratory. To detect piRNAs in various samples including normal ovary (pi RNA #219), serous ovarian cancer (pi RNA #234), and endometrioid (pi RNA #256), Singh et al. used the method of RNA sequencing [47]. The study involved small sample numbers but still, authors reported around 143(56 upregulated and 81 downregulated differentially expressed piRNAs) and 159 (74 upregulated and 77 down-regulated, differentially expressed piRNAs) differentially expressed piRNAs in serous ovarian cancer and endometrioid respectively. Extensive research concludes piR-52,207 was found to be upregulated in endometrioid ovarian cancer, and piR-52,207 and piR-33,733 were increased in serous ovarian cancer [47]. piR-52,207 and piR-33,733 promote endometrioid ovarian cancer and serous ovarian cancer cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenesis respectively. This is being done by targeting MTR, NUDT4, EIF2S3, and MPHOSPH8 by piR-52,207 and LIAS30-UTRs by piR-33,733 respectively. At the post-transcriptional level, piR-52,207 and piR-33,733 enhance ovarian cancer oncogenes through their involvement in several cell-signaling pathways, suggesting that they could be used as drug targets in ovarian cancer [3, 47].

tRNA (tRNA-derived small RNAs)

Transfer RNA is the most prevalent cellular ncRNA that is crucial for protein translation (tRNA). Depending on the cleavage site, tsRNAs can be divided into two groups the first one is tRFs (transfer RNA-derived RNA fragments) which are derived from mature tRNAs and is 14 to 30 nucleotides in length. The second type is tRNA halves, or tiRNAs, which have a length of 29 to 50 nucleotides and are generated by stress. It is produced by specific cleavage at the anticodon loop of mature tRNA. tRFs are further categorised into tRF-1 s, tRF-3 s, tRF-5 s, and internal tRFs (i-tRFs or tRF-2 s), while tiRNAs are subdivided into 50tiRNA and 30tiRNA. Both tRFs and tiRNAs play essential roles in carcinogenesis and have the potential to be used as predictive novel therapies targets in cancer [3]. tRFs interact with aminoacyl tRNA synthetases and ribosomes together with this they can modulate protein translation. Additionally, tRFs may influence gene expression by forming cell-type-specific associations with Ago and PIWI proteins. Furthermore, the association between RNA-binding proteins and tRFs is important in cancer development and metastasis. tsRNAs drive cell cycle progression and proliferation in many malignancies by influencing proto-oncogene and oncogene expression levels [48].

One of the tRFs has been found to play a significant role in ovarian cancer i.e., tRF5Glu [3, 49]. The expression levels of two different tRFs i.e. ts-101 and ts-46 (tRF-1 s) correlate with cell survival, apoptosis, cell proliferation, chromatin structure, and clonal growth, in ovarian cancer, colon cancer, and breast, cancer patients, as well as corresponding cell lines. In oncogene activation and progression of ovarian cancer the expression of tRFs plays a significant role [50]. In around 180 serum samples which includes 97 patients with ovarian cancer, 22 borderline tumors, 15 healthy controls, and 46 benign tumors; it was revealed after reanalysis of RNA-sequencing data, that out of total small RNA, tsRNAs make up a large part of serum samples, ranging from 2.5–29.4%, and they are enriched in a plethora of different tRNA (e.g., Gly-tRNA), as well as being able to accurately detect aberrant cell proliferation [51]. In a study using blood samples from ovarian cancer patients and healthy donors, as well as ovarian cancer cell lines, it was discovered that tRF-03357 inhibits HMBOX1 and promotes SK-OV-3 cell migration, proliferation, and invasion [48].

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) involved in ovarian cancer

lncRNA is the RNA transcript with a length exceeding 200 nucleotides which are not translated into proteins. Neither do they have any open reading frames nor do they code for any proteins (But still there is a debate between some authors who showed they do encode for protein). In terms of protein-coding genes, and based on location lncRNAs are classified as (1) intergenic lncRNAs that are present between two protein-coding genes (2) intronic lncRNAs introns of protein-coding genes transcribe them), (3) overlapping lncRNAs a coding gene is located on the intron (4) antisense lncRNAs-the opposite strand of protein-coding gene transcribes them (5) processed lncRNAs - lacks an open reading frame ORF. Ren et al. found about 210,000 lncRNAs, of which 106,063 are humanly related (lncRNAWiki, 2015), while only 16,840 were found in Gencode (https://www.gencodegenes.org) [52]. RNA polymerase II transcribes lncRNAs, which are regulated by the SWI/SNF complex’s transcriptional activators. Gene transcription, imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, nuclear architectural organization, and epigenetic chromatin modification are a few of the complex functions that lncRNAs perform [20, 21, 53]. Multiple processes involving lncRNAs can play a role in cancer development and progression. The role of lncRNAs in cancer progression has been intensively researched, primarily via epigenetic regulation, triggering of carcinogenic pathways, and interaction with other RNA subtypes. Some lncRNAs, may be isolated non-invasively from the blood and are highly tissue-specific and abnormally expressed in cancer. Using lncRNA as markers has an advantage over protein-coding RNAs because their expression is a better indication of the tumor state. Because of new technology, several lncRNAs are now linked to cancer and are emerging as novel regulatory players in molecular biology. lncRNA often has tissue-specific patterns that differentiate them from miRNAs and protein-coding mRNAs, which are expressed in a variety of tissues [7]. They are precise biomarkers for cancer diagnoses because of their specificity [7, 54]. These characteristics make them prospective candidates for cancer detection. PCA3, a biomarker for early prostate cancer diagnosis, is the most well-known (PCa).

Certain forms of highly expressed cancer-associated lncRNAs can be used to find new potential biomarkers [55]. Pathways mediating transcriptional gene silencing, particularly those of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, can provide therapeutic benefits [56]. Biomarkers should be detected in non-invasive samples for the comfort of patients. Body fluids, such as serum or urine, are desirable samples because they contain circulating nucleic acids (CNAs), both DNA and RNA species. Plasma, cell-free serum, sputum, and urine all contain CNAs [57, 58]. Due to high stability while circulating in body fluids that makes lncRNAs are suitable for cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers especially when included in exosomes or apoptotic bodies [59, 60]. Table 2 emphasized those lncRNAs that have shown a leading role in malignant transformation and potential therapeutic value in ovarian cancer therapy.

Table 2 Depicts the clinical significance of different lncRNAs in ovarian cancer
Full size table

Future perspective

PIWI-like (PIWIL) genes, which belong to the Ago family, are frequently altered in ovarian cancer, and these proteins, along with piRNA, are implicated in several stages of malignancy and are linked to advanced tumor stage and poor prognosis. The PIWI proteins, together with piRNA, are primarily expressed in cancer cells, making them excellent indicators for cancer diagnosis as well as potential therapeutic targets.

tsRNAs are reported to be dysregulated in a variety of cancers, including gynecologic malignancies, and because Ago proteins (like miR) and PIWI proteins (like piRNAs) are accompanied by these tsRNAs, they can influence gene expression both pre-and post-transcriptionally (like piRNA) (like miR). Since tsRNAs may be easily found in cancer patients’ urine and serum, they are considered powerful diagnostic indicators. As a result, because tsRNAs are involved in tumor initiation, progression, and medication response, they could be used as therapeutic targets or diagnostic markers. Our comprehension of the roles of piRNA- and tRNA-derived small RNAs is still limited; however, much valuable information is available for miR, and a few studies are in the early stages of development for cancer therapy, with some clinical studies in headway for ovarian cancer e.g. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03738319, NCT03776630, NCT01970696, NCT02253251, NCT03877796). Since each trial has been assigned with a number hence the details of each trial (e.g., Study type, Number of participants involved in the study, the start date of the study, primary completion date, study completion date, etc) can be found at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier. Based on this growing body of research, it’s feasible that miRs in plasma will be utilized to diagnose the prognostic malignancies shortly. On the other hand, the abnormal expression and involvement in a variety of biological functions, lncRNAs could be used to treat cancer. In an assorted lineage of cancer, lncRNAs are either aberrantly expressed or mutated [70]. Several lncRNAs have been demonstrated to have an inhibitory or stimulating effect on tumor formation, metastasis, cell survival, immunological response, and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer [71,72,73]. Since lncRNAs play a pivotal role in ovarian cancer, they can be used as prognostic and diagnostic markers as well as therapeutic targets. For instance; 53 lncRNAs associated with ovarian cancer have been revealed by extensive RNA sequencing. Only 25 are directly related to a clinical purpose, whereas 27 were upregulated and 26 were downregulated [74]. Even from these few lncRNAs, it is evident that additional research is needed to link them to a specific stage in the development and management of OC to determine their specific roles in tumor formation, cell migration, and metastasis. The importance of deciphering the processes of lncRNA has already been established in clinical investigations. Even though certain lncRNAs have been thoroughly studied in clinical trials or patented, their applications still have a long way to go.

Conclusion

Due to the heterogeneity of the illness, a patient with ovarian cancer has several significant problems, including late detection, poor prognosis, a lack of accurate indicators, and resistance to available treatments. Considering a substantial contribution to the study of sncRNA, it is now well accepted that these small non-coding RNAs play a pivotal role in gene regulation and play a crucial part in the development of Ovarian cancer. A single small non-coding RNA can distinguish between diseases; however, a combination of sncRNA indicators could be illustrative of the molecular progression of ovarian cancer for early diagnosis and increased disease monitoring. Novel and well-studied sncRNAs are required for a better understanding of disease progression. As a result, new approaches are required to measure these alterations and enable the development of future biomarkers.

Over the last 20 years, it has been made clear how miRNA regulates different hallmarks of cancer and now it’s our priority to take advantage of this knowledge to improve cancer patient diagnosis and prognosis. However, there are still several obstacles that stand in the way of using miRNA as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, including genetic background, sample procedures, detecting techniques, ethnicity, and genetic background. To overcome the foregoing factors on the observed miRNA signatures, more investigations in larger patients are needed. The study of miRNA regulation in ovarian cancer is still in its early stages, accounting for only 4% of published studies. The majority of that 4% of published publications deal with target gene discovery, expression profiling, determining affected cellular pathways, resistance to traditional chemotherapeutics, and their use as therapeutic tools. As a result, we demonstrated the function of distinct sncRNAs in this review, which have a lot of potential as a therapeutic method for ovarian cancer treatment.

Availability of data and materials

In the current study as such there is no datasets used.

Abbreviations

OC:

Ovarian Cancer

sncRNA:

Small Non-Coding RNA

lncRNA:

Long Non-Coding RNA

tRNA:

Transfer RNA

miRNAs:

Micro RNA

piRNA:

Piwi-interacting RNA

tiRNA:

tRNA-Derived Stress-Induced RNAs

miR:

MicroRNAs

tRFs:

Transfer RNA-derived RNA fragments

CA125:

Carbohydrate antigen125

HE4:

Human epididymis protein 4

References

  1. Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Genestie C. Pathobiology of ovarian carcinomas. Chin J Cancer. 2015a;34(1):50–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Labidi-Galy SI, Papp E, et al. High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwivedi S, Rao G, et al. Small non-coding-RNA in gynecological malignancies. Cancers. 2021;13:1085 s note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published….

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Beg A, Parveen R. Role of bioinformatics in cancer research and drug development. Transl Bioinform Healthc Med. 2021;13:141-148.

  5. Beg A, Parveen R. Gene expression signature: an influential access to drug discovery in ovarian Cancer. Comput Intell Oncol. 2022a;1016:271–84 Springer.

  6. Beg A, Parveen R. Review of bioinformatics tools and techniques to accelerate ovarian Cancer research. Int J Bioinform Intelligent Comput. 2022b;1(1):01–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hauptman N, Glavač D. Long non-coding RNA in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013a;14(3):4655–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lander, E. S., L. M. Linton, et al. (2001). "Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.".

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stein LD. End of the beginning. Nature. 2004;431(7011):915–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beg A, Khan FI, et al. High throughput screening, docking, and molecular dynamics studies to identify potential inhibitors of human calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019;37(8):2179–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti–epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(12):2091–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwarzenbach H, Gahan PB. Circulating non-coding RNAs in recurrent and metastatic ovarian cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019a;2(3):399–418.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarzenbach H, Gahan PB. MicroRNA shuttle from cell-to-cell by exosomes and its impact in cancer. Noncoding RNA. 2019b;5(1):28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, et al. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(6):426–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roth C, Rack B, et al. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simpson RJ, Lim JW, et al. Exosomes: proteomic insights and diagnostic potential. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2009;6(3):267–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutvagner G, Simard MJ. Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(1):22–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chao A, Lai C-H, et al. Serum microRNAs in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(4):536–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roderburg C, Mollnow T, et al. Micro-RNA profiling in human serum reveals compartment-specific roles of miR-571 and miR-652 in liver cirrhosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hora S, Pandey AK, et al. Biomarker-based targeted therapeutics. Neoplasm. 2018a;159:1-44.

  21. Hora S, Pandey AK, et al. Biomarker-based targeted therapeutics: Neoplasm, IntechOpen; 2018b.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Iorio MV, Visone R, et al. MicroRNA signatures in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(18):8699–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Network CGAR. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474(7353):609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang W, Dong J, et al. miR-148a-3p suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer progression primarily by targeting c-met. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):6131–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Halvorsen AR, Kristensen G, et al. Evaluation of prognostic and predictive significance of circulating microRNAs in ovarian cancer patients. Dis Markers. 2017;2017:1-10.

  26. Hang W, Feng Y, et al. Downregulation of miR-145-5p in cancer cells and their derived exosomes may contribute to the development of ovarian cancer by targeting CT. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(1):256–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung Y-W, Bae H-S, et al. Detection of microRNA as novel biomarkers of epithelial ovarian cancer from the serum of ovarian cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(4):673-679.

  28. Hao Y, Zhu L, et al. C-Fos mediates α1, 2-fucosyltransferase 1 and Lewis y expression in response to TGF-β1 in ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2017;38(6):3355–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ha M, Kim VN. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(8):509–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobs IJ, Menon U. Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(4):355–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee M, Kim EJ, et al. MicroRNAs 125a and 125b inhibit ovarian cancer cells through post-transcriptional inactivation of EIF4EBP1. Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):8726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Eitan R, Kushnir M, et al. Tumor microRNA expression patterns associated with resistance to platinum based chemotherapy and survival in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen YN, Ren CC, et al. MicroRNA let-7d-5p rescue ovarian cancer cell apoptosis and restore chemosensitivity by regulating the p53 signaling pathway via HMGA1. Int J Oncol. 2019;54(5):1771–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leng R, Zha L, et al. MiR-718 represses VEGF and inhibits ovarian cancer cell progression. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(12):2078–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chu P, Liang A, et al. miR-205 regulates the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer cells via suppressing PTEN/SMAD4 expression. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7571–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Li H, Xu H, et al. microRNA-106a modulates cisplatin sensitivity by targeting PDCD4 in human ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(1):183–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li P, Sun Y, et al. MicroRNA-340 induces apoptosis and inhibits metastasis of ovarian cancer cells by inactivation of NF-κB1. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;38(5):1915–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li C, Duan P, et al. miR-320 inhibited ovarian cancer oncogenicity via targeting TWIST1 expression. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(8):3705.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu X, Ma L, et al. MiR-1271 inhibits ovarian cancer growth by targeting cyclin G1. Med Sci Monit. 2015a;21:3152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu T, Qin W, et al. MicroRNA-17 promotes normal ovarian cancer cells to cancer stem cell development via suppression of the LKB1-p53-p21/WAF1 pathway. Tumor Biol. 2015b;36(3):1881–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Qin W, Xie W, et al. MicroRNA-152 inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation and migration and may infer improved outcomes in ovarian cancer through targeting FOXP1. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(2):1672–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Qin W, Ren Q, et al. MicroRNA-155 is a novel suppressor of ovarian cancer-initiating cells that targets CLDN1. FEBS Lett. 2013;587(9):1434–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang A, Wang X, et al. microRNA-494 is a potential prognostic marker and inhibits cellular proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting SIRT1 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(3):3177–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Romano G, Veneziano D, et al. Small non-coding RNA and cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38(5):485–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chen C, Liu J, et al. Overexpression of PIWI proteins in human stage III epithelial ovarian cancer with lymph node metastasis. Cancer Biomarkers. 2013;13(5):315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weng W, Li H, et al. "Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) and cancer: emerging biological concepts and potential clinical implications." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-reviews on. Cancer. 2019;1871(1):160–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Singh G, Roy J, et al. Genome-wide profiling of the PIWI-interacting RNA-mRNA regulatory networks in epithelial ovarian cancers. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang M, Li F, et al. tRNA-derived fragment tRF-03357 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2019a;12:6371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou K, Diebel KW, et al. A tRNA fragment, tRF5-Glu, regulates BCAR3 expression and proliferation in ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(56):95377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Balatti V, Nigita G, et al. tsRNA signatures in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(30):8071–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Peng EY, Shu Y, et al. Presence and diagnostic value of circulating lncRNA for ovarian tumors. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ren H, Wang G, et al. Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs at early stage of skin pigmentation in goats (Capra hircus). BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Oncul S, Amero P, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer: expression profile and functional spectrum. RNA Biol. 2020;17(11):1523–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Prensner JR, Iyer MK, et al. Transcriptome sequencing across a prostate cancer cohort identifies PCAT-1, an unannotated lincRNA implicated in disease progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(8):742–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Gibb EA, Brown CJ, et al. The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol Cancer. 2011;10(1):1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Morris KV. RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing and activation in human cells. Oligonucleotides. 2009;19(4):299–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, et al. Circulating microRNA in body fluid: a new potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(10):2087–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schöler N, Langer C, et al. Serum microRNAs as a novel class of biomarkers: a comprehensive review of the literature. Exp Hematol. 2010;38(12):1126–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Akers JC, Gonda D, et al. Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EV): exosomes, microvesicles, retrovirus-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. J Neuro-Oncol. 2013;113(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bolha L, Ravnik-Glavač M, et al. Long noncoding RNAs as biomarkers in cancer. Dis Markers. 2017;2017:1-15.

  61. Zhu Z, Song L, et al. Ectopic expressed long non-coding RNA H19 contributes to malignant cell behavior of ovarian cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(9):10082.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Yu Y, Zhang X, et al. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR increases cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer by inhibiting cisplatin-induced autophagy. J Buon. 2018;23(5):1396–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang K-C, Rao PH, et al. Relationship of XIST expression and responses of ovarian Cancer to chemotherapy 1 this work was partly supported by NIH grants CA70216 and GM 59920 (to SW. N.). 1. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002;1(10):769–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hong HH, Hou LK, et al. Long non-coding RNA UCA1 is a predictive biomarker of cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):44442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Guo C, Wang X, et al. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 regulates ovarian cancer cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(12):3703–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chen Y, Du H, et al. LncRNA PVT1 promotes ovarian cancer progression by silencing miR-214. Cancer Biol Med. 2018;15(3):238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Gao J, Liu M, et al. Long non-coding RNA growth arrest-specific transcript 5 is involved in ovarian cancer cell apoptosis through the mitochondria-mediated apoptosis pathway. Oncol Rep. 2015;34(6):3212–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dong S, Wang R, et al. HOXD-AS1 promotes the epithelial to mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells by regulating miR-186-5p and PIK3R3. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Xie M, Nie FQ, et al. Decreased long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 contributing to gastric cancer cell metastasis partly via affecting epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J Transl Med. 2015;13(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Gao Y, Li X, et al. Comprehensive characterization of somatic mutations impacting lncRNA expression for pan-cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:66–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Guo Q, Cheng Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of lncRNA-mRNA co-expression patterns identifies immune-associated lncRNA biomarkers in ovarian cancer malignant progression. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Li Z, Niu H, et al. lncRNA UCA1 mediates resistance to cisplatin by regulating the miR-143/FOSL2-signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;17:92–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Yan H, Li H, et al. LncRNA FLVCR1-AS1 mediates miR-513/YAP1 signaling to promote cell progression, migration, invasion and EMT process in ovarian cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhan L, Li J, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the high computer infrastructure provided by Jamia Millia Islamia New Delhi’s Computer Science Department. Anam Beg is grateful for the ICMR’s grant of a Senior Research Fellowship. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) funded this research; PROJECT ID: 2019-4178. Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/117), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, funded this research.

Funding

The ICMR has awarded ANAM BEG a Senior Research Fellowship. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) funded this research; PROJECT ID: 2019-4178. This work is also funded by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/117), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Anam Beg & Rafat Parveen

  2. Applied Medical Science Department, CC, King Saud University, P.O Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia

    Hassan Fouad

  3. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    M. E. Yahia

  4. Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

    Azza S. Hassanein

Authors
  1. Anam Beg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafat Parveen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hassan Fouad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. E. Yahia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Azza S. Hassanein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Anam Beg: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Rafat Parveen: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Review, and Editing; Hassan Fouad: Review and Editing; M E Yahia: Review and Editing; Azza S. Hassanein: Review, Analysis, and Editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafat Parveen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All of the writers have given their permission and consent to take part in the study.

Consent for publication

All the authors have given their consent for publication.

Competing interests

There is no conflict of interest between the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beg, A., Parveen, R., Fouad, H. et al. Role of different non-coding RNAs as ovarian cancer biomarkers. J Ovarian Res 15, 72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01002-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01002-3

Keywords

Journal of Ovarian Research

ISSN: 1757-2215

Contact us